Going through the motions: looking at the history of video motion detection (VMD)

CCTV Handbook 2007 CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring

Much has been written about the potential for VMD. Initially, the enthusiasm amongst installers and end-users alike was matched only by the enthusiasm of manufacturers that seemed to suddenly fill the marketplace in an attempt to seize the 'opportunity' and claim the VMD 'space'. But then it all started to go wrong.

End-users began to experience unacceptable levels of false alarms. The time to install VMD systems - and particularly the fine-tuning and commissioning - took too long, and there was an overall impression that the cost simply was not worth the grief that went with it.

Concerns were expressed. The manufacturers thought the installers were at fault; the installers the manufacturers. In reality, both had a point. Some of the earliest technologies were over-complicated to install, but some installers were also using the technology inappropriately, in the wrong applications. Nuisance alarms from flying birds, or at night from moths flying too close to the cameras were a constant headache. Even cameras mounted on long poles, swaying in the wind would trigger an alarm, but was that the fault of the technology, or was it the fault of poor design and installation? The jury is out.

Given the history, why now should an installer look at the issue of video motion detection?

From a technical perspective, most video motion detection technologies are considerably more advanced than they were a decade ago:

* Smarter algorithms make them more capable of filtering out such things as car headlights, tree shadows, snow, rain, even the reflection of water from puddles, all of which could have previously triggered a false alarm.

* Target sizing is similarly more accurate: cats, birds, rabbits and other small mammals can be easily discriminated and ignored, and alarms generated by camera shake and scene wobbles can similarly be rejected.

Advances in technology have also helped in terms of ease of installation:

* Quick set-up features means a smaller number of parameters to be taken into consideration.

* Connectivity with other devices is also much easier. A device to another device from the same manufacturer is a straightforward Ethernet connection; a device to third-party technologies is via contact outputs and a series of interfaces.

Ease of installation has meant that the cost of install has dramatically fallen, because the speed of set up and commissioning is that much faster. The benefit of a VMD system over, say, a PIR, is that the VMD can be (largely) set up inside. Yes, a walk test is required, but if this is recorded and then replayed from the system for each camera, then this can be done without having to battle the elements come wind, rain or shine!

Unit costs have also fallen, again as a result of the march of technology. The approximate cost per unit today is the same as the cost per unit 15 years ago, so it is commensurately (ie when the cost of inflation is factored in) considerably less. The installer is still able to command a higher sale value, however, since the overall site installation costs are similar to using multiple PIRs.

One of the real advantages of video motion detection today is the help it gives in delivering a BS8418 compliant installation. BS8418 requires that detection must be in the view of the camera; since VMD only detects from the view of the camera, then compliance is by definition automatic. Not so for PIRs.

Of course, there is still an environment in which video motion detection is ideally suited: the space between two fences on a perimeter, for example, protecting a prison or military installation, where there is little in the way of undergrowth, or movement from passers-by or vehicles. But VMD is also appropriate in more everyday scenarios. VMD is about 'volumetric' detection: whatever a camera sees, it will detect. With technology such as it is, trees and other incumbents can be easily masked out if they are in the field of view, to prevent false alarming. VMD can also detect the direction of movement of a target, eg people leaving a building can be ignored, if the requirement is to know who is approaching.

VMD technologies are now more reliable, and have distinct advantages over other detection technologies in particular applications:

* Fence vibration systems do not detect vehicles entering a site.

* PIR detectors are similarly unreliable against vehicles when the heat source of the individuals inside is being masked by the lack of heat from the vehicle they are in.

* PIRs have to be seen; they cannot be disguised whereas VMD is discreet.

Although more sophisticated, in many respects VMDs are more straightforward to comprehend than before, and certainly easier to install. And even if there is an issue, help is never far away. Perhaps now is the time to take another look at VMD with an open mind.

For more information contact Anthony Rosenbaum, CMT Trading, +27 (0)11 704 4411, anthonyr@cmtcctv.co.za, www.cmtcctv.co.za



Credit(s)




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Mitigating the human risk
Issue 5 2020, Managed Integrity Evaluation, Technews Publishing, iFacts , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Hi-Tech Security Solutions asked Jennifer Barkhuizen and Jenny Reid for some information around background screening and vetting of potential new hires.

Read more...
Hochiki Europe’s L@titude system distributed by XtraVision
Issue 5 2020, XtraVision , Fire & Safety
Hochiki Europe’s L@titude range of fire alarm control is both sophisticated, yet simple to use.

Read more...
XtraVision moves to new premises
Issue 5 2020, XtraVision , News
Hot on the heels of the company changing hands, XtraVision, a distributor of electronic security and fire solutions in Africa and South America, has relocated.

Read more...
Teaching old cameras new tricks
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Deep Data , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Dr Jasper Horrell and Mark Smuts from DeepAlert reveal how estates can upgrade their existing surveillance infrastructure to include the latest AI-enhanced analytics, without buying new hardware.

Read more...
Thermal continues to evolve
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Technews Publishing, Axis Communications SA, Bosch Building Technologies, Dahua Technology South Africa , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Thermal cameras have made an enormous impact to perimeter security, with more to come as artificial intelligence enhances analytics.

Read more...
Automated estate protection
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Axis Communications SA , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Marlenique Estate makes use of an end-to-end Axis Communications solution, installed by Energize Technology Africa for automated security. Automated estate protection.

Read more...
Integrated security management system
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Protoclea Advanced Image Engineering , Products, CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring, Integrated Solutions
Phorcas is a security information system developed by Protoclea designed to integrate multiple sub-systems into a powerful crime fighting solution.

Read more...
Serverless ANPR solution
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, XtraVision , CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring, Products
Serverless ANPR automatically controls the movement of up to 1000 listed cars through barriers and provides carpark management information.

Read more...
Bosch launches a fully open camera platform
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Bosch Building Technologies , Products, CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Bosch has announced the launch of INTEOX, a new camera platform designed to modernise the security and safety industry.

Read more...
IP 3000i cameras with built-in analytics
Residential Estate Security Handbook 2020, Bosch Building Technologies , Products, CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring
Bosch IP 3000i cameras extend smart video surveillance to general security applications.

Read more...