Disaster recovery vs business continuity vs data loss prevention

Issue 4 2023 Security Services & Risk Management


Jim Morrison.

In mid-May, the Western Cape Parliament's technology systems went offline after a cyberattack. While this event was undoubtedly bad for productivity, they could at least recover from the attack thanks to data backups, business continuity, and disaster recovery plans.

Every business must have such measures in place, says Jim Morrison, Account Manager at Sithabile Technology Services. "The simple fact is that it's easy to become a cybercrime victim, experience catastrophic equipment failure, or an employee accidentally loses important data. That's why we tend to say 'when, not if' about cyber risks, especially cyberattacks. Unfortunately, automated tools and the low risk of prosecution means cybercrime is as opportunistic as a street mugging. If you want to reduce risks from cyberattacks and employee mistakes, you need to have both prevention and cure in place. Business continuity and disaster recovery plans can cover both those bases."

Yet despite often being used interchangeably, Business Continuity (BC) and Disaster Recovery (DR) are different. So is Data Loss Prevention (DLP). How can you tell the difference between BC, DR and DLP?

Building a resilient business

The concept of resilience has become very popular since the pandemic. Books such as Antifragile and Grit inform discussions on how people and organisations can reduce harm from unexpected changes and challenges.

Yet while we can cover volumes on exploring resilience, it's a straightforward proposition for an organisation,” says Morrison. "Business resilience is about how well your operations can resist negative disruption or recover from such disruption. It's like losing the keys to your office front door; how quickly can you find a replacement key and open up so that people can get to work?"

The cornerstone of business resilience is business continuity planning, supported by disaster recovery and reinforced by data loss prevention.

Business continuity: BC is there to help an organisation continue operating through a disruptive event, and BC planning is to identify critical operational areas, then put policies and processes in place to help those through planned and unexpected disruptions.

Disaster recovery: As the name suggests, DR steps in when something goes wrong. Specifically, it focuses on recovering technology systems and data in the event of a disaster, bringing them back to operational status.

Data loss prevention: DLP is an ongoing effort to track and secure data through policies and processes, often automated, preventing accidental losses or intentional data theft.

The resilience pyramid

Business continuity is the strategic master plan. It determines what is important, what could threaten those critical areas, how to reduce those risks, and what to do when something goes wrong. Disaster recovery often guides the tangible parts of that strategy, particularly for assets: what data or applications are important, how they are being backed up, and the appropriate timelines and priorities to recover systems. Data loss prevention aims to prevent disaster recovery by determining measures such as encryption, access controls, and employee training.

"You can visualise resilience as a pyramid. Business continuity is at the top, while disaster recovery and data loss prevention form the foundations. You make BC plans, then use DLP to support prevention and DC to support recovery," says Morrison. "If you don't know where to start, always start with BC planning. That's your guiding light. Once you have a grasp on BC needs, you'll see where DR and DLP fit in."

The pyramid of business continuity, disaster recovery and data loss prevention form the most robust approach against cyber-related risks and help mitigate many other disruptions, such as fires, equipment failure and even loss of people. And if done correctly, it helps employees be more productive inside a highly secure business.

Hence, why it's important to distinguish these three disciplines. But while their definitions are straightforward, every business has unique needs. Poorly designed interventions can be worse than none since they create a false sense of security, and ample gaps for criminals to exploit.

"BC, DR and DLP are not just products you pull from a shelf or a cloud app store. They need alignment with your business. It's worth the effort to engage with professionals to put the right measures in place. When disaster strikes, you'll be glad you did, because if you don't have a plan, all you'll get is chaos."

For more information, contact Sithabile Technology Services, www.sithabile.co.za




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

The line between locking residents out and restricting their access
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Residential Estate (Industry)
A June 2026 High Court judgment has clarified one of the most contested issues in modern estate governance: when an HOA's digital access restrictions amount to unlawful self-help or spoliation, and when they do not.

Read more...
Modernise field communications with Push-to-Talk over Cellular
Products & Solutions Security Services & Risk Management
Sentiv is bringing Hytera’s Push-to-Talk over Cellular (PTToC) portfolio to organisations that need a more structured and controlled way to coordinate field teams, without extending a full private radio model to every team, site, or function.

Read more...
SAFPS urges taxpayers to remain alert to fraud
Security Services & Risk Management News & Events
The SAFPS warns taxpayers about evolving SARS scams this tax season, highlighting common fraud tactics, practical prevention tips, and trusted reporting channels to stay protected.

Read more...
Zero-touch automation certificate life cycle management loop
Products & Solutions Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
ManageEngine completes the certificate life cycle management loop with CA-agnostic, zero-touch automation. New post-deployment automation in Key Manager Plus removes the last manual step in certificate renewal as lifespans gradually shrink to 47 days

Read more...
Fire safety in South Africa
Technoswitch Fire Detection & Suppression Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions Fire & Safety Security Services & Risk Management Editor's Choice
Fire safety is sometimes ignored, sometimes relegated to whatever is cheapest, and sometimes treated with the seriousness it deserves, given that it focuses on protecting life and assets. SMART Security Solutions asked Brett Birch, MD of Technoswitch, for some insights into the realities of fire safety in South Africa.

Read more...
Nimbus remote fire alarm management
Technoswitch Fire Detection & Suppression Security Services & Risk Management Fire & Safety
Nimbus connects key stakeholders to their fire alarm systems, simplifying compliance with fire safety standards and greatly improving visibility into critical events, thereby augmenting first responder processes that save lives and protect assets.

Read more...
Sophos launches AI-native cybersecurity defence system
News & Events Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Built for a threat landscape reshaped by AI, Sophos Fusion unites security operations, endpoint, network security, identity, email, and cloud into one defence system that prevents, detects, investigates, and responds at AI speed.

Read more...
Stop supplier fraud at the moment of payment
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Cape Town-built platform bridges the gap between onboarding and transaction by securing identity inside the live channels where companies exchange invoices and banking details.

Read more...
Ungoverned AI agents and deepfakes pose critical threats
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Global study reveals 64% of South African organisations already deploy autonomous AI agents with little to no governance, while 63% of employees admit they are unlikely to be able to spot attacks such as deepfakes

Read more...
A risk-based approach to fire safety
Fire & Safety Security Services & Risk Management Industrial (Industry) Agriculture (Industry)
A report by fire engineering consultancy ASP Fire is challenging blanket assumptions around combustible-core sandwich panels, arguing instead for a rational, risk-based approach that balances fire safety requirements with commercial realities in sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing and industrial processing.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.