The hidden claws of proof of concept

Residential Estate Security Handbook 2019 Editor's Choice, Integrated Solutions

A proof of concept is a wonderful thing. It is the glorious end-product of months, perhaps even years, of honing an idea and its abilities to perfectly suit a market and need. It is the physical manifestation of innovation and it plays an important role in helping the organisation to fine tune issues, assess the true value of a product, determine its value to the market, and so much more. However, it can also be an expensive and time-consuming trap.


Sean Laval.

“A proof of concept (PoC) project is a great way to test new technologies and ideas, but it becomes problematic when it continues for extended periods of time without any quantifiable conclusion as to its success or failure,” says Sean Laval, executive: solutions and innovations, SqwidNet. “It can delay the commercial deployment of a viable solution within the business or for its customers. And this happens far more regularly than organisations realise.”

The pitfalls of PoC often occur when the success criteria of the project aren’t clearly defined from the outset. When the milestones, key performance indicators and benchmarks by which the PoC are measured are not adequately stipulated nor correctly managed. This can be a critical failure point for any project. Just as the employee requires ongoing measurement to ensure growth and performance, a PoC requires precise parameters within which to operate.

“The biggest challenge around the timeous completion of PoC projects is the temptation to keep on adding more to the original scope,” adds Laval. “This often happens as more possibilities become evident as the project evolves and grows. Suddenly, there are so many iterations and opportunities that they are tacked onto the original project without clear outlines or goals. To avoid this, the PoC has to remain a well-structured process.”

A successful PoC project should have a defined operational lifespan. Once this is completed, it needs to be assessed against the final metrics that were determined at the outset to establish whether or not it is worth taking further within the purchase and production lifecycle. This doesn’t mean that new insights and information won’t be uncovered throughout, or that these insights should be ignored, but rather that these fresh ideas and thoughts should be contained within a different phase of the operation.

“In fact, the new information and ideas that are unlocked throughout the course of the PoC, should be considered only after the initial results have indicated that the PoC meets minimum specifications,” says Laval. “The metric that ultimately determines the success of the PoC is whether or not the solution adds value to the business and this can only be understood objectively if the metrics are agreed upon early in the engagement. They should ideally be agreed upon by both the business and the solutions vendor at the beginning of the process to avoid any complications later on.”

To deliver relevant results, the business entering into the PoC needs to understand exactly what information is valuable. This can relate to increased return on investment (ROI), greater operational efficiencies, faster go-to-market capabilities, or improved customer satisfaction. Often, solution providers will promise an array of benefits to the business, across multiple spheres, and equally often, many of these may not be feasible.

The best approach to any PoC is a realistic one that isolates a few key pain points that need to be addressed during the PoC period. This tends to lead to simpler metrics that allow for more valuable evaluation and improved long-term success.

“It is critical to involve all the stakeholders in the business to ensure the problem is correctly defined and understood across multiple levels of the organisation,” says Laval. “By the same token, PoC success is dependent on the reputation and capabilities of the service providers and consultants that the organisation works with.”

Before embarking on a PoC, check the credentials of partner organisations, reference their case studies that describe similar deployments, and ensure you have a clear picture of their capabilities. This will help to identify possible complications early on in the process and mitigate preventable issues.

“A business should consider a PoC project wherever there is a problem that requires an innovative solution, but should always ensure completion is timeous, partners well-vetted, and parameters extensively measured,” concludes Laval.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Coordinated efforts lead to successful crime response
News & Events Surveillance Integrated Solutions
A synchronised operation involving Vumacam’s control room operators, the Johannesburg Metropolitan Police Department (JMPD), and 24/7 Drone Force, resulted in the successful identification and apprehension of a suspect linked to a reported theft case.

Read more...
Access trends for 2026
Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions RR Electronic Security Solutions Enkulu Technologies IDEMIA neaMetrics Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Infrastructure
The access control and identity management industry has been the cornerstone of organisations of all sizes for decades. SMART Security Solutions asked local integrators and distributors about the primary trends in the access and identity market for 2026.

Read more...
Access data for business efficiency
Continuum Identity Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management AI & Data Analytics Facilities & Building Management
In all organisations, access systems are paramount to securing people, data, places, goods, and resources. Today, hybrid systems deliver significant added value to users at a much lower cost.

Read more...
Zero Trust access control
Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions CASA Software NEC XON Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Zero Trust Architecture enforces the rule of ‘never trust, always verify’. It changes an organisation’s security posture by assuming that threats exist both inside and outside the perimeter, and it applies to information and physical security.

Read more...
Gallagher releases Command Centre v9.40
Gallagher Products & Solutions Integrated Solutions
Gallagher Security has released Command Centre v9.40, introducing new capabilities for the Controller 7000 product range and supporting optional licencing expansion to up to 24 doors per controller, more than doubling the previous limit of 10.

Read more...
What is your ‘real’ security posture?
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Many businesses operate under the illusion that their security controls, policies, and incident response plans will hold firm when tested by cybercriminals, but does this mean you are really safe?

Read more...
What is your ‘real’ security posture? (Part 2)
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure
In the second part of this series of articles from BlueVision, we explore the human element: social engineering and insider threats and how red teaming can expose and remedy them.

Read more...
IQ and AI
Leaderware Editor's Choice Surveillance AI & Data Analytics
Following his presentation at the Estate Security Conference in October, Craig Donald delves into the challenge of balancing human operator ‘IQ’ and AI system detection within CCTV control rooms.

Read more...
Onsite AI avoids cloud challenges
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Most AI programs today depend on constant cloud connections, which can be a liability for companies operating in secure or high-risk environments. That reliance exposes sensitive data to external networks, but also creates a single point of failure if connectivity drops.

Read more...
Toxic combinations
Editor's Choice
According to Panaseer’s latest research, 70% of major breaches are caused by toxic combinations: overlapping risks that compound and amplify each other, forming a critical vulnerability to be exploited.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.