printer friendly version

Onsite or remote monitoring? In-house or contractor?

There has been an ongoing debate for years on whether companies should have surveillance done on site, or if they should do it remotely. This debate has been complicated by the fact that much of the remote surveillance is done by contractors rather than in-house personnel. At iLegal 2016, Dr Craig Donald will unpack some of the issues and challenges of the onsite/remote debate and provide some criteria that should help decide on the optimal strategy for your surveillance system.

Craig has a wide range of experience of surveillance in both on-site and remote monitoring situations. He will look at the factors that influence which of these options is suited for your needs, the strength of the factors in the decision making process, and how they need to be considered as a whole to suit the surveillance strategy you are wanting to pursue.

The on-site/remote argument has also been affected by the in-house versus contracted debate. Craig will highlight what kinds of expectations you need to have and some of the ways to manage your control room and obtain the best overall solution and delivery for your surveillance function.

Share this article:

Further reading: