IPV is not CCTV

CCTV Handbook 2005 Surveillance

This article is not about CCTV. It is about surveillance cameras and the solutions that sit behind them. It is about IP video (IPV).

Why do I start with making that point so emphatically? It is because the term CCTV is loosely used to cover all kinds of camera surveillance systems, but the differences between CCTV and IPV are so profound that is very misleading to lump them under one label.

CCTV as we all know is closed circuit television, and the key word is closed. IPV, on the other hand, is transmission of video signals over Internet Protocol (IP). The openness of the Internet is something everyone is familiar with, and indeed that is one of the major differentiators of IPV: video signals can be transmitted as easily to the other side of the planet as to a desk in reception, bandwidth permitting. The pictures can be made available to anyone, anywhere. That is not always desirable of course, but with signal encryption and firewalls, access can be controlled.

Modern businesses, almost without exception, run over IP-based data networks and link to partners and remote offices over the public Internet, and home networks and Internet access are commonplace, so the carrier for IPV is everywhere.

The implications are wide-ranging. A head office can see what is going on in their offices, warehouses and stores around the country or the world; individuals can look in on their homes whilst travelling overseas; parents can monitor their children at playschool; security companies can get automatic feed of video from the premises of their clients as soon as an alarm is triggered; and so on - the openness of the Internet makes myriad applications possible that could not even be thought of with CCTV.

The other big difference between IPV and CCTV has already been mentioned in passing, but needs to be put in clear relief: IPV runs over existing cables and infrastructure. This has positive and negative aspects. On the positive side, it means the physical deployment of IPV is greatly simplified as much of the time the data cabling will already go to or near the points where you want to place your cameras, and the cables themselves are inexpensive. Nearly all networks run over Ethernet as the physical layer, and there is a standard for transmitting power over Ethernet cables known as 802.3af, or more simply, PoE. With PoE, a standard Ethernet cable carries both data and power, making deployment even simpler.

The negative side is that because IPV runs over the existing data networks, the video reticulation has to be designed in conjunction with the IT department as it will affect the network design and will be sharing bandwidth with the existing network traffic. Most modern businesses run 100 Mbps Ethernet, often with 1 Gbps links between hubs. An IPV camera at 5 fps will typically use less than 1 Mbps, but multiple cameras, high resolution or high frame rate requirements, and the fact that not all of the nominal bit-rate of Ethernet is available for use can mean that video has a significant impact on the network. There are many factors that modify this, such as cameras that vary their frame rate depending on motion detected, and different encoding schemes, which need to be understood and borne in mind. There is some learning to be done on the part of the camera installers and the IT departments.

A third difference is that IPV cameras generally have more intelligence in the cameras themselves. For example, a camera can be configured not to send any data back until a trigger occurs, such as motion detection (and perhaps only motion in certain portions of the image), or an input switch from a door or boom contact, whereupon it will send back information for, say, 10 seconds before and 20 seconds after the trigger.

A fourth factor is the always-important bottom line: what does it cost? As a general rule of thumb, the cameras are more expensive because of the technology and intelligence built into them, but the system cost is lower. System cost is reduced by lower installation costs and because the storage and processing of video data uses commodity PC and server hardware, and in particular because standard hard drives are used.

IPV is not CCTV: it is a whole new game with many new possibilities.

Roy Alves
Roy Alves

Roy Alves is the managing director of SCS Distribution, he can be contacted at [email protected]



Credit(s)




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Safer spaces through smart surveillance
NEC XON Surveillance
Advances in facial recognition technology are transforming surveillance from a mere recording tool into an intelligent, integrated system that enhances real-time safety, moving beyond the traditional expansion of CCTV efforts.

Read more...
Next generation of AI-powered video telematics
IoT & Automation Surveillance Transport (Industry)
Webfleet, Bridgestone’s fleet management solution in South Africa, has launched Webfleet Video 2.0, an AI-powered solution designed to enhance fleet safety, security, compliance with local regulations and operational efficiency through real-time video insights.

Read more...
Key design considerations for a control room
Leaderware Editor's Choice Surveillance Training & Education
If you are designing or upgrading a control room, or even reviewing or auditing an existing control room, there are a number of design factors that one would need to consider.

Read more...
Smart cities and the role of video security
Surveillance Integrated Solutions
As cities around the world continue to embrace smart technology, including IoT that not only connects to people, but also the surrounding activity, the integration of advanced video security systems is crucial to ensure safety and efficiency in environments.

Read more...
How intrusion protection helps secure O&G operations
Surveillance Perimeter Security, Alarms & Intruder Detection Industrial (Industry)
For O&G operators in Africa, physical security remains one of the biggest considerations, particularly when it comes to perimeter protection and the ability to mitigate intruder-related incidents.

Read more...
Axis secures the Waterfront
Surveillance Entertainment and Hospitality (Industry) Retail (Industry)
Axis Communications shares insight into its longstanding partnership with the V&A Waterfront, one of Africa’s premier retail and mixed-use precincts, through its latest, updated customer success story.

Read more...
Advanced surveillance storage from ASBIS
Infrastructure Surveillance Products & Solutions
From a video storage solutions perspective, SkyHawk drives, designed for DVRs and NVRs, offer high capacity, optimised firmware, and a reliability workload rating of hundreds of terabytes per year.

Read more...
Open and collaborative logistics systems
Hikvision South Africa Surveillance Logistics (Industry) AI & Data Analytics
E-commerce and other high-volume logistics operations need open and collaborative technology ecosystems that drive efficiencies, throughput and digital transformation. Hikvision discusses the benefits of harnessing open and collaborative systems in the logistics market.

Read more...
4K HDR camera for mobility
Surveillance Transport (Industry)
e-con Systems has introduced a 4K HDR front-view camera, engineered to deliver reliable, long-range imaging for mobility applications such as delivery robots, autonomous vehicles, and off-road vehicles.

Read more...
The future of the surveillance channel
Duxbury Networking Technews Publishing Elvey Security Technologies SMART Security Solutions Surveillance
The video surveillance market has evolved from camera-based specifications to integrated solutions that solve customers’ problems. Moreover, the growth of AI and cloud has changed the channel even more, with more to come.

Read more...