Alarms that add value

July 2012 Surveillance

Some claim the first burglar alarm dates back to 1852. Others argue that the first intrusion alarm dates back to 390 BC when Rome was saved by an organic alarm system of cackling geese as invaders attempted to climb the wall. In any event, the security industry exists because consumers are convinced that an alarm system that detects intruders and brings a timely response is a worthwhile investment.

The time of cackling geese is past and hopefully the alarm industry has evolved with advances of technology but the industry still struggles with three main challenges:

1. False alarms: Over 98% of alarms in most monitoring stations are false alarms.

2. Installation costs: The price of installation is often close to the total cost of the alarm system.

3. Declining RMR (recurring monthly revenue) for monitoring station and maintenance services.

New cordless/wireless video alarm systems overcome these obstacles and bring new value to the security industry and its customers. However, some in the industry are still reluctant to embrace new video technologies and many monitoring stations are still addressing the consequences of false alarms rather than addressing the cause of them.

Caught in the act

The big push towards wireless video verification is now coming from outside the alarm industry and the success of video alarms is due to two factors, more arrests and fewer false alarms. Law enforcement, armed response companies and consumers value arrests and capturing the intruder in the act. Video alarms make this happen because there is immediate confirmation of a crime-in-progress instead of a standard alarm signal.

Law enforcement forces and armed response companies give higher priority to alarms where they believe they will make an arrest. Some governments are going even further and are adopting laws forcing monitoring stations to visually verify their alarm before they can expect any sort of police response at all. What is certain is that law enforcement supports video alarms, and consumers using them will have a greater degree of protection.

In France, the police are likely to respond to a call from a monitoring station, but if it is a false alarm they fine the monitoring station €450. This fine is sent directly to the monitoring station that can pass it to the end-user. Such a heavy fine can kill any business that cannot verify an alarm properly. Response and fines are now key selling points in Europe and the industry has been very aggressive in proposing video alarms to their prospective customers, both residential and commercial.

Blind alarms or with video

Since April 2010, the New South Wales Police in Australia have enforced a law that was passed in December 2008. Some companies had been using the local police and saving their own security personnel, to the detriment of Sydney’s taxpayers. Now a fine of AU$200 has been introduced but the goal is the same; the police want to catch bad guys, but not work as a runner for false alarms. In 2009, statistics from the NSW police showed that only 6% of all alarm activations they attended were genuine alarms.

Up to now there has been a lot of frustration between law enforcement and monitoring stations. Proven results and increasing public awareness are making video alarm systems a new paradigm for both residential and commercial security.

Efficient resources

Now it is not just all about the police responding to false alarms. Let us have a look at our local market where the police seldom respond to alarms and where most of the response is done by a few large guarding companies as a part of an alarm package. The main concern is not with the number of guards, but making armed response as efficient as possible.

With every premises being equipped with one alarm system you can expect a lot of false activation. Video verification is the best way to prioritise armed response, especially in high crime areas. Prompt response by armed response teams saves lives or critical infrastructure instead of wasting time with nuisance alarms. Once your alarm has been visually verified, it becomes a ‘crime in progress’ and not just another ‘blind alarm’ activation.

More security companies are following this global trend towards video intrusion alarms and the reasons are quite simple – more arrests, more efficiency and cost savings. In time of recession, with increasing crime and budget reductions, police forces are being stretched beyond their limits. Charging a monitoring station for a false alarm is a quick solution but does not maximise public safety. Video alarm systems that confirm a crime-in-progress are the obvious answer for both the government and the consumer to maximise public safety.

For more information contact Wynand Beneke, Security Viewer, +27 (0)72 456 1934, [email protected], www.videofied.co.za





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Pentagon appointed as Milestone distributor
Elvey Security Technologies News & Events Surveillance
Milestone Systems appointed Pentagon Distribution (an Elvey Group company within the Hudaco Group of Companies) as a distributor. XProtect’s open architecture means no lock-in and the ability to customise the connected video solution that will accomplish the job.

Read more...
AI camera for all-around AI solutions
Surveillance Products & Solutions
VIVOTEK has expanded its AI security business with the AI entry-tier 9383-Series network camera, a cost-effective solution that allows users to easily recognise attributes of people and cars, thereby enhancing operation and management efficiencies.

Read more...
Video Analytics Selection Guide 2024
Surveillance
The Video Analytics Selection Guide 2024 highlights a number of video analytics/AI solutions companies offer to enhance and optimise video surveillance operations.

Read more...
Optimising your camera-to-operator ratio
Surveillance
Learning from critical data points in your security systems is the key to quality monitoring, effectively deploying resources, and scaling control room profitability. The golden equation is your true Camera-to-Operator ratio.

Read more...
Storage Selection Guide 2024
Storage Selection Guide Surveillance
The Storage Selection Guide 2024 includes a range of video storage and management options for small, medium and large surveillance operations.

Read more...
Directory of suppliers
Surveillance
The Directory of Suppliers and Solution Providers provides a selection of companies involved in various aspects of surveillance projects, from consulting to implementation and ongoing maintenance, as well as equipment suppliers.

Read more...
Perspectives on personal care monitoring and smart surveillance
Leaderware Editor's Choice Surveillance Smart Home Automation IoT & Automation
Dr Craig Donald believes smart surveillance offers a range of options for monitoring loved ones, but making the right choice is not always as simple as selecting the latest technology.

Read more...
The TCO of cloud surveillance
DeepAlert Verifier Technews Publishing Surveillance Infrastructure
SMART Security Solutions asked two successful, home-grown cloud surveillance operators for their take on the benefits of cloud surveillance to the local market. Does cloud do everything, or are there areas where onsite solutions are preferable?

Read more...
Cloud or onsite, a comparison
Astrosec Surveillance
In the realm of electronic security, the choice between cloud-based and onsite software solutions for offsite CCTV monitoring can significantly impact operational efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and overall effectiveness.

Read more...
On-camera AI and storage create added benefits
Elvey Security Technologies AI & Data Analytics Surveillance IoT & Automation
The days of standalone security systems are long past, and the drive is now to educate system integrators, installers, and end users on the return on investment that can be derived from intelligent, integrated BMS, IoT and security systems.

Read more...