Enhancing the security of your applications

Issue 7 2021 Information Security

Is software part of how you are delivering value to your customers? But how is your organisation innovating through software?

Software adds value, but it also introduces risk. Let’s take the example of Equifax, described as a data ‘mega-breach’ that exposed the personal information of 147 million people and was caused by an application vulnerability that cost the company more than US$2 billion, with about US$700 million in settlements alone. The company went on to become the subject of US congressional hearings as well as several investigations.

The interesting thing about this is that they had application security tools in place, so what went wrong?

Veracode has partnered with companies to deliver application security programmes since 2006 and here are the most common reasons the company sees why secure software initiatives fail.

No remediation

Firstly, AppSec programmes fail when developers are not engaged or empowered to fix vulnerabilities and security teams are only incentivised to find weaknesses, but not to remediate them. Too often, security teams dictate rather than partner with development teams and have unrealistic expectations. The mountain of technical debt can be enormous and developers are often not trained to fix potential liabilities. The net result is a toxic relationship between security and development.

Complex tools

Secondly, tooling is difficult to manage and many solutions require weeks, if not months, of deployment before they are able to conduct the first scan. Then come the operational headaches, plus scalability and high availability issues. Maintaining solutions can be challenging, leaving businesses months behind coverage for the language and framework versions their development teams are using.

To busy putting out fires

Thirdly, security teams are often busy running scans and keeping infrastructure up to date that they simply don’t have time to focus on the programme itself. They’re in a vicious cycle and don’t have the headcount to deliver an holistic AppSec programme that gets stakeholders aligned on the vision and roadmap for it. Reporting the correct metrics to C-Level executives on successes is difficult and hence programmes continue to be underfunded.

Veracode’s approach to application security addresses these three areas:

Veracode provides a unified solution for all major application analysis types, languages, and frameworks. This helps companies to consolidate point solutions that would otherwise have to be managed separately, which can lead to complex deployments, operations and reporting. Veracode solutions integrate with the development pipeline so that analysis can be fully automated.

Veracode helps businesses to scale their security teams by engaging and empowering security champions within companies’ development teams. It guides teams towards targeted training; if one team has a higher frequency of the same security issue, it focuses its programmes on fixing vulnerabilities, not just finding them, so organisations don’t end up in the same position as Equifax.

Finally, it assists security teams with AppSec governance. This starts by helping businesses to define a programme to achieve compliance with internal policies, contractual requirements, regulatory mandates. It helps companies to scale programmes through best practices that we have developed over 15 years while working with over 2500 customers. Furthermore, it can also assist with selling the value of AppSec programmes to senior management, development teams and even customers.

Most AppSec programmes forget that there is only one role that can fix security finding and that`s the developer. Yet, many of them don’t empower developers to do so and focus their programmes on finding flaws and not fixing them.

Veracode offers developers three types of advice that delivers a high percentage of fixes. Firstly, they receive automated advice from Veracode’s solution in the form of text or video tutorials. Secondly, they can reach out to peers in the Veracode Community and see if they can find a solution there. Thirdly, they can schedule a call with a secure coding expert to go through the source code together and discuss approaches to fixing the issue. The Veracode approach makes this much easier because its consultants can view the data and control flow of the application to suggest the best way to fix issues.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Highest increase in global cyberattacks in two years
Information Security News & Events
Check Point Global Research released new data on Q2 2024 cyber-attack trends, noting a 30% global increase in Q2 2024, with Africa experiencing the highest average weekly per organisation.

Read more...
Phishing attacks through SVG image files
Kaspersky News & Events Information Security
Kaspersky has detected a new trend: attackers are distributing phishing emails to individual and corporate users with attachments in SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) files, a format commonly used for storing images.

Read more...
Crypto in SA: between progress and precaution
Information Security
“As cryptocurrency gains momentum and legitimacy, it’s becoming increasingly important for people to pay attention to financial security”, says Richard Frost, head of technology and innovation at Armata Cyber Security.

Read more...
Cyber recovery requires a different approach to disaster recovery
Information Security
Disaster recovery is about getting operations back on track after unexpected disruptions; cyber recovery, however, is about calculated actions by bad actors aiming to disrupt your business, steal sensitive data, or hold your system hostage.

Read more...
MDR users claim 97,5% less
Sophos Information Security
The average cyber insurance claim following a significant cyberattack is just $75 000 for MDR users, compared with $3 million for endpoint-only users, according to a new independent study.

Read more...
The impact of GenAI on cybersecurity
Sophos News & Events Information Security
Sophos survey finds that 89% of IT leaders worry GenAI flaws could negatively impact their organisation’s cybersecurity strategies, with 87% of respondents stating they were concerned about a resulting lack of cybersecurity accountability.

Read more...
Efficient, future-proof estate security and management
Technews Publishing ElementC Solutions Duxbury Networking Fang Fences & Guards Secutel Technologies OneSpace Technologies DeepAlert SMART Security Solutions Editor's Choice Information Security Security Services & Risk Management Residential Estate (Industry) AI & Data Analytics IoT & Automation
In February this year, SMART Security Solutions travelled to Cape Town to experience the unbelievable experience of a city where potholes are fixed, and traffic lights work; and to host the Cape Town SMART Estate Security Conference 2025.

Read more...
Kaspersky KATA 7.0 for targeted attack protection
Information Security Products & Solutions
] Kaspersky has announced a major update to its Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack (KATA) including enhanced network detection and response (NDR) capabilities with deeper network visibility, internal threats detection and other critical security features.

Read more...
The role of advanced technologies in ransomware recovery
Information Security
As businesses increasingly adopt cloud technologies, the complexities of maintaining resilience and ensuring rapid recovery from such incidents become even more pronounced. The integration of advanced technologies is essential to navigate these challenges effectively.

Read more...
Cybersecurity best practice
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Breach and attack simulation has become an essential element of cybersecurity strategies in any modern business by allowing companies to actively detect and resolve vulnerabilities through real-world attack simulations.

Read more...