Are you prepared for multinational risks?

1 July 2019 Security Services & Risk Management

In recent years, many organisations have established business continuity management programmes which define the different processes of avoiding and recovering from potential disasters to their business.

With the number one goal of a business continuity plan (BCP) serving to allow for continuation of operations while recovering from a disaster, the key component of the success of a BCP relies on the organisation’s resilience programme.

Resilience defined

The Business Continuity Institute defines resilience as the adaptive capacity of an organisation in a complex changing environment. Resilience is the more mature aspect of recovering from disaster which is the ability of an organisation to uphold its functions regardless of drastic changes in the internal and external environment.

Therefore, in their quest to achieve greater maturity in response to and recovering from disasters, an organisation must consider a tailor-made resilience program to enable continuation of business under adverse circumstances.

Resilience statistics

In its annual Africa Resilience survey, Ernst and Young (EY) discovered that although majority of African organisations have good BCPs, they also require a matured resilience programme to reduce the likelihood of exposure and increase their ability to recover from disruptive events when they happen.

The conclusions from the survey indicate that approximately 72% [Level 2 – Level 5] of the respondents reported that their resilience programme can assist in recovering business operations after a disaster. Of that number, 5% is certifiable and 28% can recover all critical functions within approved Recovery Time Objectives (RTO). Only 28% either cannot recover operations or the respondents do not know the maturity level of their programme.

Over 64% of the aggregated participants have indicated an alignment of their companies BCM resilience solutions, to international best practices, i.e. ISO 22301, ISO 22316, BS 65000, ISO 27031, the Business Continuity Institute Good Practice Guidelines 2013 and/or COBIT. Of the 64%, approximately 10% have specified that their companies are aligned to BS 65000 i.e. a guidance document on organisational resilience.

The survey further rated the resilience maturity of the sampled organisations in line with international standards on a five-point scale, with five being the most mature level:

With the survey having revealed that 5% of the sampled organisations have reached level 5, 28% level 4, 24% level 3, 15% level 2 and 10% level 1 maturity of business resilience. The remaining 18% of the respondents indicated an unknown level of resilience.

What this indicates is that although 72% of the respondents reported that their resilience programme can assist in recovering business after a disaster, only 5% have their risk management sources spread beyond the scope of traditional risk methods.

The need to be multinationally resilient

The complication with any organisation operating multinationally is that the nature of disasters become foreign, away from the home country. The best assurance any organisation can get against unknown material disruptive events is to align with international standards both at policy level and implementation.

A multinationally resilient organisation can reduce their vulnerability through adopting a resilience programme which gives them the opportunity to recover all critical functions within the approved RTO.

As a risk professional have you considered:

Business continuity management and resilience are a subset of risk management, both disciplines are a critical part of mitigation of certain risks.

• Sooner or later your business could grow multinationally. At some point in your business there’s contact with global customers or business partners. Have you considered your organisation’s exposure as a result of these relationships?

• Your employees might travel outside your home country exposing them to multinational risks. Have you added an emergency repatriation plan in your resilience programme?

• Some of your business recovery sites are sitting elsewhere in the world. Have you considered resilience backup if a disaster hits your recovery?

• For a multinational business, what infrastructure challenges in the other country similar to the local water and electricity challenges experienced in South Africa could impact on overall business continuity?

• For a multinational business, given the rise of cyber risk which holds no political boundaries, has the business considered the impact of system failure and the link to their cyber risk management controls?

• Is your business focusing on generic disaster scenarios or specific scenarios which may have a higher probability of occurrence such as power outages (local), political unrest depending on the economic state of the foreign country?

The most responsible decision of any organisation would be to be aligned with international business resilience standards and formally adopt these as part of the risk management and business continuity program, because in spite of everything, we are all part of the global community.

For more information on IRMSA please visit https://www.irmsa.org.za/





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Africa’s opportunity to shape the future of human-centred AI
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
Across the Global South, countries are not yet locked into decades of legacy AI systems, energy-intensive infrastructure, or governance frameworks designed for a different technological era. That creates something rare in technology development: a cleaner slate.

Read more...
AURA appoints Taryn Winer as global head of people
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Following its €13,5 million Series B funding round last year and accelerating international expansion, particularly across the United States, AURA has appointed Taryn Winer as global head of people.

Read more...
95% do not have full trust in cybersecurity vendors
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Trust in cybersecurity vendors is fragile, difficult to measure, and increasingly shaping risk posture at both operational and board levels. Lack of verifiable transparency undermines cybersecurity decision-making, according to Sophos-backed research.

Read more...
Understanding the Shared Responsibility Model
Infrastructure Security Services & Risk Management
While the cloud can certainly be a growth enabler in many ways, it can also introduce new security risks. Companies want to have a clear understanding of where their security duties end and where their cloud service provider’s begin.

Read more...
“This Is Theft!” SASA slams Mafoko Security
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Associations
The Security Association of South Africa (SASA) has issued a stark warning that the long-running Mafoko Security Patrols scandal is no longer an isolated case of employer misconduct, but evidence of a systemic failure in South Africa’s regulatory and governance structures.

Read more...
Making a mesh for security
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Credential-based attacks have reached epidemic levels. For African CISOs in particular, the message is clear: identity is now the perimeter, and defences must reflect that reality with coherence and context.

Read more...
Privacy by design or by accident
Security Services & Risk Management Infrastructure
Africa’s data future depends on getting it right at the start. If privacy controls do not withstand real-world conditions, such as unstable power, fragile last-mile connectivity, shared devices, and decentralised branch environments, then privacy exists only on paper.

Read more...
From friction to trust
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management Financial (Industry)
Historically, fraud prevention has been viewed as a trade-off between robust security and a seamless customer journey, with security often prevailing. However, this can impair business functionality or complicate the customer journey with multiple logins and authentication steps.

Read more...
Security ready to move out of the basement
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
Panaseer believes that in 2026, a board member at a major corporation will lose their job amid rising breaches and legal scrutiny, as organisations recognise that cyber risk is a business risk that CISOs cannot shoulder alone.

Read more...
Cyber remains top business risk, but AI fastest riser at #2
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
The Allianz Risk Barometer 2026 ranks cybersecurity, especially ransomware attacks, as the #1 risk, while AI is the biggest riser and jumps from #10 to #2, highlighting the emerging risks for companies in almost all industry sectors.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.