Strengthening IoT security

1 April 2018 Editor's Choice, Information Security, Industrial (Industry)

In January 2018, a new international standard on ‘Security capabilities supporting safety of the Internet of Things’ (Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806) officially came into play. Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 was developed by Study Group 20 ‘Internet of things (IoT) and smart cities and communities’ of ITU’s Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T). This new standard classifies security issues for IoT, examines possible threats for security systems, and clears out the safe execution of IoT cyber-physical systems ­supported by security capabilities. Kaspersky Lab, as a member of ITU-T Study Group 20, was one of the contributors to the development of Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806.

Kaspersky Lab researchers have shown that non-computing connected devices’ incidents are among the top-3 – incidents with the most severe financial impact1, for both SMB and enterprise organisations, and are going to increase2. In the wake of the recent TRITON attack, targeting industrial control systems, it became obvious that attacks on cyber-physical systems can affect not only the information aspects, but also functional safety. Therefore, in response to today’s growing prevalence of IoT threats and elaboration on crucial industry standards, Kaspersky Lab ICS CERT experts actively contributed to the development of Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 ‘Security capabilities supporting safety of the Internet of things’3 in order to determine which security capabilities specified in Recommendation ITU-T Y.4401/Y.2068 ‘Functional framework and capabilities of the Internet of things’ support safe execution of IoT.

The experts provided up-to-date specific recommendations for IoT framework security. Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 is mostly applicable to safety-critical Internet of Things (IoT) systems, such as industrial automation, automotive systems, transportation, smart cities, and wearable and standalone medical devices. Additionally, Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 considers how the joint analysis of threats and security capabilities mentioned therein may be used to establish security requirements for the different applications of the Internet of things.

“In the wake of the recent TRITON attack targeting industrial safety systems, it became obvious that attacks on cyber-physical systems can affect not only the information aspects, but also the functional safety. Our aim was not only to plant the flag on the idea of high probability of security breach attacks, but also to determine the methodology for developing specific requirements. We believe that our contribution to ITU-T’s IoT security standard (Recommendation ITU-T Y. 4806) will help organisations develop more efficient cybersecurity strategies to fully face up to modern cyber threats,” added Andrey Doukhvalov, head of Future Techs, Kaspersky Lab.

According to Kaspersky Lab ICS CERT experts, the most common cyber-physical system vulnerabilities include:

• Insufficient protection of embedded web servers (web applications).

• Self-made, poorly implemented cryptography.

• Built-in credentials, which are stored in firmware of programmable logic controller and allow remote hidden access with high privileges.

• Execution of arbitrary code.

• Escalation of privileges.

To counter the above vulnerabilities, and other less frequent IoT security challenges, recommendations developed by Kaspersky Lab ICS CERT experts describe how to proceed from consideration of the types of impact on the cyber-physical system, to the analysis and modelling of threats to functional safety, and then to the development of recommendations on security measures, illustrating the described method with concrete examples.

To avoid attacks such as TRITON and, as per Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 which summarises the data necessary to establish the requirements for industrial control systems to resist security threats that could affect safety, Kaspersky Lab experts strongly recommend the following:

• To implement reliable and resistant to attacks communication infrastructure and monitoring mechanisms, as well as mutual authentication and authorisation for management and control.

• To implement the audit of management and control procedures and attack detection mechanisms.

• To implement the mechanism to monitor the load on equipment and communication channels, including the detection of both unintentional overload and denial of service attacks.

The full method and list of advice for the protection of IoT critical infrastructures can be found in Recommendation ITU-T Y.4806 (securitysa.com/*itu1).

To find out more about Kaspersky Lab’s Industrial Cybersecurity expertise, visit https://ics-cert.kaspersky.com

References:

1 https://www.kaspersky.com/about/press-releases/2017_third-party-cybersecurity-failures-cost-businesses-the-most (short URL: securitysa.com/*kas2)

2 https://ics-cert.kaspersky.com/reports/2017/11/30/industrial-enterprise-and-iot-security-threats-forecast-for-2018/ (short URL: securitysa.com/*kas1)

3 https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/rec.aspx?id=13391&lang=en (short URL: securitysa.com/*itu1)





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

71% of organisations suffered an identity breach
News & Events Information Security
The State of Identity Security 2026 report from Sophos finds human error and poor non-human identity management are the root causes of most attacks, as agentic AI accelerates the risk.

Read more...
Global security in 2026
Editor's Choice News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Industrial (Industry) Mining (Industry)
The World Security Report 2026 states: “In a world of increasing volatility, physical security has evolved. It is no longer just a defensive measure; it is a critical driver of corporate value.”

Read more...
Who is to blame for autonomous mistakes?
Editor's Choice Security Services & Risk Management Industrial (Industry) Mining (Industry)
Most supply agreements for AI-integrated equipment still closely resemble plant hire contracts from ten years ago: bilateral, human-focused, and silent on who bears the risk when a machine makes a decision on its own.

Read more...
Industry perspective on industrial cybersecurity
Technews Publishing News & Events Infrastructure Industrial (Industry)
The Industrial Security Harmonization Group has released a joint industry perspective highlighting a critical truth in industrial cybersecurity: secure communication is not determined by protocols alone, but by how they are deployed and managed in real-world environments.

Read more...
Cyber resilience is the real defence
Security Services & Risk Management Information Security Infrastructure
Cyber resilience has evolved into a form of strategic agility, ensuring that when an interruption occurs, the business does not just survive; it snaps back into place before the market even notices a pause.

Read more...
Beyond the checkpoint
Veracitech Editor's Choice
For decades, mining corporations have treated employee screening as a necessary friction point, an operational cost to be managed rather than a strategic capability to be optimised. A new generation of full-body X-ray technology, purpose-built for the realities of high-throughput precious-metals environments, is beginning to change that calculus.

Read more...
Persistent surveillance with rapid deployment
Editor's Choice
Sky Robots has introduced an aerial drone system designed to operate as a consistent layer within security environments, addressing long-standing challenges around visibility and response across large or complex sites.

Read more...
The control room problem that nobody wants to talk about
Technews Publishing Editor's Choice
WhatsApp has become the unofficial backbone of security communications across the mining and industrial sectors, but it was never designed to be a security tool.

Read more...
Controlling access for people and vehicles
IDEMIA STid Security Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Asset Management Industrial (Industry) Mining (Industry)
When it comes to access control, the security requirements of mines and the industrial sector are similar, requiring a layered approach that combines physical barriers, digital authentication, and continuous monitoring to protect personnel, assets, and operational continuity.

Read more...
Employees are SA’s biggest cyber threat
Security Services & Risk Management Information Security
South Africa experienced a 46% increase in insider cyber risk in 2026, surpassing the global average of 44%. What is more, 63% of South African companies surveyed expect insider-driven data losses to increase.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.