The future of AI: Why trust and governance matter

Issue 2 2025 AI & Data Analytics, Security Services & Risk Management

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become embedded in the systems that power organisations, industries, and people’s daily lives. Generative AI (GenAI), in particular, is reshaping how organisations operate. In doing so, the technology is driving efficiencies and unlocking new opportunities.


Josefin Rosén.

This potential comes with significant risk. Without comprehensive AI governance in place, organisations may struggle with compliance, ethical dilemmas, and trust issues that could undermine their AI investments.

Today, organisations are racing to integrate AI into all aspects of their operations. However, a fundamental truth remains—AI will only be as valuable as people's trust in it. Governance has become the bedrock upon which responsible AI must be built.

SAS research shows that 95% of businesses lack a comprehensive AI governance framework for GenAI, exposing them to compliance risks and ethical concerns. AI systems can reinforce bias, compromise data security, and generate unreliable outcomes without clear policies and oversight. Alarmingly, only 5% of companies have a reliable system in place to measure bias and privacy risk in large language models.

Regulatory considerations

Regulatory developments are particularly challenging as governments worldwide continue to assess whether and how to regulate AI. The European Union’s AI Act is leading the way, while countries across Africa and the rest of the world are considering their own regulatory frameworks. Organisations that fail to anticipate these changes risk not only legal penalties in some countries, but also reputational damage and loss of public trust.

Governance provides the framework for mitigating these risks, ensuring AI systems align with ethical standards, business objectives, and legal requirements. To be effective, AI governance must incorporate oversight and compliance mechanisms that integrate legal, ethical, and operational safeguards. Transparency and accountability must be prioritised to ensure AI systems explain their decisions clearly, particularly in high-stakes sectors like finance, healthcare, and public services.

Data integrity and security must be maintained by implementing mechanisms that protect sensitive information, detect biases, and ensure AI models use high-quality, unbiased information. AI governance is not a one-time task. Instead, it requires real-time monitoring and continuous adaptation to keep pace with evolving regulations and industry best practices.

Eroding trust

In the absence of strong governance, organisations face several challenges that can erode trust in AI. Weak regulatory compliance exposes organisations to increasing legal scrutiny as governments worldwide tighten AI-related legislation.

Without proper oversight, AI models trained on biased data risk amplifying societal inequalities, damaging reputations, and alienating customers. Security vulnerabilities further compound these risks, making AI systems prime targets for cyberattacks that can lead to data breaches, intellectual property theft, and misinformation. Perhaps most critically, organisations without AI governance frameworks struggle to gain public and employee trust, limiting the widespread adoption of AI-driven solutions.

Organisations must adopt a governance-first mindset to ensure AI remains a force for good. AI must be developed and deployed in ethical, transparent, and human-centric ways. At SAS, we advocate for responsible innovation, ensuring AI systems prioritise fairness, security, inclusivity, and robustness at every stage of their lifecycle. Organisations need to move beyond passive compliance and take a proactive approach to AI governance.

Changing AI focus

This requires investments in training, the development of internal AI policies, and implementing technology that enforces governance at scale. Furthermore, organisations must cultivate a culture of AI literacy. Research shows that many senior decision-makers still do not fully understand AI’s impact, making it critical for organisations to equip their executives with the knowledge and tools needed to implement AI responsibly.

Ultimately, AI governance is not just about mitigating risks. Rather, it must be considered a strategic advantage. The companies that build AI systems on a foundation of trust will be the ones that thrive in an AI-driven world. Early adopters of trustworthy AI will not only stay ahead of regulatory shifts, but also strengthen customer relationships and unlock AI’s full potential in a responsible and sustainable manner. AI’s evolution is inevitable, but how organisations engage with it will determine whether they succeed or fall behind.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

What is your ‘real’ security posture?
BlueVision Editor's Choice Information Security Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Many businesses operate under the illusion that their security controls, policies, and incident response plans will hold firm when tested by cybercriminals, but does this mean you are really safe?

Read more...
IQ and AI
Leaderware Editor's Choice Surveillance AI & Data Analytics
Following his presentation at the Estate Security Conference in October, Craig Donald delves into the challenge of balancing human operator ‘IQ’ and AI system detection within CCTV control rooms.

Read more...
New agent gateway to mitigate shadow MCP risk
AI & Data Analytics
Agent Gateway, a new capability in the Tray AI Orchestration platform, gives IT power to develop approved MCP tools with policies, permissions, versioning and compliance, then publish them via MCP for secure agent use.

Read more...
AI and automation are rewriting the cloud security playbook
Technews Publishing AI & Data Analytics
Old-school security relied on rules-based systems that flagged only what was already known. AI flips the script: it analyses massive volumes of data in real-time, spotting anomalies that humans or static rules would miss.

Read more...
Onsite AI avoids cloud challenges
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Infrastructure AI & Data Analytics
Most AI programs today depend on constant cloud connections, which can be a liability for companies operating in secure or high-risk environments. That reliance exposes sensitive data to external networks, but also creates a single point of failure if connectivity drops.

Read more...
neaMetrics 2025: Year in review
AI & Data Analytics
With a stronger team, a broader portfolio, and a clear vision for what’s next, neaMetrics is well positioned to continue delivering smarter, more connected security solutions in 2026 and beyond.

Read more...
Syndicates exploit insider vulnerabilities in SA
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Today’s cyber criminals do not just exploit vulnerabilities in your systems; they exploit your people, turning trusted team members into unwitting accomplices or deliberate collaborators in their schemes.

Read more...
GenAI fraud forcing banks to shift from identity to intent
AI & Data Analytics Information Security Financial (Industry)
The complexity and velocity of modern fraud schemes, from deepfakes to fraud and scams involving social engineering, demand more than just investment in new tools; they need adaptability and expanding the security net.

Read more...
Who has access to your face?
Access Control & Identity Management AI & Data Analytics
While you may be adjusting your privacy settings on social media or thinking twice about who is recording you at public events, the reality is that your facial features may be used in other contexts.

Read more...
The impact of AI on security
Technews Publishing Information Security AI & Data Analytics
Today’s threat actors have moved away from signature-based attacks that legacy antivirus software can detect, to ‘living-off-the-land’ using legitimate system tools to move laterally through networks. This is where AI has a critical role to play.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.