classic | mobile
Follow us on:
Follow us on Facebook  Share via Twitter  Share via LinkedIn
 

Search...
Hi-Tech Security Solutions Business Directory


Six 'gotchas' of disaster recovery
February 2012, Security Services & Risk Management

The images and stories coming out of Japan following the devastating earthquake and tsunami and recently repeated in end-of-year reviews, inevitably lead to people wondering, “What would I do if the earth moved or water flooded my state, city or neighbourhood?”

The floods in Thailand in late 2011 that have resulted in hard drive shortages are another example of disasters that can affect business continuity.

From a business perspective, much of disaster planning revolves around all-important data backup and recovery processes. Whether a disruption is the result of a cataclysmic event or a hardware malfunction, real business continuity cannot be maintained in this digital age without off-site backup. However, offsite data backups are no magic solution for disaster recovery. There is a lot more to the story.

Many factors can complicate the recovery process if businesses are not careful. Here are six of the biggest issues organisations may face as they plan for continuity.

Philip Lieberman, CEO and president, Lieberman Software
Philip Lieberman, CEO and president, Lieberman Software

Backup activation keys and licensing

Application data is not much good if your company has not backed up the activation keys and licensing necessary to restore its software licences. Many organisations forget how important it is to keep duplicates of the activation and licensing information in safe and redundant locations to ensure a quick recovery after a disruption.

Securely store encryption keys

Similarly, encrypted backup tapes are about as useful as doorstops when an organisation loses its encryption key information. Recent public-sector data breaches have proven that organisations cannot get by with keeping backup data unencrypted. This makes it critical for you to plan and execute a key management strategy; you will need to think about how keys will be stored and recovered to assure a smooth data recovery process

Account for application customisations

Many organisations will spend millions of pounds on consulting fees to create customised modules and settings for enterprise software only to see it all go up in smoke following a disaster. A big mistake businesses often make is to back up all of the appropriate application data but forget about duplicating customisation information. Remembering to fill this gap ahead of time can not only save money, but also prevent prolonged business disruption following an incident.

What if a super user is incapacitated?

The saga of Terry Childs, the former San Francisco city network administrator who refused to divulge key infrastructure passwords to his bosses, should teach all organisations the lesson that it is never wise to entrust all of your critical account login information to one super user. This is a single point of failure in privileged identity that can be particularly painful if an individual who keeps critical login information in his or her head passes away.

Childs eventually saw the light after some jail time, but if the keeper of your organisation’s password secrets is no longer alive, intimidation will not solve your problem. This scenario highlights the importance of distributed, fault-tolerant processes and tools that allow you to replicate accounts. Doing so will give your organisation the peace of mind that it can recover systems and accounts in the event of a major catastrophe or should key staff become incapacitated – or simply out of reach.

Do not let VMs prevent partial recovery

The fact that most backup and recovery operations are all-or-nothing propositions did not pose much of a problem a few short years ago. But the wide-scale adoption of virtualisation has thrown a wrinkle into many disaster recovery plans. During the triage stage that often follows a disruption, organisations may need to immediately recover only a piece of the infrastructure – say, one critical virtualised server that handles e-mail messaging. But the nature of VMs makes it impossible to restore one machine without many others. As organisations think about business continuity, they really need to plan for partial recovery of the most critical business services first.

The cloud cannot save you

Disaster recovery is often at the top of the laundry list of benefits touted by public cloud vendors. True, the flexibility and resiliency of the cloud can promote continuity for data contained within that architecture. But that is the big catch. Much of your data is not contained in the cloud and never will move there.

In fact, if your organisation faces any of today’s prevailing regulatory compliance mandates it is likely that your most sensitive data will remain in-house. So, any but the smallest organisation that pins its disaster recovery hopes on the cloud may need to rethink those assumptions.

