Wireless the weakest security link

1 September 2015 Information Security

Information technology decision makers (ITDMs) believe wireless networks to be the most vulnerable element of the IT infrastructure, according to a new survey from Fortinet. Nearly half (49%) of respondents ranked wireless networks as most exposed from a security standpoint, in contrast to just 29% for the core network.

The Fortinet survey also reveals that insufficient wireless security is a concern for almost all (92%) of the CIOs polled; hardly surprising given that more than one-third of the enterprise wireless networks put in place for internal employees, do not have the basic security function of authentication in place.

The findings come from an independent survey of over 1490 IT decision makers at 250+ employee organisations around the world. All respondents were sourced from independent market research company Lightspeed GMI’s online panel.

Other survey highlights include:

• Nearly half of ITDMs (48%) consider loss of sensitive corporate and/or customer data the biggest risk of operating an unsecured wireless environment.

• 72% have adopted a cloud approach to management of their wireless infrastructure and 88% trust the cloud for future wireless deployment.

• 43% of ITDMs polled provide guest access on their corporate wireless networks; 13% of these organisations do so without any controls whatsoever.

Wireless networks at risk

According to the survey, wireless networks are ranked as the most vulnerable IT infrastructure, with the highest proportion of ITDMs (49%) placing it in their top two. Respondents positioned wireless as significantly more vulnerable than core networking infrastructure, with just 29% of ITDMs ranking this highly. Databases (25%), applications (17%) and storage (11%) infrastructures were considered amongst the least susceptible from a security standpoint.

In addition, 37% of global ITDMs polled do not have the most basic wireless security measure of authentication in place. A significant 29% and 39% of enterprises respectively, overlook firewall and anti-virus security functions when it comes to wireless strategies.

Other security measures deemed critical to core infrastructure protection, such as IPS (deployed by 41%), application control (37%) and URL filtering (29%), play a part in even fewer wireless deployments.

When considering the future direction of their wireless security strategies, the majority of respondents said they would maintain focus on the most common security features – firewall and authentication, while demand for more security is emerging with 23% prioritising complementary technologies – IPS, anti-virus, application control and URL filtering – to guard against the full extent of the threat landscape.

Concern high over insufficient wireless security

Of the ITDMs surveyed, 83% are concerned their existing wireless security is not sufficient, with CIOs reporting the highest level of concern at 92%. Despite deploying the highest level of security of all the regions surveyed, ITDMs across APAC are the most concerned about their wireless security with 44% stating they are very concerned, in contrast to 30% in the Americas, and 20% in EMEA.

Globally, ITDMs reported varying confidence levels in wireless security; China tops the board with 71% ‘very concerned’, compared to just 13% in Japan.

The findings suggest that increased security awareness leads to higher levels of concern, with respondents in the top two concerned countries – China and India – deploying more wireless security functions on average, than the two least concerned countries – Italy and Japan.

Risk of data loss tops poll

When asked to cite the risks of operating an unsecured wireless network, 48% of ITDMs considered loss of sensitive corporate and/or customer data as the biggest risk to their organisation. This was highest at 56% in APAC, in contrast to the Americas at 45% and EMEA 42%.

The next highest risk, industrial espionage, was cited by just 22% of ITDMs, followed by non-compliance to industry regulations (13%), with service interruption and damage to corporate reputation ranked equal last (9%).

Cloud management becomes the norm

Wireless infrastructure governed by a premise-based controller is a thing of the past according to the findings, with on-site wireless controllers the least common form of management (28%). This trend for cloud-based management looks set to grow further, with only 12% of enterprise ITDMs refusing to trust the cloud for such critical management in the future.

Of the cloud-ready respondents, 58% would want to use a private cloud infrastructure for wireless management and 42% would outsource to a third-party managed services provider. 14% of those considering outsourcing would only do so provided it is hosted in the same country, leaving 28% happy to embrace wireless management as a public cloud service regardless of geography.

‘Totally open’ guest access

Nearly half (43%) of ITDMs polled provide guest access on their corporate wireless networks, with 13% of these organisations doing so without any controls whatsoever. The most common form of guest security access on corporate wireless networks is a unique and temporary username and password (46%), ahead of a captive portal with credentials (36%).

“The survey findings indicate that despite the growth in mobility strategies, wireless security has simply not been a priority for enterprises to date,” said John Maddison, vice president of marketing products at Fortinet. “As advanced persistent attacks increasingly target multiple entry points, and the cloud becomes more prevalent, it’s not an oversight organisations should risk any longer.

“It’s positive to see IT leaders beginning to recognise the role wireless security plays in protecting their critical business assets, yet there is more to be done. As IT strives to balance the need for strong network security with ubiquitous connectivity, wireless must be considered as part of an holistic security strategy to ensure broad and consistent protection for users and devices over wired and wireless access.”





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Compressing cyberattack timelines and targeting ungoverned AI identities
Information Security News & Events
Sophos AI Security 2026 report finds attackers are moving beyond experimentation and operationalising AI for attacks using identity as the primary initial access vector, rather than inventing new attack types.

Read more...
Zero-touch automation certificate life cycle management loop
Products & Solutions Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
ManageEngine completes the certificate life cycle management loop with CA-agnostic, zero-touch automation. New post-deployment automation in Key Manager Plus removes the last manual step in certificate renewal as lifespans gradually shrink to 47 days

Read more...
Sophos launches AI-native cybersecurity defence system
News & Events Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Built for a threat landscape reshaped by AI, Sophos Fusion unites security operations, endpoint, network security, identity, email, and cloud into one defence system that prevents, detects, investigates, and responds at AI speed.

Read more...
Ungoverned AI agents and deepfakes pose critical threats
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Global study reveals 64% of South African organisations already deploy autonomous AI agents with little to no governance, while 63% of employees admit they are unlikely to be able to spot attacks such as deepfakes

Read more...
How ‘TikTok Brain’ is breaking legacy security training
Training & Education Information Security
Between doomscrolling, rapid-fire Slack notifications, and algorithmic video feeds, the average employee is trapped in an aggressive, highly engineered dopamine loop that automatically shuts down in traditional training situations.

Read more...
Quantum is coming
Infrastructure Information Security
The global cybersecurity landscape is approaching a turning point as quantum computing accelerates faster than most organisations realise; the shift is not a distant, theoretical concern, but a present-day business risk that demands immediate action.

Read more...
Outpacing cyberthreats in the age of AI
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing News & Events Information Security
SMARTpod talks to Fred Streefland, Global Field CISO for EMEA at Check Point Software Technologies, about framing modern cyber defence around adaptability, rapid decision-making, and the OODA loop adapted for cybersecurity.

Read more...
Prompt injection is the new phishing
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
AI security is heading in an uncomfortable direction following Microsoft’s research showing how prompt injection can be chained to remote code execution vulnerabilities in AI agent frameworks, including work involving Semantic Kernel

Read more...
Cybersecurity needs actual intelligence before artificial intelligence
Information Security AI & Data Analytics
Cybersecurity depends on interpretation. A tool can tell you that something unusual has happened, but people need to determine whether it is a genuine risk, the business impact, and how to respond without causing unnecessary disruption.

Read more...
Duxbury Cybersecurity sharpens reseller offering
Duxbury Networking Information Security News & Events
Duxbury Networking has strengthened its Duxbury Cybersecurity business unit by adding WatchGuard and Cynet, giving South African resellers broader, more integrated coverage for the security risks customers are now asking them to address.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.