Return on TCO: why measure the cost of security?

December 2003 News & Events

Total cost of ownership (TCO) is not a new concept. Management teams at all levels have always wanted to define the real cost of resources in order to plan and manage budgets, but the pressures of today’s business environment have raised the profile of TCO once again. Boards are keen to measure the lifetime cost of virtually every asset and resource and calculate return on every investment – but how do you measure the value of security?

The equation of cost versus benefit becomes extremely difficult to solve when dealing with security. What price should an organisation put on the security of its systems? And what cost is justified in ensuring that these systems are continuously available and functioning? Not only are the risks of failure very high, but the complexity of the calculation across multiple sites, technologies and implementations that comprise a business' security infrastructure is significant.

The most common response to the above is to say you cannot put a cost on security - so people do not and TCO calculations are not applied. However, recent calculations have shown that this lack of transparency has led many businesses to massively over-pay for security and to become lax in the management of ongoing costs in this area.

Knowing TCO - a complex process

TCO seeks to define the total cost of an asset or resource over its lifetime, including initial purchase price, support contracts, servicing, upgrades, associated consumables and human resources to manage it. Analyst firm Gartner introduced the term over 15 years ago and since then it has been most commonly applied to computer systems and the related consumable materials (ink, toner, paper, etc). However, the concept is now being broadened to include almost every investment. Knowing the TCO is a vital first step in demonstrating to finance departments that money is being well spent.

The problem is that it is very complicated to measure TCO and there are few agreed approaches. With complex systems such as security and firewall implementations, it is not always clear what to measure and how. The first step is, therefore, to define what you need to measure in order to calculate TCO. We have divided the various costs into two groups: fixed and variable.

Fixed costs

Fixed costs are attached to the hardware, software and related support and maintenance contracts. Usually, these are all 'up-front' costs incurred at the time of the initial investment, including dedicated servers, firewall software and maintenance contracts. They are therefore easy to calculate and can also be spread across the life of the implementation for the purposes of the TCO calculation.

They also include annual maintenance costs charged by vendors and these can vary widely. Standard products based on the IBM/Intel platform tend to have lower annual maintenance costs and may be worth considering over specialised proprietary solutions. Users should also consider the whole software and hardware requirement in calculating these costs. Different topologies and infrastructures may lead to radically different maintenance costs - even though individual elements are broadly similar.

Variable costs

Then there are the broader variable costs: management of upgrades, on-going maintenance, telecommunications, training and cost of downtime. These are much harder to evaluate as they bring into consideration elements such as management time, estimates of usage and utilisation of company resources that are often not easy to price. Since many of these costs are internal overheads they are often not considered. However, they do have an impact on the overall cost and effectiveness of a solution.

As an example of how these costs can and should be calculated, let us look at a routine firewall upgrade and maintenance process. Firstly, three software elements must be considered: the operating system, the firewall/VPN itself and the high availability/load management software. On average it takes over two hours to upgrade the OS, about the same for the firewall and about half an hour for the high availability software. In addition, engineers will spend, on average, about 16 hours identifying and testing the combination of these three sub-systems. Therefore, the first node will take over 21 man-hours to upgrade. Even allowing for faster implementation on subsequent nodes (we calculate approximately five hours per node) a typical upgrade of 10 firewalls will take almost nine days! The impact on TCO of this level of management overhead is obviously huge.

The 'price' of downtime

Whatever the 'price' of firewall downtime, these regular costs are a drain on resources that could be spent elsewhere. Moreover, as human resources are constrained there is an opportunity cost associated with spending this much time regularly upgrading systems. Two outcomes are likely: either essential maintenance and upgrades are postponed or ignored due to time pressure, or other tasks are put off pending its completion. All these issues have an impact on the total cost of a solution. Additionally, consider the list price of the hardware and software, look at annual maintenance costs and investigate the likely resources necessary for upgrades, how frequent these will need to be and what impact they will have on your IT management resource.

