The law and electric fencing

Residential Estate Security Handbook 2016 - Vol 2 Editor's Choice, Security Services & Risk Management, Residential Estate (Industry)

On the 25th of March 2011, the government published new laws relating to non-lethal electric fences. These laws came into effect on the 1st October 2012. (Later extended to 1st December 2012).

These updates were promulgated for a number of reasons: firstly to ensure the safety of the country’s citizens, secondly to eliminate Telkom, TV, and wireless interference being experienced as a result of poorly installed systems, and finally to set product and erection standards to protect the consumer from receiving inferior quality and potentially dangerous products.

While it is impossible to discuss all the clauses of the new legislation and associated SANS standards, we will address some of the clauses causing confusion.

For the record, the section of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1993, relating to electric fences is found under Electrical Machinery Regulations 2011, Schedule 12, Electric Fences, or in the Government Gazette, Regulation Gazette No. 9509, Vol. 549, Pretoria 25 March 2011 No. 34154. The Act also refers to South African National Standards, namely SANS 10335-2-76 and SANS 10222-3 (2011 Edition 5). For a full and comprehensive explanation of the Act, addendums and SANS standards, one will have to consult these documents.

Firstly, the updated Act requires that any energiser sold must comply with the specifications laid out in SANS 60335-2-76. A manufacturer must now be able to produce a valid Certificate of Compliance (less than five years old) issued by an internationally registered test laboratory, verifying that the energiser has been tested and approved.

Currently in South Africa, the only laboratory certified to carry out such tests is Test Africa, based in Pretoria. Not satisfied with this, government also requires that the manufacturer must produce a document known as an LOA. An LOA (Letter of Authority) is a document issued by the NRCS (National Regulator for Compulsory Standards) authorising the manufacturer to market his product in South Africa.

The Act further stipulates that any electric security fence erected after the 1st October 2012 must also have a Certificate of Compliance issued by a person registered with the Department of Labour in terms of regulation 14 as an electric fence installer. (Note: Anyone can erect an electric fence as long as it complies with the clauses stipulated within the SANS 10222-3 Document, but only a registered installer can issue a COC.)

Compliance a legal requirement

Next, any property that is sold after the 1st October 2012 and has an electric security fence around it must be sold with a COC. While a COC, once issued, is valid indefinitely, when a property is sold, the COC accompanying the Deed of Sale must be less than two years old for transfer to be registered.

In the case of an estate secured by an electric security fence, it is the responsibility of the body corporate to procure a COC for the perimeter fence around the estate and then should any homeowner sell his/her property within the estate, assuming that they have not erected an electric fence around their own property within the estate, they do not require a COC to have their property transferred.

So where do a body corporate’s responsibilities start and end? Obviously, when the fence is first erected it is the responsibility of the body corporate to procure a COC. There is, however, nothing at present in the new legislation that requires the body corporate to have a COC that is less than two years’ old.

I would, however, strongly recommend, in the interests of the security of the residents’ housed within the estate, that the fence be maintained to COC standards by a registered installer. Further, I also recommend having the fence ‘COC’d’ every two years, thereby covering the body corporate from any unpleasant litigation that could possibly arise as a result of some unforeseen situation.

Protecting the public

The new law also stipulates that in a public area the public must be protected from making inadvertent contact with an electrified fence by having a physical barrier between the fence and the public. This barrier fence should be at least 1.5 m high and one dimension of opening shall not be greater than

150 mm. (For example, the pales of a palisade fence must be no further apart than 150 mm.) Further, this barrier fence must be within a range of 100 mm to 200 mm or greater than 1000 mm from the electric fence. This is to prevent it forming a mantrap.

The question that now arises is: What is a public area and is it necessary to have a barrier fence within the complex? The SANS regulation defines a public area as: a secure area to which any person can gain legal access without permission from the owner or where members of the public are allowed to enter (such as sports grounds and exhibitions.) A secure estate with access control obviously falls outside of this definition so it is up to the body corporate to decide whether they should erect any physical barriers within the estate to prevent young children or the elderly making inadvertent contact with their electric fence.

In conclusion it is strongly recommended that at least one member of a body corporate should be conversant with the new Act and the SANS specifications so that checks can be made to ensure that an installer has and is complying with the stipulated requirements of the law. Remember, ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse.’

For more information contact Stafix, 0861 STAFIX (782 349), www.stafix.co.za



Credit(s)




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Global security in 2026
Editor's Choice News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Industrial (Industry) Mining (Industry)
The World Security Report 2026 states: “In a world of increasing volatility, physical security has evolved. It is no longer just a defensive measure; it is a critical driver of corporate value.”

Read more...
Who is to blame for autonomous mistakes?
Editor's Choice Security Services & Risk Management Industrial (Industry) Mining (Industry)
Most supply agreements for AI-integrated equipment still closely resemble plant hire contracts from ten years ago: bilateral, human-focused, and silent on who bears the risk when a machine makes a decision on its own.

Read more...
Beyond the checkpoint
Veracitech Editor's Choice
For decades, mining corporations have treated employee screening as a necessary friction point, an operational cost to be managed rather than a strategic capability to be optimised. A new generation of full-body X-ray technology, purpose-built for the realities of high-throughput precious-metals environments, is beginning to change that calculus.

Read more...
Persistent surveillance with rapid deployment
Editor's Choice
Sky Robots has introduced an aerial drone system designed to operate as a consistent layer within security environments, addressing long-standing challenges around visibility and response across large or complex sites.

Read more...
The control room problem that nobody wants to talk about
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice
WhatsApp has become the unofficial backbone of security communications across the mining and industrial sectors, but it was never designed to be a security tool.

Read more...
Controlling access for people and vehicles
IDEMIA STid Security Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Asset Management Industrial (Industry) Mining (Industry)
When it comes to access control, the security requirements of mines and the industrial sector are similar, requiring a layered approach that combines physical barriers, digital authentication, and continuous monitoring to protect personnel, assets, and operational continuity.

Read more...
957 women killed in three months
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Despite years of summits, task teams and public commitments, South Africa’s femicide rate remains around five times higher than the global average, and too few are using the legal lifelines available.

Read more...
The security debt hidden in residential estates
Security Services & Risk Management Integrated Solutions Residential Estate (Industry)
Many residential estates undermine their own security not through a lack of technology, but through hidden weaknesses in gate design, fragmented systems, recurring software dependence, weak operational ownership, and insufficient estate management input.

Read more...
Service robot technology for residential complexes
Suprema AI & Data Analytics Infrastructure Residential Estate (Industry)
Suprema has signed a three-party memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Hyundai Motor Group Robotics LAB and Hyundai Engineering & Construction (Hyundai E&C) to collaborate on advancing residential complexes through service robot technology.

Read more...
Africa’s opportunity to shape the future of human-centred AI
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
Across the Global South, countries are not yet locked into decades of legacy AI systems, energy-intensive infrastructure, or governance frameworks designed for a different technological era. That creates something rare in technology development: a cleaner slate.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.