Common myths, misconceptions and paranoia about information security

November 2008 Information Security

As organisations embark on an information security management programme, they encounter a threat landscape that contains both real and perceived obstacles that distract them from business priorities, according to Gartner. It is the perceived obstacles that cause organisations to direct their security investments to the wrong places, thereby lowering the value of their overall information security programmes.

Gartner research director Andrew Walls said security professionals need to qualify threats that are reasonably anticipated, and dispel those which are pure myths, misconceptions, or based on paranoia of the unknown.

“While change remains constant and threats continue to grow and evolve, we can take stock of the situation and establish an understanding of the threat landscape,” said Walls. “What we do know is that we cannot address all possible threats, but we can qualify the threats that are real and identify those that are not. This is an important step towards containing security costs.”

Myths, misconceptions and paranoia

According to Gartner, some of the most common myths about security include:

* The hackers are winning.

* Security is a retreating action.

* Data breaches are increasing in frequency.

* Application and operating system security is the responsibility of the vendors and they are working hard to protect us.

* Regulatory compliance covers 100% of the security needs for most organisations.

* Hackers actually help the industry by finding problems and publicising them.

* Security is there to stop business from doing anything.

* Quality of security equals money invested in security infrastructure and personnel.

“Increasing business demand for flexible security services, coupled with an already limited security budget, means that organisations can only afford to focus their resources on real issues,” said Walls. “This means the security department must become adept at identifying the real threats to ensure that security becomes an enabler for business innovation, rather than an inhibitor.”

Approaching security as a reactionary control will not resolve or minimise the risks, Walls said.

“In fact, tactical responses to changes in threats and business processes can consume the entire security budget but will not enable the business to move ahead in a safe and flexible manner,” he said.

Demonstrating security as the business enabler

According to Gartner, security must be viewed as the environmental or hazmat suit for the business. Security should be seen as a tool that can be used to accept risks so that the business can take advantage of market opportunities it was never able to before.

For example, it was previously believed that that the Internet was not a safe environment for conducting business and that wireless networking technologies were not secure. In both instances, the security department created a framework for operating within an understood, managed and accepted risk profile. Today, organisations worldwide depend on the Internet and wireless technologies as primary channels for conducting business.

“Security has been beaten into submission over the last few years by being accused of always saying no and preventing the business from aggressive change and innovation. It is time to regain the trust of the organisation and build understanding of the true role of security within business,” said Walls.

According to Gartner, if security is to uphold its position as the business enabler rather than an impediment, its interactions with business stakeholders must:

* Focus on business issues, not security technology and processes.

* Develop realistic security performance expectations with defined metrics.

* Build stakeholder confidence in security management frameworks and practices.

* Promote the redesign of business processes into more secure models.

* Realise that, at the end of the day, security is a costly, but necessary, evil.

Recommendations

While business innovation races ahead, security managers must grapple with expanding regulatory requirements, tight labour markets and shrinking or static security budgets. These pressures are forcing security managers to communicate the truth about the threat landscape, dispel myths and misconceptions, and enable the business to invest in the right security programme.

For more information contact Lisa Lawlor, Gartner Africa, +27 (0)21 790 3526, [email protected]





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Highest increase in global cyberattacks in two years
Information Security News & Events
Check Point Global Research released new data on Q2 2024 cyber-attack trends, noting a 30% global increase in Q2 2024, with Africa experiencing the highest average weekly per organisation.

Read more...
What does Agentic AI mean for cybersecurity?
Information Security AI & Data Analytics
AI agents will change how we work by scheduling meetings on our behalf and even managing supply chain items. However, without adequate protection, they become soft targets for criminals.

Read more...
Phishing attacks through SVG image files
Kaspersky News & Events Information Security
Kaspersky has detected a new trend: attackers are distributing phishing emails to individual and corporate users with attachments in SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) files, a format commonly used for storing images.

Read more...
Crypto in SA: between progress and precaution
Information Security
“As cryptocurrency gains momentum and legitimacy, it’s becoming increasingly important for people to pay attention to financial security”, says Richard Frost, head of technology and innovation at Armata Cyber Security.

Read more...
Cyber recovery requires a different approach to disaster recovery
Information Security
Disaster recovery is about getting operations back on track after unexpected disruptions; cyber recovery, however, is about calculated actions by bad actors aiming to disrupt your business, steal sensitive data, or hold your system hostage.

Read more...
MDR users claim 97,5% less
Sophos Information Security
The average cyber insurance claim following a significant cyberattack is just $75 000 for MDR users, compared with $3 million for endpoint-only users, according to a new independent study.

Read more...
The impact of GenAI on cybersecurity
Sophos News & Events Information Security
Sophos survey finds that 89% of IT leaders worry GenAI flaws could negatively impact their organisation’s cybersecurity strategies, with 87% of respondents stating they were concerned about a resulting lack of cybersecurity accountability.

Read more...
Efficient, future-proof estate security and management
Technews Publishing ElementC Solutions Duxbury Networking Fang Fences & Guards Secutel Technologies OneSpace Technologies DeepAlert SMART Security Solutions Editor's Choice Information Security Security Services & Risk Management Residential Estate (Industry) AI & Data Analytics IoT & Automation
In February this year, SMART Security Solutions travelled to Cape Town to experience the unbelievable experience of a city where potholes are fixed, and traffic lights work; and to host the Cape Town SMART Estate Security Conference 2025.

Read more...
Kaspersky KATA 7.0 for targeted attack protection
Information Security Products & Solutions
] Kaspersky has announced a major update to its Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack (KATA) including enhanced network detection and response (NDR) capabilities with deeper network visibility, internal threats detection and other critical security features.

Read more...
The role of advanced technologies in ransomware recovery
Information Security
As businesses increasingly adopt cloud technologies, the complexities of maintaining resilience and ensuring rapid recovery from such incidents become even more pronounced. The integration of advanced technologies is essential to navigate these challenges effectively.

Read more...