Security surveillance architecture

CCTV Handbook 2019 Editor's Choice, Surveillance

Although IP video surveillance solutions are still often referred to as CCTV (Closed Circuit Television), analogue CCTV systems with a central matrix and video recorders with very large single points of failure are thankfully a thing of the past. The industry now expects all the benefits of what should be called an IP video surveillance solution.

These include much higher-definition cameras and advanced analytics; integration to access control, building management, fire, LPR and POS systems; remote monitoring and management to name just a few. IP video surveillance solutions typically have two distinctive surveillance architectures: centralised and distributed.


A centralised architecture operates with a central server and typically with centralised recording. All processing (including logins, viewing live and recorded footage, alarm notification, etc.) must be returned to the central server from any external site.

The advantages of a centralised architecture potentially include security, administrative overhead, less backup complexity and risk from outside interference. Centralised architectures potentially suffer from scalability problems, network outages and a single point of failure.

Certain measures can be taken to ensure there is no loss of video with centralised architecture (Centralised with Redundancy) but these measures can be expensive to implement and difficult to scale. These include installing a backup server, adding dual network cards and implementing secondary NVRs (NVR failover).


Distributed architecture isn’t solely reliant on a central server, allowing data to be kept close to where it is produced or needed. When cameras, surveillance workstations, NVRs, alarm servers, integration gateways all participate in a distributed architecture, data bottlenecks are minimised as all processing doesn’t need to pass through a centralised server. As there is no central server there is potentially no single point of failure. Advantages of a distributed architecture are reduced network traffic, scalability, increased reliability and resilience.

Different types of scaling

Vertical scaling occurs in a centralised architecture when resources are added to a central server in a system; this typically involves adding CPUs or RAM/storage.

Advantages of vertical scaling are easier implementation and administration; there’s a single server to manage, and that’s it. Setup is also straightforward and running costs (in terms of space, cooling and power) are lower.

Vertical scaling is often limited to the capacity of the central server. Scaling beyond that capacity often involves downtime and has an upper limit. Further disadvantages can be high hardware costs, as you have to purchase ‘high-end’ servers. There is limited scope for upgrades as a server can only be so big. What happens when your database can no longer fit on the largest available server?

Often there’s the issue of vendor lock-in or being locked-down to a proprietary solution. You can be tied to a single database vendor and if you decide to switch this could be a very difficult migration. Or worse, result in having to start again from scratch.

Horizontal scaling occurs in a distributed architecture and means adding more machines to a system; typically distributed or at the edge to deal with the increased workload.

An important advantage of horizontal scaling is that it can provide administrators with the ability to increase capacity on the fly. Another advantage is that, in theory, horizontal scaling is only limited by how many machines can be connected successfully.

Adding inexpensive machines to a distributed architecture might seem to be a cost-effective solution at first glance, but it’s important for the administrator to identify the setup and running costs. A disadvantage could be the licensing costs for additional servers.

Understanding the different surveillance architectures and implementing the correct architecture for your site will help address your immediate security challenges and facilitate your long-term operational goals.


Credit(s)




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

What is your ‘real’ security posture?
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Many businesses operate under the illusion that their security controls, policies, and incident response plans will hold firm when tested by cybercriminals, but does this mean you are really safe?

Read more...
What is your ‘real’ security posture? (Part 2)
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure
In the second part of this series of articles from BlueVision, we explore the human element: social engineering and insider threats and how red teaming can expose and remedy them.

Read more...
From the editor's desk: The beginning of the end
Technews Publishing News & Events
            As we come to the final issue of SMART Security Solutions, we can look back on a tough year: long decision-making cycles, squeezed budgets and the expectation of miracles on a shoestring. SMART Security ...

Read more...
ONVIF to end support for Profile S
News & Events Surveillance
ONVIF has announced that it will end support for ONVIF Profile S and recommends using its successor, Profile T. Profile S is the first-ever profile introduced by ONVIF in 2011.

Read more...
IQ and AI
Leaderware Editor's Choice Surveillance AI & Data Analytics
Following his presentation at the Estate Security Conference in October, Craig Donald delves into the challenge of balancing human operator ‘IQ’ and AI system detection within CCTV control rooms.

Read more...
AI and automation are rewriting the cloud security playbook
Technews Publishing AI & Data Analytics
Old-school security relied on rules-based systems that flagged only what was already known. AI flips the script: it analyses massive volumes of data in real-time, spotting anomalies that humans or static rules would miss.

Read more...
Onsite AI avoids cloud challenges
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Most AI programs today depend on constant cloud connections, which can be a liability for companies operating in secure or high-risk environments. That reliance exposes sensitive data to external networks, but also creates a single point of failure if connectivity drops.

Read more...
Toxic combinations
Editor's Choice
According to Panaseer’s latest research, 70% of major breaches are caused by toxic combinations: overlapping risks that compound and amplify each other, forming a critical vulnerability to be exploited.

Read more...
Cybersecurity operations done right
LanDynamix SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing Information Security
For smaller companies, the costs associated with acquiring the necessary skills and tools can be very high. So, how can these organisations establish and maintain their security profile amid constant attacks and evolving technology?

Read more...
New Edge AI Plus PTZ cameras with analytics
Products & Solutions Surveillance
IDIS has unveiled two new PTZ cameras that are NDAA-compliant, delivering AI auto-tracking, rapid 40x zoom, EIS image stabilisation, and advanced automated AI functionality.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.