PoPIA: How the ‘Operator’ must use personal information

Issue 2 2021 Security Services & Risk Management

As the Protection of Personal Information Act (PoPIA) is only three months away from being enforced, organisations and responsible parties have had to gain an in-depth understanding of the rules and regulations that must be adhered to. While much focus has been placed on the roles and responsibilities that must be fulfilled to meet the standards of PoPIA, the role of the Operator must also be highlighted.

“The Operator plays a vital function and as such it is crucial that his/her duties and responsibilities are adequately understood. The Responsible Party is charged with ensuring that the personal information obtained is protected, but it is the Operator who actually uses the data provided,” explains Carrie Peter, solution owner at Impression Signatures.


Carrie Peter.

The Operator can be a person, a system, or a third-party service provider that works in conjunction with the Responsible Party but is not necessarily under the authority of the Responsible Party. The Operator’s primary responsibility is to process the information obtained from the data subject for its intended purpose, i.e., making sure that the information is being utilised for the purpose for which consent was given. If the Operator is a third-party provider and not causally linked to the organisation, consent will need to be obtained from the data subject for the Operator to process the personal information.

“Consent is of the highest importance within PoPIA. The data subject must be informed and give consent for the purpose and use of the personal information, as well as each individual organisation or entity that will have access to this information to fulfil the required purpose,” continues Peter.

Due to the Operator not being under the direct authority of the Responsible Party, the Responsible Party will require evidence and assurance from the Operator that all necessary standards and regulations are being adhered to. This is because, although the Operator is not under the Responsible Party’s authority, the Responsible Party is still accountable for what the Operator does with the personal information at hand.

This is an important point to highlight because it means that responsible parties must be sure of the Operators with which they work. It is imperative that the Operators are vetted and can prove their compliance to the required standards as outlined by PoPIA and included in a contract that will be signed between the Operator and the Responsible Party.

“The Operator may not utilise the data for any purpose other than the original and explicitly stated purpose under which it was obtained. The Operator may also not utilise any information without the permission and knowledge of the Responsible Party. The Operator is responsible for immediate notification to the Responsible Party if it is believed that the data was accessed by an unauthorised individual and/or entity,” she adds.

The Operator will have to ensure, and be able to prove, that the data obtained was utilised for its intended purpose; that the processing of the information was done under the instruction and authorisation of the Responsible Party; that safeguards were put into place to ensure that the data is protected while being processed; that the highest level of ethical and confidential rules and regulations were adhered to in the processing of the information; and that corrective measures were implemented in instances where a breach of data has occurred.

“The Operator has a very delicate job. If you think of the Responsible Party as a hospital theatre, the Operator is the surgeon. The Operator is not only responsible for processing the information for its intended purpose (although this is the primary function), but the Operator must also ensure that this processing is done with the highest level of confidentiality,” concludes Peter.

While Responsible Parties are charged with the duty of ensuring that the data is protected, Operators carry a similar responsibility within their processing procedures. These two roles, although often performed by separate entities, are part of the same whole. It is a partnership through which all rules and regulations as outlined by PoPIA must be complied with.

As part of Impression Signature’s PoPIA Campaign, smaller businesses shouldn’t be precluded from being able to comply with the Act simply because they don’t have large budgets. To this end, the Impression Campaign offers free guidance, simplifying the roles and responsibilities to empower all companies to comply.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

The line between locking residents out and restricting their access
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Residential Estate (Industry)
A June 2026 High Court judgment has clarified one of the most contested issues in modern estate governance: when an HOA's digital access restrictions amount to unlawful self-help or spoliation, and when they do not.

Read more...
Modernise field communications with Push-to-Talk over Cellular
Products & Solutions Security Services & Risk Management
Sentiv is bringing Hytera’s Push-to-Talk over Cellular (PTToC) portfolio to organisations that need a more structured and controlled way to coordinate field teams, without extending a full private radio model to every team, site, or function.

Read more...
SAFPS urges taxpayers to remain alert to fraud
Security Services & Risk Management News & Events
The SAFPS warns taxpayers about evolving SARS scams this tax season, highlighting common fraud tactics, practical prevention tips, and trusted reporting channels to stay protected.

Read more...
Zero-touch automation certificate life cycle management loop
Products & Solutions Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
ManageEngine completes the certificate life cycle management loop with CA-agnostic, zero-touch automation. New post-deployment automation in Key Manager Plus removes the last manual step in certificate renewal as lifespans gradually shrink to 47 days

Read more...
Fire safety in South Africa
Technoswitch Fire Detection & Suppression Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions Fire & Safety Security Services & Risk Management Editor's Choice
Fire safety is sometimes ignored, sometimes relegated to whatever is cheapest, and sometimes treated with the seriousness it deserves, given that it focuses on protecting life and assets. SMART Security Solutions asked Brett Birch, MD of Technoswitch, for some insights into the realities of fire safety in South Africa.

Read more...
Nimbus remote fire alarm management
Technoswitch Fire Detection & Suppression Security Services & Risk Management Fire & Safety
Nimbus connects key stakeholders to their fire alarm systems, simplifying compliance with fire safety standards and greatly improving visibility into critical events, thereby augmenting first responder processes that save lives and protect assets.

Read more...
Sophos launches AI-native cybersecurity defence system
News & Events Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Built for a threat landscape reshaped by AI, Sophos Fusion unites security operations, endpoint, network security, identity, email, and cloud into one defence system that prevents, detects, investigates, and responds at AI speed.

Read more...
Stop supplier fraud at the moment of payment
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Cape Town-built platform bridges the gap between onboarding and transaction by securing identity inside the live channels where companies exchange invoices and banking details.

Read more...
Ungoverned AI agents and deepfakes pose critical threats
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Global study reveals 64% of South African organisations already deploy autonomous AI agents with little to no governance, while 63% of employees admit they are unlikely to be able to spot attacks such as deepfakes

Read more...
A risk-based approach to fire safety
Fire & Safety Security Services & Risk Management Industrial (Industry) Agriculture (Industry)
A report by fire engineering consultancy ASP Fire is challenging blanket assumptions around combustible-core sandwich panels, arguing instead for a rational, risk-based approach that balances fire safety requirements with commercial realities in sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing and industrial processing.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.