Cyber-attacks target operational technology

1 July 2019 Editor's Choice, Information Security, Industrial (Industry)

Focus on OT security increasing as around 74% come under attack in the past year, finds a new Fortinet report.

Environments running operational technology (OT) are stepping up their focus on cybersecurity amid a growing number of attacks. This emerged in Fortinet’s recent State of Operational Technology and Cybersecurity Report, which found about 74% of OT organisations have experienced a malware intrusion in the past 12 months, causing damages to productivity, revenue, brand trust, intellectual property, and physical safety.

The report found that a lack of cybersecurity contributes to risk. 78% of the organisations polled have only partial centralised visibility on the cybersecurity of their OT environments, 65% lack role-based access control, and more than half do not use multi-factor authentication or internal network segmentation. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of OT leaders say that keeping pace with change is their biggest challenge, and almost half (45%) are limited by a shortage of skilled labour.

However, OT organisations are increasing their focus on cybersecurity, with 70% planning to roll OT cybersecurity under the CISO in the next year, and 62% of cybersecurity budgets being increased.

Doros Hadjizenonos
Doros Hadjizenonos

“OT is vital to public safety and economic well-being, controlling the equipment that runs the world’s manufacturing plants, power grids, water utilities, shipping lines, and more,” notes Doros Hadjizenonos, regional director – SADC at Fortinet.

OT differs from traditional IT systems due to the processes and systems that must be incorporated to effectively manage production and resource development systems, including engines, valves, sensors, and even robotics, that are common to critical infrastructure environments but may be absent from traditional IT stacks, he says.

However, while IT and OT have been managed separately since their inception, there has been a growing movement toward the convergence of these two systems over the past 12 – 18 months. Incorporating IT capabilities such as big data analytics and machine learning into OT systems, along with faster connectivity solutions in order to respond to security and safety events more quickly, has allowed these industries to improve productivity and efficiency, offering a competitive edge to those who combine the systems effectively.

“It’s important for OT teams to consider how this convergence affects the cybersecurity posture of critical infrastructure, especially given the impact that downtime caused by a cyberattack can have on the economy, health, and productivity of the nation. And worse, the potential safety risks to workers and even local communities should a critical system be compromised,” says Hadjizenonos.

Key factors in attacks

The most common types of cyber-attacks affecting operational technology are malware, phishing, spyware, and mobile security breaches. The survey results show that these attacks persist as a result of four key reasons:

1. Lack of visibility: This makes it difficult for teams to detect unusual behaviour, quickly respond to potential threats, and perform threat analysis – all of which are crucial to a successful cybersecurity posture.

2. Lack of personnel: As we have often seen elsewhere, due to the cybersecurity skills gap the low availability of skilled security professionals is a key concern for operations leaders considering implementing new security tools and controls in the network.

3. Rapid pace of change: Operations leaders note that keeping up with the pace of change is a challenge when it comes to security, and yet, at the same time, slowing digital transformation efforts for any reason can compromise their competitive edge.

4. Network complexity: OT network environments are complex, with anywhere from 50 to 500 devices to monitor and secure, many of which come from different vendors. This exacerbates the challenges surrounding visibility and personnel, as each device stores different data and has different security configuration needs and requirements.

Improving security for operational technology

With these attack vectors and security challenges in mind, there are several steps operations leaders can take to improve the security posture at their organisations and minimise the risks associated with downtime in the wake of an attack.

First, 62% of organisations stated intentions to dramatically increase their cybersecurity budgets this year. Additionally, organisations are also adjusting their cybersecurity strategies, with 70% stating their intention to make the CISO responsible for OT cybersecurity in the next year – currently, just 9% of CISOs overseeing OT security.

In addition to these two changes already underway, organisations can implement several security tactics that have demonstrated success in critical infrastructure industries. As part of this study, Fortinet examined the differences in cybersecurity controls in place between those organisations that experienced zero intrusions over the last 12 months, and similarly-sized organisations with six or more intrusions. There were several tactics and tools that stood out among those top-tier organisations that those in the bottom-tier lacked, including:

• Multi-factor authentication.

• Role-based access control.

• Network segmentation.

• Conduct security compliance reviews.

• Management and analysis of security events.

As OT and IT systems continue to converge, implementing these essential tactics can help operations leaders and CISOs gain visibility across their OT environments while reducing complexity in their network to reduce cyber risk.

Final thoughts

Security threats to operational technology networks, especially in critical infrastructures such as transportation, health, and energy, can have major consequences for ensuring the success of these organisations, as well as for the daily lives of the people those industries support. To help minimise this risk, this latest report from Fortinet provides a critical examination of key areas of vulnerability in order to help OT teams identify more effective ways to improve cybersecurity efforts in the industries they support.

Find out more at https://www.fortinet.com/demand/gated/report-state-of-operational-technology.html





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Who are you?
Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Who are you? This question may seem strange, but it can only be answered accurately by implementing an Identity and Access Management (IAM) system, a crucial component of any company’s security strategy.

Read more...
Check Point launches African Perspectives on Cybersecurity report
News & Events Information Security
Check Point Software Technologies released its African Perspectives on Cybersecurity Report 2025, revealing a sharp rise in attacks across the continent and a major shift in attacker tactics driven by artificial intelligence

Read more...
What is your ‘real’ security posture?
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Many businesses operate under the illusion that their security controls, policies, and incident response plans will hold firm when tested by cybercriminals, but does this mean you are really safe?

Read more...
What is your ‘real’ security posture? (Part 2)
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure
In the second part of this series of articles from BlueVision, we explore the human element: social engineering and insider threats and how red teaming can expose and remedy them.

Read more...
IQ and AI
Leaderware Editor's Choice Surveillance AI & Data Analytics
Following his presentation at the Estate Security Conference in October, Craig Donald delves into the challenge of balancing human operator ‘IQ’ and AI system detection within CCTV control rooms.

Read more...
Onsite AI avoids cloud challenges
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Most AI programs today depend on constant cloud connections, which can be a liability for companies operating in secure or high-risk environments. That reliance exposes sensitive data to external networks, but also creates a single point of failure if connectivity drops.

Read more...
Toxic combinations
Editor's Choice
According to Panaseer’s latest research, 70% of major breaches are caused by toxic combinations: overlapping risks that compound and amplify each other, forming a critical vulnerability to be exploited.

Read more...
Kaspersky finds security flaws that threaten vehicle safety.
News & Events Information Security Transport (Industry)
At its Security Analyst Summit 2025, Kaspersky presented the results of a security audit that exposed a significant security flaw enabling unauthorised access to all connected vehicles of one automotive manufacturer.

Read more...
GenAI fraud forcing banks to shift from identity to intent
AI & Data Analytics Information Security Financial (Industry)
The complexity and velocity of modern fraud schemes, from deepfakes to fraud and scams involving social engineering, demand more than just investment in new tools; they need adaptability and expanding the security net.

Read more...
Cyber attack surface expanding
Asset Management Information Security Logistics (Industry)
Despite the increasing number of attacks, analysis of Allianz Commercial cyber claims shows that severity is down by 50% and large-claim frequency by 30% in H1 2025, driven by larger companies’ enhanced detection and response capabilities.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.