Mobile malware: a myth buster

October 2011 Information Security

Amit Klein, Trusteer CTO, explodes the myths and dispels the fantasies of mobile malware.

We are all wise to the risks our online antics pose to our security. We have learned not to trust e-mails from Nigerian Bankers offering to share millions in exchange for a small upfront handling fee. Our banks have not monitored fraudulent activity so they do not need us to verify our account details by confirming our information. Messages from DHL with attachments informing us about deliveries we are not expecting do not fool us into opening the document. We are even wise to the links in e-mails that want us to visit websites and win prizes. Why do they not work? Because we have learned the hard way.

When these scams first started circulating people fell for the lies. Some of you will remember, or heard about, the chaos caused in 2000 when people opened an attachment to find out who loved them and spread the I Love You worm. In a single day it travelled around the world causing an estimated $5,5 billion in damages.

So, why are people not heeding the warning that malware has gone mobile and taking steps to protect themselves? The reality is there is a false sense of security surrounding mobile use, especially as victims currently are few and far between, but I am here to dispel the myths and banish the fantasy.

Myth one: Mobile operating systems are sandboxed, so we are safe

Anyone that still believes this is true is living in fantasy land. We have already seen malware that attacks sandboxing – DroidDream is just one that recently made the headlines. It exploited a vulnerability in the android operating system and obtained root privileges, downloading and installing additional arbitrary pieces of software, to assume virtually limitless control of the infected smartphone.

Myth two: Mobile applications are controlled – Apple and Google are watching our backs

Anyone that still believes this myth has a serious case of loyalty overload. DroidDream was found in applications that were being sold through the Google app store proving that the semi-closed, or walled garden, approach that is supposed to protect our mobile devices and prevent malware from infecting the device is flawed.

The simple reason is Google et al want, and actively encourage, developers to create apps with just a $25 entry fee. It is unsurprising that malware writers and spammers are happy to flex their muscles and get a piece of the action. Rogue developers all too easily can get permission or approval to upload their infected applications – that is what they did with DroidDream.

Myth three: There is no money in mobile malware so fraudsters are not interested

Wake up people – we are already in the middle of a third generation of financial malware. Zero generation had users unwittingly dialling premium numbers or sending SMS texts to services that charged them for the privilege

First generation was malware that engaged simple tricks, for example changing the host file of an infected device and redirecting the user’s mobile browser to a phishing site.

Second generation has seen malware increasingly infect the mobile device that works in conjunction with malware already infecting the desktop. In case you are not sure how this scam works, basically malware infects the mobile device and steals SMS verification messages and reroutes them to the fraudster.

The next generation of mobile malware will actually attack the mobile device focusing on mobile browsers or mobile applications themselves to abuse the current users session and commit fraudulent transactions, possibly even with the unintended aid of the user. While at the moment, this could be argued as myth it will not be long before it becomes reality, we are just waiting for banks to introduce the service. Fraudsters have all the tools they need to effectively turn mobile malware into the biggest customer security problem we have ever seen. They are lacking one thing – customer adoption.

I said at the start of this article that people need to heed the warning that malware has gone mobile and taking steps to protect themselves. As I am sure you will agree, I have proven it is not only possible but is happening, so it is time to start affording your smartphone the same protection you do the PC.

www.trusteer.com





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Compressing cyberattack timelines and targeting ungoverned AI identities
Information Security News & Events
Sophos AI Security 2026 report finds attackers are moving beyond experimentation and operationalising AI for attacks using identity as the primary initial access vector, rather than inventing new attack types.

Read more...
Zero-touch automation certificate life cycle management loop
Products & Solutions Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
ManageEngine completes the certificate life cycle management loop with CA-agnostic, zero-touch automation. New post-deployment automation in Key Manager Plus removes the last manual step in certificate renewal as lifespans gradually shrink to 47 days

Read more...
Sophos launches AI-native cybersecurity defence system
News & Events Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Built for a threat landscape reshaped by AI, Sophos Fusion unites security operations, endpoint, network security, identity, email, and cloud into one defence system that prevents, detects, investigates, and responds at AI speed.

Read more...
Ungoverned AI agents and deepfakes pose critical threats
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Global study reveals 64% of South African organisations already deploy autonomous AI agents with little to no governance, while 63% of employees admit they are unlikely to be able to spot attacks such as deepfakes

Read more...
How ‘TikTok Brain’ is breaking legacy security training
Training & Education Information Security
Between doomscrolling, rapid-fire Slack notifications, and algorithmic video feeds, the average employee is trapped in an aggressive, highly engineered dopamine loop that automatically shuts down in traditional training situations.

Read more...
Quantum is coming
Infrastructure Information Security
The global cybersecurity landscape is approaching a turning point as quantum computing accelerates faster than most organisations realise; the shift is not a distant, theoretical concern, but a present-day business risk that demands immediate action.

Read more...
Outpacing cyberthreats in the age of AI
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing News & Events Information Security
SMARTpod talks to Fred Streefland, Global Field CISO for EMEA at Check Point Software Technologies, about framing modern cyber defence around adaptability, rapid decision-making, and the OODA loop adapted for cybersecurity.

Read more...
Prompt injection is the new phishing
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
AI security is heading in an uncomfortable direction following Microsoft’s research showing how prompt injection can be chained to remote code execution vulnerabilities in AI agent frameworks, including work involving Semantic Kernel

Read more...
Cybersecurity needs actual intelligence before artificial intelligence
Information Security AI & Data Analytics
Cybersecurity depends on interpretation. A tool can tell you that something unusual has happened, but people need to determine whether it is a genuine risk, the business impact, and how to respond without causing unnecessary disruption.

Read more...
Duxbury Cybersecurity sharpens reseller offering
Duxbury Networking Information Security News & Events
Duxbury Networking has strengthened its Duxbury Cybersecurity business unit by adding WatchGuard and Cynet, giving South African resellers broader, more integrated coverage for the security risks customers are now asking them to address.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.