What to do in the face of growing ransomware attacks

Issue 8 2022 Information Security, Security Services & Risk Management


Doros Hadjizenonos.

FortiGuard Labs research found, last year, that the explosive growth in ransomware is mainly attributable to Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) becoming increasingly popular on the dark web. This allows cyber criminals to purchase plug-and-play ransomware to achieve a quick payday.

This means that every organisation is at risk. Cyber criminals demanding a ransom to unlock key data and systems are targeting, no matter how big or small, or what sector they operate in, organisations around the world. In many cases, even when ransoms are paid, organisations are unable to recover all their data, leading to costly downtime and reputational damage.

Know your enemy

FortiGuard Labs explains that there are five primary ransomware attacks by types:

• Crypto ransomware or encryptors: Probably one of the most well known variants, this malware encrypts various files and data within a system, making the infected content inaccessible without a decryption key. This can also include lockers.

• Lockers: Similar to encryptors, but they lock the user out of their system entirely. Generally, the lock screen will display the ransom and demands, and in severe cases, will include a countdown clock to pressure victims into paying.

• Scareware: A fake software that claims to have detected a virus or similar issue with your system and directs the user to pay to solve the issue. Some variants will lock the user from other functionalities of the system, while others will flood the screen with pop-up alerts without causing any damage.

• Doxware/leakware: As the name suggests, leakware threatens to distribute sensitive information or company files online and pressures the user into paying a fee to prevent data from entering into the public domain.

• Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS): Malware carried out and managed by a professional hacker. The service is paid for by an individual and all aspects of the attack – from the distribution of the malware to payment collection and access restore – are carried out by hired professionals.

Knowing how attacks are carried out and staying up to date with the ever-changing threat landscape, are crucial in mitigating risk.

Have a plan

Despite 67% of organisations in our 2021 Ransomware Survey Report indicating that they have been a ransomware target (16% say they were attacked three or more times), 96% felt they were at least moderately prepared for another attack. Less than half had a strategy that included such things as network segmentation (48%), business continuity measures (41%), a remediation plan (39%), testing of ransomware recovery methods (28%), or red team/blue team exercises (13%) to identify weaknesses in security systems. Preparation, including a solid incident response plan, is critical.

Avoid common mistakes that could increase attack impact

Among the most common mistakes organisations make is incomplete security coverage, and a lack of visibility into the entire environment, which can allow attackers to move laterally for some time before the breach is discovered.

Good security hygiene puts the organisation in the best position possible for protecting against ransomware and ensuring employees are properly trained on threat trends is paramount for prevention. It is also important to equip all systems with the latest in cybersecurity defence and detection solutions, with advanced endpoint detection and response (EDR) technology, for example, integrated and consolidated into a single platform. Deflecting attacks entirely or detecting them as soon as there is a breach, are among the best measures to protect assets. It is also crucial to have immutable copies of all backups for rapid recovery.

Organisations should not underestimate their risk: they need to be prepared for ‘when’ they are attacked, not ‘if’.

First steps

In the event of malware detection, or an actual attack launching, the incident response plan should indicate who should be notified first. This usually includes the cybersecurity management team, whether that is the CIO or security manager for an internal security operations centre (SOC) team. The attack can also be reported to the South African Cybersecurity Hub. The top priority should be bringing the attack to the attention of a trained security expert to contain and remediate as quickly as possible.

By gathering as much information on the source and nature of the attack, organisations can patch the system for future prevention. Moreover, by learning how the malware was able to access the network will expose the holes hackers were able to exploit.


Credit(s)




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

From the editor's desk: It’s all about data
Technews Publishing News & Events
      Welcome to the SMART Access and Identity Handbook 2026. We have slightly changed the handbook this year, specifically the selection guides, but there is still a lot of industry information inside, and ...

Read more...
Access trends for 2026
Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions RR Electronic Security Solutions Enkulu Technologies IDEMIA neaMetrics Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Infrastructure
The access control and identity management industry has been the cornerstone of organisations of all sizes for decades. SMART Security Solutions asked local integrators and distributors about the primary trends in the access and identity market for 2026.

Read more...
Beyond the fence
Technews Publishing Fang Fences & Guards SMART Security Solutions Perimeter Security, Alarms & Intruder Detection Access Control & Identity Management
In a threat landscape characterised by sophisticated syndicates, harsh environmental conditions, and unstable power grids, a static barrier is no longer a defence; it is merely a brief delay.

Read more...
Zero Trust access control
Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions CASA Software NEC XON Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Zero Trust Architecture enforces the rule of ‘never trust, always verify’. It changes an organisation’s security posture by assuming that threats exist both inside and outside the perimeter, and it applies to information and physical security.

Read more...
Holding all the cards
neaMetrics Suprema SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing Access Control & Identity Management
After so many years of offering alternatives to card technology for access control, one could be forgiven for assuming we are all using biometrics or mobile credentials for all our physical and digital access requirements.

Read more...
Integrated security key to protecting cloud applications
Infrastructure Information Security
Cloud-native applications have transformed the way businesses operate, enabling faster innovation, greater agility, and enhanced scalability. Yet this evolution brings an equally complex security landscape.

Read more...
Factories, grids, and finance: Critical infrastructure cyber lessons of 2025
Asset Management Information Security Industrial (Industry)
Africa has seen an accelerated, large-scale digitisation of our overall industrial base, and this rapid convergence of IT and OT is happening on a foundation that, in essence, was not designed to be cybersecure.

Read more...
Axis signs CISA Secure by Design pledge
Axis Communications SA News & Events Surveillance Information Security
Axis Communications has signed the United States Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Secure by Design pledge, signalling the company’s commitment to upholding and transparently communicating the cybersecurity posture of its products.

Read more...
Eight African cybersecurity trends for 2026
Information Security
Check Point Software Technologies has released eight critical trends shaping Africa’s digital turning point in 2026, noting that their implementation will require the government, the private sector, and key civic institutions to cooperate.

Read more...
The year of the agent
Information Security AI & Data Analytics
The dominant attack patterns in Q4 2025 included system-prompt extraction attempts, subtle content-safety bypasses, and exploratory probing. Indirect attacks required fewer attempts than direct injections, making untrusted external sources a primary risk vector heading into 2026.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.