Practical perspectives in evaluating digital surveillance systems

May 2003 CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring

I recently attended a review session in a company evaluating options for a full digital surveillance system. With a new control room function being built, the time was ripe for the company to consider the move to digital, something that many other companies are considering.

This includes a fully networked system operating from a remote site with the potential use of PC monitors and digital recording devices. My knowledge of technical systems and specifications is very limited, but I was invited to attend because of my exposure to the management of different operations and human factor issues. The comments in this article in no way represent a recommendation of how digital systems should be reviewed, but reflect my own increasing awareness of some of the factors that came up in the discussions.

The first thing that struck me was that it was the IT specialist who was calling the meeting and requesting the security personnel to attend. IT had been given the mandate by the security manager to investigate and review possible options because it was felt that they were the people most suited to the task in the organisation.

This is a departure from the usual security approach, but is something that is probably going to happen increasingly as CCTV digital solutions become more common unless security departments acquire these skills or people themselves. The IT specialist also demonstrated a planned, well considered set of criteria and system demands that were going to be relevant to an operational system. This was aimed at facilitating an objective evaluation on how well the different options and equipment would suit the needs of security personnel. I am sure many security personnel could have done the job as well, but my practical experience indicates that IT practice does bring in a structured method of evaluating systems that can benefit projects and can be used by other disciplines including security.

Different perspectives

It is also clear that people involved in reviewing digital systems approach things from different perspectives. IT specialists, engineers, and security technicians all have different orientations in their view of the technical capabilities and priorities. However, it is notable that different security people can also see things from vastly differing perspectives. Some features are seen as important by some people, and not even bothered with by others. The quality of recorded video is also an issue that people take different views on, sometimes to their cost according to some sites I have seen that have gone the digital route. Because each security person was coming from a different perspective on what they were interested in, the IT specialist had to see if he could satisfy these different demands within the system. The importance of having an objective outsider to facilitate objective decision making and to avoid group think was something that struck me as particularly useful. One of the dangers of having the senior security person determining key criteria is that people often tend to defer to him or her. The other thing that struck me is how important it is to have the different user perspectives and needs cleared up before choosing and implementing the system.

The second major impression is how the quality of digital recording is open for debate and how easily operational requirements for one aspect may get lost when considering another. There are a number of advantages to digital systems, but for me the key purpose of the system is to produce image quality on monitors that will allow recognition of incident conditions, and to produce recorded information that will satisfy requirements for a number of purposes. In the discussion, I identified four major aspects that I thought were relevant to satisfy before one could even think of the advantages of the digital system.

1. Can the system handle the data requirements from all relevant cameras at the resolution and frame rate required?

2. Is the visual quality of picture presented on monitors to operators at an appropriate quality to allow detection of relevant details, movement, and objects, and can viewing be done comfortably over a sustained period?

3. Is the quality of recorded data of a suitable quality for review and audit purposes?

4. Is recorded data of an appropriate quality to present for evidence purposes?

I am sure that operational requirements for different organisations would involve a number of additional areas to consider. However, the above points for me involve the minimum requirements for a digital system. If it cannot deliver an appropriate level of picture quality from the necessary sources for specified purposes, then all the other advantages become somewhat irrelevant.

High-end systems

The third major impression in the discussions we had highlights the advantages that software interaction can produce with digital systems. The use of a graphics user interface to manage displayed screens or analyse and process data brings in a number of potential advantages on high-end digital systems. Features that struck me as useful for management and investigation included a variety of search capabilities and the ability to use graphics to chart utilisation, performance and camera detection issues. While not enthusiastic about matrix screens with more than one camera view being displayed simultaneously, the ability to call up configurations of screens around a specific area should there be an incident could have major advantages in seeing the presence of people and objects and where people are moving. Cameras that require little observation and where anything that occurs is very obvious, such as somebody standing at a door, could also be grouped together for space-saving purposes.

Different digital systems have different feature sets, and companies may choose to go to various extents in implementing a fully digital CCTV system. However, it has become clear to me that the process of identifying whether digital is suitable, and if so, which system is right is not an easy process. It is also one that is going to increasingly combine both security and IT input. Getting a well planned assessment program to evaluate the different options is going to be a critical part of ensuring the choice of system produces the right outcomes.

Dr Craig Donald is an industrial psychologist and specialist in human factors in security and CCTV. He is the co-developer of the Surveillance and Monitoring Assessment Exercise (SAMAE) for the selection and placement of CCTV operators and presenter of the CCTV Surveillance Skills training course. He can be contacted on telephone: 011 787 7811, fax: 011 886 6815, or e-mail: craig.donald@leaderware.com





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Mitigating the human risk
Issue 5 2020, Managed Integrity Evaluation, Technews Publishing, iFacts , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Hi-Tech Security Solutions asked Jennifer Barkhuizen and Jenny Reid for some information around background screening and vetting of potential new hires.

Read more...
Teaching old cameras new tricks
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Deep Data , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Dr Jasper Horrell and Mark Smuts from DeepAlert reveal how estates can upgrade their existing surveillance infrastructure to include the latest AI-enhanced analytics, without buying new hardware.

Read more...
Thermal continues to evolve
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Technews Publishing, Axis Communications SA, Bosch Building Technologies, Dahua Technology South Africa , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Thermal cameras have made an enormous impact to perimeter security, with more to come as artificial intelligence enhances analytics.

Read more...
Automated estate protection
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Axis Communications SA , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Marlenique Estate makes use of an end-to-end Axis Communications solution, installed by Energize Technology Africa for automated security. Automated estate protection.

Read more...
Integrated security management system
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Protoclea Advanced Image Engineering , Products, CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring, Integrated Solutions
Phorcas is a security information system developed by Protoclea designed to integrate multiple sub-systems into a powerful crime fighting solution.

Read more...
Serverless ANPR solution
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, XtraVision , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring, Products
Serverless ANPR automatically controls the movement of up to 1000 listed cars through barriers and provides carpark management information.

Read more...
Bosch launches a fully open camera platform
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Bosch Building Technologies , Products, CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Bosch has announced the launch of INTEOX, a new camera platform designed to modernise the security and safety industry.

Read more...
IP 3000i cameras with built-in analytics
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Bosch Building Technologies , Products, CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Bosch IP 3000i cameras extend smart video surveillance to general security applications.

Read more...
Arteco Video Event Management Software
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, XtraVision , Products, CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Arteco views video analytics as an enhancement to the video security experience and not as a costly addition or complication to standard video management.

Read more...
Vehicle and driver identification
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Protoclea Advanced Image Engineering , Products, CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring, Perimeter Security, Alarms & Intruder Detection
Detecta features vehicle identification (make and model), automated number plate recognition (ANPR), vehicle colour recognition, driver identification, high speed and free flow detection.

Read more...