When laying out their disaster recovery plans, organisations should repeatedly seek out their worst-case scenarios. And they should be testing their recovery efforts. Businesses often struggle with recovering from a disaster because they have never actually practiced the procedures they have planned. Resource limitations and fear of downtime often keep organisations from achieving the ideal full recovery simulations, but at the very least organisations should perform repeat, limited recovery testing.

Doing so can not only streamline your future recovery, but can also test how well your IT vendors stand behind their promises. You could be surprised how some vendors struggle to meet their SLAs, while others bend over backwards – even if it is not spelled out in the contract.


  Share via Twitter   Share via LinkedIn      

Further reading:

  • The benefits of ONVIF membership
    July 2016, Security Services & Risk Management
    ONVIF members offer their opinions on ONVIF’s standards, benefits and future.
  • ONVIF: The evolution of a standard
    July 2016, This Week's Editor's Pick, Security Services & Risk Management
    ONVIF has achieved a lot since its founding in 2008. ONVIF has nearly 500 members and there are more than 5000 ONVIF-conformant products in the market today.
  • More secure governing
    July 2016, Alwinco, Security Services & Risk Management
    Although governmental buildings and offices, particularly those made accessible to the public, have access control, most of these properties do not otherwise have effective overall security.
  • High performance team connectivity
    July 2016, Security Services & Risk Management, IT infrastructure in security
    High-performance PTT across broadband and land mobile radio networks to keep teams more connected than ever.
  • Data security is at the heart of PoPI
    July 2016, This Week's Editor's Pick, Security Services & Risk Management
    As the implementation of the Protection of Personal Information Act (PoPI) gradually comes closer, South African organisations are wondering how best to prepare for it.
  • Loose lips sink ships
    June 2016, Alwinco, This Week's Editor's Pick, Security Services & Risk Management
    Advertise your client on the Internet and open a door to criminals, says independent risk assessor Andre Mundell.
  • Untapped potential in government security
    June 2016, Technews Publishing, Government and Parastatal (Industry), Integrated Solutions, Security Services & Risk Management
    There’s no shortage of potential for advanced security solutions in government, but the awarding and implementation of tenders is an issue.
  • You can have a guard, or you can have a guarding solution
    June 2016, Enforce Security, This Week's Editor's Pick, Integrated Solutions, Security Services & Risk Management
    Manpower is still a crucial aspect of a guarding solution, although technology is changing and improving the process, making both guard and customer safer.
  • Building sustainable smart cities
    June 2016, Government and Parastatal (Industry), Integrated Solutions, Security Services & Risk Management
    Understand, plan and execute. When building sustainable cities, it is vital to first understand the difference between a smart city and a sustainable city.
  • Safeguarding warehouse contents
    June 2016, Active Track, Security Services & Risk Management, Asset Management, EAS, RFID
    Following a robbery at a high-value goods warehouse, Active Track followed the thieves to their hideout.
  • Protecting remote mobile sites
    June 2016, This Week's Editor's Pick, CCTV, Surveillance & Remote Monitoring, Access Control & Identity Management, Asset Management, EAS, RFID, Security Services & Risk Management
    No incidence of theft and vandalism has occurred at a mobile operator’s remote site after ODET PIDS was installed for a period of one year.
  • Guiding businesses through testing times
    June 2016, Cyber Security, Security Services & Risk Management
    New BT security consulting offer to guide businesses through testing times. Cyber Roadmap Consulting identifies weaknesses and recommends ways to strengthen security.

 
 
         
Contact:
Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd
1st Floor, Stabilitas House
265 Kent Ave, Randburg, 2194
South Africa
Publications by Technews
Dataweek Electronics & Communications Technology
Electronic Buyers Guide (EBG)

Hi-Tech Security Solutions
Hi-Tech Security Business Directory (HSBD)

Motion Control in Southern Africa
Motion Control Buyers’ Guide (MCBG)

South African Instrumentation & Control
South African Instrumentation & Control Buyers’ Guide (IBG)
Other
Terms & conditions of use, including privacy policy
PAIA Manual
         
    Mobile | Classic

Copyright © Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved.