Has your intellectual property been stolen?

August 2010 Information Security

While snooping continues to rise, IT security is making it harder for insiders to get around controls that protect highly sensitive information.

The results of Cyber-Ark Software’s fourth annual Trust, Security and Passwords global survey show that 35% of respondents believe their company’s highly sensitive information has been handed over to competitors. 37% of the IT professionals surveyed cited ex-employees as the most likely source of this abuse of trust.

While perhaps not surprising that disgruntled workers top the list, it is noteworthy that 28% suspected 'human error' as the next most likely cause, followed by falling victim to an external hack or loss of a mobile device/laptop, each at 10%. The most popular information shared with competitors was the customer database (26%) and R&D plans (13%).

Cyber-Ark’s fourth annual Trust, Security and Passwords global survey is the result of interviews conducted in the Spring of 2010 with more than 400 senior IT professionals both in the US and UK, mainly from enterprise-class companies.

There was little year-over-year change in the number of respondents who suspected the loss of intellectual property to a competitor, indicating that more needs to be done to protect companies’ most valued assets. Additionally, to address vulnerabilities related to human error that could expose a proprietary database or financial information, organisations must employ additional layers of control such as the ability to grant privileges to sensitive data and systems on-demand. This limits innocent mistakes by allowing access to information only when users need it to perform a particular task or query.

Adam Bosnian
Adam Bosnian

Snooping on the rise

The research also confirmed that snooping continues to rise within organisations both in the UK and the US. 41% of respondents confessed to abusing administrative passwords to snoop on sensitive or confidential information – an increase from 33% in both 2008 and 2009. When examining the information that people were willing to circumvent the rules to access, US respondents targeted the customer database first (38% versus 16% in the UK) with HR records most alluring to UK respondents (30% versus 28% in the US).

Despite the rise, there was also the admission that organisations are trying to better curb snooping and are installing stronger controls to prevent these incidents. Based on this year’s survey, 61% responded they could circumvent those controls – a decrease from 77% in 2009. Additionally, 88% of IT professionals believe their use of these privileged accounts should be monitored, however only 70% of organisations actually attempt to do so – with one-third turning a blind eye to what is happening within their networks and therefore failing to meet regulatory and compliance requirements. Insider sabotage, unfortunately and rather disconcertingly, has increased from 20% last year to 27% this year.

Speaking about the results, Cyber-Ark’s executive vice president Americas and corporate development, Adam Bosnian commented, “While we understand that human nature and the desire to snoop may never be something we can totally control, we should take heart that fewer are finding it easy to do so, demonstrating that there are increasingly effective controls available to better manage and monitor privileged access rights within organisations. With insider sabotage on the increase, the time to take action has already passed and companies need to heed the warnings.

“It is the organisation’s obligation to protect its sensitive information and intellectual property. Failing to do so, in our opinion, makes the company as bad as those who are abusing their privileged positions. Let us face it, you might as well sell the information to the highest bidder yourself – that way at least you will have some control over who has got it.”

IT the best at snooping

The survey found that 67% of respondents admitted having accessed information that was not relevant to their role. When asked what department was more likely to snoop and look at confidential information, more than half (54%) identified the IT department, likely a natural choice given the group’s power and broad responsibility for managing multiple systems across the organisation. Of note, this is an up-tick compared to the 35% who identified the IT department as likely suspects in 2009, a number that had decreased from 47% in 2008. Respondents identified Human Resources the next curious at

11%, followed by administrative assistants.

To download a detailed report of the survey results, please visit http://www.cyber-ark.com/constants/white-papers.asp





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Highest increase in global cyberattacks in two years
Information Security News & Events
Check Point Global Research released new data on Q2 2024 cyber-attack trends, noting a 30% global increase in Q2 2024, with Africa experiencing the highest average weekly per organisation.

Read more...
Upgrade your PCs to improve security
Information Security Infrastructure
Truly secure technology today must be designed to detect and address unusual activity as it happens, wherever it happens, right down to the BIOS and silicon levels.

Read more...
Open source code can also be open risk
Information Security Infrastructure
Software development has changed significantly over the years, and today, open-source code increasingly forms the foundation of modern applications, with surveys indicating that 60 – 90% of the average application's code base consists of open-source components.

Read more...
DeepSneak deception
Information Security News & Events
Kaspersky Global Research & Analysis researchers have discovered a new malicious campaign which is distributing a Trojan through a fake DeepSeek-R1 Large Language Model (LLM) app for PCs.

Read more...
SA’s strained, loadshedding-prone grid faces cyberthreats
Power Management Information Security
South Africa’s energy sector, already battered by decades of underinvestment and loadshedding, faces another escalating crisis; a wave of cyberthreats that could turn disruptions into catastrophic failures. Attacks are already happening internationally.

Read more...
Almost 50% of companies choose to pay the ransom
News & Events Information Security
This year’s Sophos State of Ransomware 2025 report found that nearly 50% of companies paid the ransom to get their data back, the second-highest rate of ransom payment for ransom demands in six years.

Read more...
Survey highlights cost of cyberdamage to industrial companies
Kaspersky Information Security News & Events
The majority of industrial organisations estimate their financial losses caused by cyberattacks to be over $1 million, while almost one in four report losses exceeding $5 million, and for some, it surpasses $10 million.

Read more...
Digital economy needs an agile approach to cybersecurity
Information Security News & Events
South Africa is the most targeted country in Africa when it comes to infostealer and ransomware attacks. Being at the forefront of the continent’s digital transformation puts South Africa in the crosshairs for sophisticated cyberattacks

Read more...
SIEM rule threat coverage validation
Information Security News & Events
New AI-detection engineering assistant from Cymulate automates SIEM rule validation for SecOps and blue teams by streamlining threat detection engineering with automated testing, control integrations and enhanced detections.

Read more...
Cybersecurity a challenge in digitalising OT
Kaspersky Information Security Industrial (Industry)
According to a study by Kaspersky and VDC Research on securing operational technology environments, the primary risks are inadequate security measures, insufficient resources allocated to OT cybersecurity, challenges surrounding regulatory compliance, and the complexities of IT/OT integration.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.