A defensive asset

Ultimately, any discussion of TCO feeds into an assessment of return on investment. The difficulty with calculating the value of a security solution, and therefore the ROI, is that it is essentially a defensive asset. Unlike other IT investments, or investments in people and other assets, it is difficult to show the value that has derived from it. You cannot calculate the value of not having a virus, nor the value of successfully avoiding hackers. The only indications you may be able to use are the damage done to similar businesses by such acts. This makes ROI less useful in these situations, but strengthens the case for TCO. The presentation of a well-conducted TCO analysis to backup investment decisions will go a long way in convincing senior management that money has been spent well and with foresight.

Nigel Rix
Nigel Rix

For more information contact Nigel Rix, regional director UK, Ireland and South Africa for Stonesoft Networks.

Stonesoft Networks are exhibiting at Infosecurity Europe 2004, which is Europe's number one IT security exhibition. The event brings together professionals interested in IT security from around the globe with suppliers of security hardware, software and consultancy services. Now in its 9th year, the show features Europe's most comprehensive FREE education programme, and over 200 exhibitors at the Grand Hall at Olympia from 27 to 29 April 2004. www.infosec.co.uk





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Impro announces Primo update
News & Events Access Control & Identity Management Integrated Solutions
Impro Technologies recently held a launch event in which it introduced a series of new products, from new readers through to its updated Primo access management software.

Read more...
IQSight SmartSuite integration with XProtect
Surveillance News & Events AI & Data Analytics
Milestone Systems and IQSight have strengthened their collaboration with the release of SmartSuite, a consolidated plug-in suite for Milestone XProtect video management software, to cut installation time for system integrators by 70%.

Read more...
The future of smart living and connected security
Securex South Africa Smart Home Automation News & Events
From controlling access and surveillance remotely to managing energy use during blackouts, smart technologies are transforming how organisations and property owners operate, protect assets, and maintain uptime across residential and commercial environments.

Read more...
957 women killed in three months
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Despite years of summits, task teams and public commitments, South Africa’s femicide rate remains around five times higher than the global average, and too few are using the legal lifelines available.

Read more...
AURA appoints Taryn Winer as global head of people
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Following its €13,5 million Series B funding round last year and accelerating international expansion, particularly across the United States, AURA has appointed Taryn Winer as global head of people.

Read more...
Gallagher Security releases new fence controllers
Perimeter Security, Alarms & Intruder Detection News & Events
Gallagher Security has announced the release of its new F5 and F6 Fence Controllers, marking the latest generation of enhanced-safety, monitored-pulse fence technology, designed to meet the demands of modern security environments.

Read more...
Paxton set to launch game-changing new system
Paxton Access Control & Identity Management News & Events
Access control is evolving fast. Installers and end users are looking for systems that are simple to install, easy to manage remotely, and flexible enough to scale. In response, Paxton is exploring how emerging technologies can reshape access control.

Read more...
From the editor's desk: When the rules change
Technews Publishing News & Events
         Welcome to the SMART Surveillance & AI Handbook 2026. We were a bit nervous about including AI in the title, since it either has a good or bad reputation depending on the individual – very few people ...

Read more...
Proactive estate security in Cape Town
neaMetrics OneSpace Technologies Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions Fang Fences & Guards ATG Digital Editor's Choice News & Events Integrated Solutions Infrastructure Residential Estate (Industry)
SMART Security Solutions started the year with our annual SMART Estate Security Conference in Cape Town on 26 February 2026. Held at Anna Beulah Farm, the conference saw a number of delegates enjoying the farm’s excellent cuisine, while listening to outstanding presenters.

Read more...
The impact of misguided viral campaigns
News & Events Training & Education
For many years, traditional media have been perceived as slower, more inflexible, and less responsive compared to digital platforms. But in an ecosystem flooded with content, its value is becoming clearer: verification, context, and accountability.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.