Strengthening IoT security

1 April 2018 Editor's Choice, Information Security, Industrial (Industry)

In January 2018, a new international standard on ‘Security capabilities supporting safety of the Internet of Things’ (Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806) officially came into play. Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 was developed by Study Group 20 ‘Internet of things (IoT) and smart cities and communities’ of ITU’s Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T). This new standard classifies security issues for IoT, examines possible threats for security systems, and clears out the safe execution of IoT cyber-physical systems ­supported by security capabilities. Kaspersky Lab, as a member of ITU-T Study Group 20, was one of the contributors to the development of Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806.

Kaspersky Lab researchers have shown that non-computing connected devices’ incidents are among the top-3 – incidents with the most severe financial impact1, for both SMB and enterprise organisations, and are going to increase2. In the wake of the recent TRITON attack, targeting industrial control systems, it became obvious that attacks on cyber-physical systems can affect not only the information aspects, but also functional safety. Therefore, in response to today’s growing prevalence of IoT threats and elaboration on crucial industry standards, Kaspersky Lab ICS CERT experts actively contributed to the development of Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 ‘Security capabilities supporting safety of the Internet of things’3 in order to determine which security capabilities specified in Recommendation ITU-T Y.4401/Y.2068 ‘Functional framework and capabilities of the Internet of things’ support safe execution of IoT.

The experts provided up-to-date specific recommendations for IoT framework security. Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 is mostly applicable to safety-critical Internet of Things (IoT) systems, such as industrial automation, automotive systems, transportation, smart cities, and wearable and standalone medical devices. Additionally, Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 considers how the joint analysis of threats and security capabilities mentioned therein may be used to establish security requirements for the different applications of the Internet of things.

“In the wake of the recent TRITON attack targeting industrial safety systems, it became obvious that attacks on cyber-physical systems can affect not only the information aspects, but also the functional safety. Our aim was not only to plant the flag on the idea of high probability of security breach attacks, but also to determine the methodology for developing specific requirements. We believe that our contribution to ITU-T’s IoT security standard (Recommendation ITU-T Y. 4806) will help organisations develop more efficient cybersecurity strategies to fully face up to modern cyber threats,” added Andrey Doukhvalov, head of Future Techs, Kaspersky Lab.

According to Kaspersky Lab ICS CERT experts, the most common cyber-physical system vulnerabilities include:

• Insufficient protection of embedded web servers (web applications).

• Self-made, poorly implemented cryptography.

• Built-in credentials, which are stored in firmware of programmable logic controller and allow remote hidden access with high privileges.

• Execution of arbitrary code.

• Escalation of privileges.

To counter the above vulnerabilities, and other less frequent IoT security challenges, recommendations developed by Kaspersky Lab ICS CERT experts describe how to proceed from consideration of the types of impact on the cyber-physical system, to the analysis and modelling of threats to functional safety, and then to the development of recommendations on security measures, illustrating the described method with concrete examples.

To avoid attacks such as TRITON and, as per Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 which summarises the data necessary to establish the requirements for industrial control systems to resist security threats that could affect safety, Kaspersky Lab experts strongly recommend the following:

• To implement reliable and resistant to attacks communication infrastructure and monitoring mechanisms, as well as mutual authentication and authorisation for management and control.

• To implement the audit of management and control procedures and attack detection mechanisms.

• To implement the mechanism to monitor the load on equipment and communication channels, including the detection of both unintentional overload and denial of service attacks.

The full method and list of advice for the protection of IoT critical infrastructures can be found in Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 (securitysa.com/*itu1).

To find out more about Kaspersky Lab’s Industrial Cybersecurity expertise, visit https://ics-cert.kaspersky.com

References:

1 https://www.kaspersky.com/about/press-releases/2017_third-party-cybersecurity-failures-cost-businesses-the-most (short URL: securitysa.com/*kas2)

2 https://ics-cert.kaspersky.com/reports/2017/11/30/industrial-enterprise-and-iot-security-threats-forecast-for-2018/ (short URL: securitysa.com/*kas1)

3 https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/rec.aspx?id=13391&lang=en (short URL: securitysa.com/*itu1)





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Banking’s AI reckoning
Commercial (Industry) Surveillance Access Control & Identity Management Fire & Safety Perimeter Security, Alarms & Intruder Detection Information Security Asset Management News & Events Integrated Solutions Infrastructure Security Services & Risk Management Education (Industry) Entertainment and Hospitality (Industry) Financial (Industry) Healthcare (Industry) Industrial (Industry) Mining (Industry) Residential Estate (Industry) Retail (Industry) Transport (Industry) Conferences & Events Products & Solutions Associations Videos Training & Education Smart Home Automation Agriculture (Industry) Logistics (Industry) AI & Data Analytics Facilities & Building Management IoT & Automation Power Management
From agentic commerce disputes to quantum-powered risk modelling, SAS experts offer a ‘banker’s dozen,’ 13 industry-defining predictions that will separate institutions that master intelligent banking from those still struggling with the basics.

Read more...
Axis signs CISA Secure by Design pledge
Axis Communications SA News & Events Surveillance Information Security
Axis Communications has signed the United States Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Secure by Design pledge, signalling the company’s commitment to upholding and transparently communicating the cybersecurity posture of its products.

Read more...
AI cybersecurity predictions for 2026
AI & Data Analytics Information Security
The rapid development of AI is reshaping the cybersecurity landscape in 2026, for both individual users and businesses. Large language models (LLMs) are influencing defensive capabilities while simultaneously expanding opportunities for threat actors.

Read more...
SMARTpod Talks to Check Point Technologies about the African Perspectives on Cybersecurity report
SMART Security Solutions News & Events Information Security Videos
SMART Security Solutions spoke with Check Point's Hendrik de Bruin about the report, the risks African organisations face, and some mitigation measures.

Read more...
Who are you?
Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Who are you? This question may seem strange, but it can only be answered accurately by implementing an Identity and Access Management (IAM) system, a crucial component of any company’s security strategy.

Read more...
Check Point launches African Perspectives on Cybersecurity report
News & Events Information Security
Check Point Software Technologies released its African Perspectives on Cybersecurity Report 2025, revealing a sharp rise in attacks across the continent and a major shift in attacker tactics driven by artificial intelligence

Read more...
What is your ‘real’ security posture?
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Many businesses operate under the illusion that their security controls, policies, and incident response plans will hold firm when tested by cybercriminals, but does this mean you are really safe?

Read more...
What is your ‘real’ security posture? (Part 2)
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure
In the second part of this series of articles from BlueVision, we explore the human element: social engineering and insider threats and how red teaming can expose and remedy them.

Read more...
IQ and AI
Leaderware Editor's Choice Surveillance AI & Data Analytics
Following his presentation at the Estate Security Conference in October, Craig Donald delves into the challenge of balancing human operator ‘IQ’ and AI system detection within CCTV control rooms.

Read more...
Onsite AI avoids cloud challenges
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Most AI programs today depend on constant cloud connections, which can be a liability for companies operating in secure or high-risk environments. That reliance exposes sensitive data to external networks, but also creates a single point of failure if connectivity drops.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.