Cyber recovery requires a different approach to disaster recovery

Issue 2 2025 Information Security

The distinction between disaster recovery (DR) and cyber recovery is more crucial than ever. While both strategies aim to safeguard organisations from disruptions, they address fundamentally different threats and require tailored approaches. What I found particularly interesting were recent insights from a survey conducted by Commvault in partnership with ESG1 that shed light on the complexities surrounding cyber recovery, revealing a pressing need for organisations to rethink their strategies.


Modeen Malick.

Understanding the differences

At its core, DR is all about getting operations back on track after unexpected disruptions like natural disasters, hardware failures, or power outages. Think of it as the safety net that catches your business when something outside your control goes wrong. It is about restoring systems, data, and processes so that you can resume business as usual as quickly as possible. Cyber recovery, however, is a whole different ballgame. It is not about accidental disruptions, but intentional, malicious attacks.

Cyber recovery focuses on dealing with the aftermath of cyberattacks like ransomware, data breaches, or other forms of hacking. These are not random events; they are calculated moves by bad actors aiming to disrupt your business, steal sensitive data, or hold your systems hostage. This fundamental difference in intent, accidental versus deliberate, means that organisations cannot simply lump cyber recovery into their existing DR plans.

The methodologies for each need to be distinct and purpose-built. While DR is often about speed and getting back online quickly, cyber recovery requires a more cautious approach. It involves forensic analysis to understand the scope of the attack, ensuring systems are clean before restoring them and implementing measures to prevent reinfection.

The survey unearthed several alarming trends among IT and security leaders:

1. Low confidence levels: Only 26% of respondents feel confident in their ability to protect mission-critical applications and data, with just 20% feeling adequately protected when it comes to operational data.

2. Complexity of cyber recovery: A staggering 70% reported that cyber recovery is either more complex or time-consuming than traditional disaster recovery, primarily due to the additional steps required to manage cyber incidents effectively.

3. Challenges in cyber recovery: An overwhelming 91% highlighted the necessity for extensive forensic analysis to fully understand incidents before recovery can begin. Additionally, 85% acknowledged the risks involved in recovering systems without first ensuring a secure environment.

4. Need for specialised skills: Nearly 59% of respondents noted difficulties in hiring qualified personnel for cyber recovery compared to DR, indicating a significant skills gap in this area.

5. Targeted attacks on backups: The survey found that 92% of organisations have experienced attacks aimed at their backup systems, with 71% reporting these attacks as a significant portion of their overall incidents. However, 96% have implemented additional protective measures for their backup data.

6. Integration with DR: Despite the differences between the two approaches, over 52% of organisations are integrating cyber recovery planning into their broader DR strategies, reflecting a trend toward alignment in processes and protocols.

These findings underscore the critical need for organisations to enhance their cyber recovery strategies, while maintaining robust disaster recovery protocols. Cyber recovery should be viewed as a distinct approach from traditional DR, requiring tailored investments in technology and training.

By integrating cyber recovery into broader disaster recovery plans and proactively addressing these challenges, organisations can enhance their resilience against future threats. Ultimately, being prepared is essential in today’s digital landscape, allowing businesses not only to recover, but also emerge stronger from incidents.

[1] https://tinyurl.com/f5u8x3h3




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Managed security solutions for organisations of all sizes
Information Security News & Events
Cyber attackers have become significantly more sophisticated and determined, targeting businesses of all sizes. PwC’s Global Digital Trust Insights Survey 2025 Africa and South Africa highlights the urgent need for organisations to implement robust cyber risk mitigation strategies.

Read more...
Data resilience at VeeamON
Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions Infrastructure Information Security
SMART Security Solutions attended the VeeamON Tour in Johannesburg in August to learn more about data resilience and Veeam’s initiatives to enhance data protection, both on-site and in the cloud.

Read more...
Troye exposes the Entra ID backup blind spot
Information Security Infrastructure
If you trust Microsoft to protect your identity, think again. Many organisations naively believe that Microsoft’s shared responsibility model covers Microsoft Entra?ID – formerly Azure AD – but it does not.

Read more...
Secure data protection without hardware lock-in
Infrastructure Information Security News & Events
New Veeam Software Appliance empowers IT teams to achieve instant protection with Veeam’s fully preconfigured, software-only appliance, delivering enterprise-ready simplified deployment and operational efficiency, robust cyber resilience.

Read more...
Check Point launches open, vendor-neutral MDR services
Information Security News & Events Products & Solutions
New Check Point MDR 360° and MXDR 360° offerings deliver 24/7 managed continuous threat monitoring protection across endpoints, cloud and network environments with built-in identity threat detection and 160+ integrations across hybrid, multi-vendor environments.

Read more...
Credential theft surges in South Africa
NEC XON Information Security
NEC XON issues a critical cybersecurity warning about the dual threat of massive credential theft and AI-powered cyberattacks sweeping across the region, with an increasing number of incidents and evolving threat tactics.

Read more...
Want effective Attack Surface Management? Think like an attacker.
Information Security
Effective ASM requires companies to think like attackers, anticipate risks, and act decisively to reduce exposure by knowing their environment, deploying a structured approach, leveraging capable tools, and addressing both internal and external risks.

Read more...
The growing role of hybrid backup
Infrastructure Information Security
As Africa’s digital economy rapidly grows, businesses across the continent are facing the challenge of securing data in an environment characterised by evolving cyberthreats, unreliable connectivity and diverse regulatory frameworks.

Read more...
POPIA non-compliance puts municipalities at risk
Information Security Government and Parastatal (Industry)
Digital responsibility must go beyond POPIA compliance to recognising that privacy and service delivery are fundamentally linked. Despite this, only 51 out of 257 municipalities submitted their mandatory data protection and access to information reports in 2024.

Read more...
Choicejacking bypasses smartphone charging security
News & Events Information Security
Choicejacking is a new cyberthreat that bypasses smartphone charging security defences to confirm, without the victim’s input or consent, that the victim wishes to connect in data-transfer mode.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.