A real security solution

January 2013 Security Services & Risk Management

I want to tell you a story about why an independent security risk assessment is different from a risk assessment done by a security provider.

Andre Mundell
Andre Mundell

A few years back a new client phoned us with a recurring problem. Criminals had captured one of the guards on the premises and used his radio to establish the whereabouts of the rest of the security team. After capturing the entire security staff, they had been able to rob the company of assets worth thousands.

The client had switched security providers only to have this scenario repeated another four times. Each of these security providers had ostensibly performed a security risk assessment on the property, but they had all recommended solutions which matched the services and products that they offered rather than tailoring solutions to their client’s needs.

We were then asked to do a security risk assessment on the premises in question.

After identifying all the relevant issues the client finally understood how and where the criminals were gaining access to the property and came to the following conclusions:

* The previous security companies had not considered effective lighting options.

* They had not considered thermal products while the neighbourhood and premises itself were very dark, and some of these security providers did not even know the basics of how thermal products work.

Because of the size and layout of the premises, we suggested the following:

* That their security service provider (Company A) be retained and allowed inside the premises.

* Because of the fact that criminals always managed to overpower and take these guards captive, we recommended that another security service provider (Company B), be placed on the outside of the premises in plain clothes.

After a few months, the same criminals attacked the client’s premises again. Company A had not been made aware of Company B, and there was no radio link between the two. This meant that the criminals also had no knowledge of Company B. Company B saw the guards from Company A being overpowered, reacted accordingly by informing the SAPS and their own armed reaction vehicles and in the end, the criminals were apprehended.

The above is a classic example of why security service providers cannot do security risk assessments, and also why they cannot tell you when they find risks that cannot be handled by one of their services or products. Hence the fact that it is imperative that companies employ the services of independent security risk assessors who will suggest real solutions to eliminate the client’s security risks as identified and explained in the final assessment. This in turn will allow the client to ensure that those risks are properly addressed as per the solutions suggested in the security plan.

No security company will advise a client to hire their competition to protect one area while they themselves protect another. Being independent and unaffiliated we were able to see the real risks involved and made solution based suggestions based on the client’s individual and working environment security needs.

It is better that a security risk assessment is done by an independent security risk assessor. Assessors cannot do an objective security risk assessment or ensure relevant and correct solutions if they are affiliated to any security provider or supplier.

Companies requesting security usually assume that their appointed security provider has done a security risk assessment; and most security providers will say that they have done a risk assessment. However, they will have performed a product assessment, not a security risk assessment. Security providers cannot and in most cases will not reveal your true risks to you.

I would like to stress to all corporate MDs, CEOs and small business owners the importance of protecting your company’s assets and employees. Gather all your facts before accepting any proposal for security services or products.

I again want to emphasise the fact that security providers and suppliers are not equipped to do security risk assessments. The fact that they are mandated to perform any and all assessments to reflect their service or product as the best option for you restricts them from being able to do effective and objective security risk assessments.

For more information contact Alwinco, +27 (0)71 319 4735, aviljoen@alwinco.co.za, www.alwinco.co.za





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

The security debt hidden in residential estates
Security Services & Risk Management Integrated Solutions Residential Estate (Industry)
Many residential estates undermine their own security not through a lack of technology, but through hidden weaknesses in gate design, fragmented systems, recurring software dependence, weak operational ownership, and insufficient estate management input.

Read more...
Verification is reshaping South Africa’s labour market
Security Services & Risk Management Asset Management Commercial (Industry)
Hiring faster, trusting less: in a labour market defined by both constraint and potential, the ability to hire with confidence may well become one of the most important competitive advantages.

Read more...
Africa’s opportunity to shape the future of human-centred AI
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
Across the Global South, countries are not yet locked into decades of legacy AI systems, energy-intensive infrastructure, or governance frameworks designed for a different technological era. That creates something rare in technology development: a cleaner slate.

Read more...
AURA appoints Taryn Winer as global head of people
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Following its €13,5 million Series B funding round last year and accelerating international expansion, particularly across the United States, AURA has appointed Taryn Winer as global head of people.

Read more...
95% do not have full trust in cybersecurity vendors
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Trust in cybersecurity vendors is fragile, difficult to measure, and increasingly shaping risk posture at both operational and board levels. Lack of verifiable transparency undermines cybersecurity decision-making, according to Sophos-backed research.

Read more...
Enhancing control room operations
iFacts Security Services & Risk Management Surveillance
As South Africa faces complex and more advanced security challenges, the demand for advanced surveillance solutions, including CCTV and security control rooms, continues to surge, but what about the people in front of the screens?

Read more...
Understanding the Shared Responsibility Model
Infrastructure Security Services & Risk Management
While the cloud can certainly be a growth enabler in many ways, it can also introduce new security risks. Companies want to have a clear understanding of where their security duties end and where their cloud service provider’s begin.

Read more...
“This Is Theft!” SASA slams Mafoko Security
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Associations
The Security Association of South Africa (SASA) has issued a stark warning that the long-running Mafoko Security Patrols scandal is no longer an isolated case of employer misconduct, but evidence of a systemic failure in South Africa’s regulatory and governance structures.

Read more...
Making a mesh for security
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Credential-based attacks have reached epidemic levels. For African CISOs in particular, the message is clear: identity is now the perimeter, and defences must reflect that reality with coherence and context.

Read more...
Privacy by design or by accident
Security Services & Risk Management Infrastructure
Africa’s data future depends on getting it right at the start. If privacy controls do not withstand real-world conditions, such as unstable power, fragile last-mile connectivity, shared devices, and decentralised branch environments, then privacy exists only on paper.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.