Disaster recovery vs cyber recovery

Issue 3 2025 Information Security

As ransomware attacks become increasingly common, businesses must understand the difference between traditional disaster recovery (DR) and cyber recovery (CR) strategies. While DR centres on restoring IT operations following events like natural disasters, hardware failures or accidents, CR is specifically tailored to address intentional cyberthreats such as ransomware and data breaches.

Traditionally, DR included elements of cyber response to attacks. However, in recent years, cyberattacks have become so sophisticated and severe that they are now differentiated from DR for several reasons.

A significant factor is the changing nature of attack vectors. Today’s cyberattacks employ various methods, resulting in greater complexity compared to traditional DR, which has now undergone significant classification changes in the past decade.

DR generally focuses on natural disasters, equipment malfunctions and accidental events, so when these situations arise, organisations need to activate their DR plan to ensure business continuity is restored. It is crucial to note that DR plans are often considered a component of the system rather than part of broader business continuity management (BCM).


Hemant Harie.

Significant skills required

It is essential to understand that the elements of CR have always existed in the IT world. However, they are now more defined and evolved, as the sophistication of modern cyberattacks requires significant skills to deal with.

For instance, in a DR scenario, a major data loss might be due to a spilt cup of coffee or an accidental deletion, and the response would be to restore the data from backups without much hesitation. In contrast, CR involves more caution. Before restoring data, one must ensure that the data and the restore location are clean and secure. This is because cyberattacks can compromise both production and backup environments. Therefore, the recovery process involves verifying the integrity and security of the data and the environment to prevent re-infection.

Mitigation plan

Another significant differentiator is the mitigation plan. In DR, mitigation involves having multiple copies of data easily accessible for quick restoration. In CR, mitigation includes security hardening of the backup platform and implementing threat detection within the backup environment. Thus, DR planning and mitigation plans must be complemented by CR mitigation plans, which are distinct components.

The evolution of cyberattacks also touches on the broader topic of data protection and management. Traditional backup methods involved scheduled backups, often to tape, which were then stored off-site. Modern data protection, however, requires continuous data protection, where data is constantly being created and needs to be protected in real-time. This shift moves away from snapshot-based backups to a more continuous and instantaneous recovery approach.

Hence, immutable backups have become essential because they ensure that once data is written, it cannot be altered or deleted. This is crucial in a CR scenario because it guarantees that the backup data remains untainted and reliable, even if the production environment is compromised. Immutable backups provide a secure foundation for recovery, allowing organisations to restore clean data and confidently resume operations.

Regular testing

The need for regular testing has also evolved. Traditional DR testing often involved tabletop exercises, which are no longer sufficient for cyber recovery. CR testing must be more comprehensive, involving verifying accessibility, forensics and cleanliness strategies. This requires more frequent and detailed testing to ensure that all elements of the CR plan are effective. Regular testing helps identify and close gaps that may not be detectable on paper, ensuring that the recovery process is robust and reliable.

Modern enterprises must transition from traditional backup methods to modern solutions that offer continuous data protection to ensure their data is consistently backed up and can be quickly restored in case of an incident. At the same time, they must evolve their backup systems to include robust CR strategies. This involves preparing for and mitigating the impact of cyberattacks, ensuring that their data can be recovered swiftly and securely.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Compressing cyberattack timelines and targeting ungoverned AI identities
Information Security News & Events
Sophos AI Security 2026 report finds attackers are moving beyond experimentation and operationalising AI for attacks using identity as the primary initial access vector, rather than inventing new attack types.

Read more...
Zero-touch automation certificate life cycle management loop
Products & Solutions Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
ManageEngine completes the certificate life cycle management loop with CA-agnostic, zero-touch automation. New post-deployment automation in Key Manager Plus removes the last manual step in certificate renewal as lifespans gradually shrink to 47 days

Read more...
Sophos launches AI-native cybersecurity defence system
News & Events Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Built for a threat landscape reshaped by AI, Sophos Fusion unites security operations, endpoint, network security, identity, email, and cloud into one defence system that prevents, detects, investigates, and responds at AI speed.

Read more...
Ungoverned AI agents and deepfakes pose critical threats
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Global study reveals 64% of South African organisations already deploy autonomous AI agents with little to no governance, while 63% of employees admit they are unlikely to be able to spot attacks such as deepfakes

Read more...
How ‘TikTok Brain’ is breaking legacy security training
Training & Education Information Security
Between doomscrolling, rapid-fire Slack notifications, and algorithmic video feeds, the average employee is trapped in an aggressive, highly engineered dopamine loop that automatically shuts down in traditional training situations.

Read more...
Quantum is coming
Infrastructure Information Security
The global cybersecurity landscape is approaching a turning point as quantum computing accelerates faster than most organisations realise; the shift is not a distant, theoretical concern, but a present-day business risk that demands immediate action.

Read more...
Outpacing cyberthreats in the age of AI
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing News & Events Information Security
SMARTpod talks to Fred Streefland, Global Field CISO for EMEA at Check Point Software Technologies, about framing modern cyber defence around adaptability, rapid decision-making, and the OODA loop adapted for cybersecurity.

Read more...
Prompt injection is the new phishing
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
AI security is heading in an uncomfortable direction following Microsoft’s research showing how prompt injection can be chained to remote code execution vulnerabilities in AI agent frameworks, including work involving Semantic Kernel

Read more...
Cybersecurity needs actual intelligence before artificial intelligence
Information Security AI & Data Analytics
Cybersecurity depends on interpretation. A tool can tell you that something unusual has happened, but people need to determine whether it is a genuine risk, the business impact, and how to respond without causing unnecessary disruption.

Read more...
Duxbury Cybersecurity sharpens reseller offering
Duxbury Networking Information Security News & Events
Duxbury Networking has strengthened its Duxbury Cybersecurity business unit by adding WatchGuard and Cynet, giving South African resellers broader, more integrated coverage for the security risks customers are now asking them to address.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.