A real security solution

January 2013 Security Services & Risk Management

I want to tell you a story about why an independent security risk assessment is different from a risk assessment done by a security provider.

Andre Mundell
Andre Mundell

A few years back a new client phoned us with a recurring problem. Criminals had captured one of the guards on the premises and used his radio to establish the whereabouts of the rest of the security team. After capturing the entire security staff, they had been able to rob the company of assets worth thousands.

The client had switched security providers only to have this scenario repeated another four times. Each of these security providers had ostensibly performed a security risk assessment on the property, but they had all recommended solutions which matched the services and products that they offered rather than tailoring solutions to their client’s needs.

We were then asked to do a security risk assessment on the premises in question.

After identifying all the relevant issues the client finally understood how and where the criminals were gaining access to the property and came to the following conclusions:

* The previous security companies had not considered effective lighting options.

* They had not considered thermal products while the neighbourhood and premises itself were very dark, and some of these security providers did not even know the basics of how thermal products work.

Because of the size and layout of the premises, we suggested the following:

* That their security service provider (Company A) be retained and allowed inside the premises.

* Because of the fact that criminals always managed to overpower and take these guards captive, we recommended that another security service provider (Company B), be placed on the outside of the premises in plain clothes.

After a few months, the same criminals attacked the client’s premises again. Company A had not been made aware of Company B, and there was no radio link between the two. This meant that the criminals also had no knowledge of Company B. Company B saw the guards from Company A being overpowered, reacted accordingly by informing the SAPS and their own armed reaction vehicles and in the end, the criminals were apprehended.

The above is a classic example of why security service providers cannot do security risk assessments, and also why they cannot tell you when they find risks that cannot be handled by one of their services or products. Hence the fact that it is imperative that companies employ the services of independent security risk assessors who will suggest real solutions to eliminate the client’s security risks as identified and explained in the final assessment. This in turn will allow the client to ensure that those risks are properly addressed as per the solutions suggested in the security plan.

No security company will advise a client to hire their competition to protect one area while they themselves protect another. Being independent and unaffiliated we were able to see the real risks involved and made solution based suggestions based on the client’s individual and working environment security needs.

It is better that a security risk assessment is done by an independent security risk assessor. Assessors cannot do an objective security risk assessment or ensure relevant and correct solutions if they are affiliated to any security provider or supplier.

Companies requesting security usually assume that their appointed security provider has done a security risk assessment; and most security providers will say that they have done a risk assessment. However, they will have performed a product assessment, not a security risk assessment. Security providers cannot and in most cases will not reveal your true risks to you.

I would like to stress to all corporate MDs, CEOs and small business owners the importance of protecting your company’s assets and employees. Gather all your facts before accepting any proposal for security services or products.

I again want to emphasise the fact that security providers and suppliers are not equipped to do security risk assessments. The fact that they are mandated to perform any and all assessments to reflect their service or product as the best option for you restricts them from being able to do effective and objective security risk assessments.

For more information contact Alwinco, +27 (0)71 319 4735, [email protected], www.alwinco.co.za





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Detect procurement fraud before losses escalate
Security Services & Risk Management News & Events Financial (Industry) Editor's Choice
Organisations need to move procurement fraud prevention closer to the point where suspicious activity occurs, rather than relying primarily on investigations after money has already been lost, according to SAS and FACTS Consulting.

Read more...
R45 billion private security sector’s growing liability gap
Security Services & Risk Management
Constitutional Court and appellate decisions shine a spotlight on the potentially massive civil liability that security companies could face for operational failures and, in certain circumstances, the conduct of employees – exposure often not covered by public liability insurance.

Read more...
AI fraud is outrunning banking defences
Security Services & Risk Management Financial (Industry)
South Africans are increasingly being targeted by AI-generated fraudsters who sound just like bank employees. However, many local banks are still struggling with legacy tech, slow change processes, and limited data visibility.

Read more...
AI assistants learn bad workplace habits
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
An employee under pressure at a logistics firm finds a productivity-boosting shortcut. Instead of manually parsing a 40-page supplier contract, they paste the confidential PDF into a public generative AI tool for a quick summary.

Read more...
Mining's critical controls are not the problem; execution is
Security Services & Risk Management Mining (Industry)
As Parliament considers amendments intended to strengthen managerial responsibility, employer accountability, enforcement and penalties under the Mine Health and Safety Act, Alvarez & Marsal warns that tougher rules must be matched by stronger execution at the rockface.

Read more...
Shadow AI: The next evolution of Shadow IT
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
Today, as AI gains traction in all aspects of life and business, African organisations face a new challenge, known as ‘Shadow AI’, where employees at all levels make use of AI without considering the potential impact.

Read more...
Free live travel risk map covering multiple countries
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Most widely cited travel risk maps are published once a year as static documents, but risk conditions do not follow a publishing calendar. The Sicuro map draws on official travel advisories from the ...

Read more...
Unrest readiness is built between crises, not during them
Technews Publishing Security Services & Risk Management
The 30 June marches passed largely peacefully, and that outcome was no accident. It was the result of preparation, and a level of cooperation between police, private security, communities and business that this country has not always managed.

Read more...
The line between locking residents out and restricting their access
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Residential Estate (Industry)
A June 2026 High Court judgment has clarified one of the most contested issues in modern estate governance: when an HOA's digital access restrictions amount to unlawful self-help or spoliation, and when they do not.

Read more...
Modernise field communications with Push-to-Talk over Cellular
Products & Solutions Security Services & Risk Management
Sentiv is bringing Hytera’s Push-to-Talk over Cellular (PTToC) portfolio to organisations that need a more structured and controlled way to coordinate field teams, without extending a full private radio model to every team, site, or function.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.