Get proactive with cybersecurity

August 2024 Information Security


Christo Coetzer

The ability to respond effectively to a cybersecurity breach is critical, but the missing piece of the puzzle is a thorough, proactive evaluation to ascertain weaknesses and identify any hidden threats. After all, no matter how effectively an organisation responds to a cyber breach, there’s no escaping from the basic truth that the defences were breached and some loss occurred.

Cybersecurity 101 tells one that it is better not to be breached at all. That is where a compromise assessment comes in.

‘Compromise assessment’ is a relatively new term, but it is easily explained. It is essentially a proactive, in-depth evaluation of an organisation’s IT infrastructure. A compromise assessment aims to uncover hidden (or suspected) malicious activities and pinpoint threats and vulnerabilities. One key way it does this is by looking for signs of a past or ongoing security breach.

Traditional security measures often fail to identify these indicators of compromise. It is important to do so for several reasons, not the least of which is that they would indicate where a system is vulnerable, so that this vulnerability can be eliminated.

Equally important; a large proportion of cybercrimes are not even detected. Hackers take great care to disguise the fact that they have penetrated an organisation’s defences. This allows them to explore the system thoroughly in order to identify where the most valuable data is located, and to compromise measures put in place to secure that data in an emergency, such as a ransomware attack.

It is particularly worth noting that hackers are adept at exploiting the operating system’s own tools to achieve their nefarious goals — this means that conventional antivirus programs would not register such activities as vulnerabilities. However, penetration testing undertaken as part of the compromise assessment can be used to identify such activities.

Most attacks unfold in a series of steps over months. IBM’s Cost of Data Breach Report revealed that the average time to detect and contain a cyberattack is around nine months. Just like a cat burglar, a skilled hacker gains access and then surreptitiously moves laterally through the system.

In addition, hackers can use this window of opportunity to prepare for multiple attacks in the future; 80% of ransomware victims are likely to be the targets of repeat attacks by the same cybercriminals.

It’s clear. You need to know whether your system was breached in the past, and how that breach occurred.

Do you need a compromise assessment?

Organisations should request a compromise assessment if they suspect a breach may have occurred, but do not have clear evidence. They should also have one performed to ensure that there are currently no hidden threats or undetected breaches.

In short, a compromise assessment is a valuable way of assessing the effectiveness of the organisation’s current security measures and can be used to improve its overall security posture.

When companies are merging or being acquired, as part of the due-diligence process the target company should be put through a compromise assessment to ensure its systems are uncompromised before the two IT estates are brought together. The Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) recommends compromise assessments as best practice for all organisations.

What does a compromise assessment look like?

Several elements make up a compromise assessment:

Data collection and analysis. The team collects data from multiple sources, such as logs, network traffic reports and endpoints. This data is then analysed using advanced tools and techniques to detect signs of malicious activity or anomalies that need further investigation.

Threat hunting entails actively searching for hidden threats across the entire network and IT estate. It uses information about new threats and what is known about cybercriminals' methods to expose potential and ongoing suspicious activity. Threat hunting is an ongoing process, whereas overall compromise assessment is periodic.

Reporting. The final stage of the process is to compile a detailed report of the findings, including identified threats, vulnerabilities and recommendations for remediation.

Finally, it is worth noting that a compromise assessment cannot be trusted to software (no matter how intelligent) alone. Artificial intelligence and machine learning undoubtedly have a key role to play in processing the huge amounts of data that are available about the system itself and the ever-changing threat landscape, but this analysis must be complemented by the human intelligence of an experienced security professional. Only humans can leverage experience and knowledge creatively and make the kind of lateral, intuitive connections that uncover even the best-camouflaged vulnerabilities.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

From friction to trust
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management Financial (Industry)
Historically, fraud prevention has been viewed as a trade-off between robust security and a seamless customer journey, with security often prevailing. However, this can impair business functionality or complicate the customer journey with multiple logins and authentication steps.

Read more...
Phishing and social engineering are the most significant risks
News & Events Information Security
ESET Research found that phishing accounted for 45,7% of all detected cyberthreats in South Africa, with higher-quality deepfakes, signs of AI-generated phishing websites, and short-lived advertising campaigns designed to evade detection.

Read more...
Zero Trust access control
Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions CASA Software NEC XON Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Zero Trust Architecture enforces the rule of ‘never trust, always verify’. It changes an organisation’s security posture by assuming that threats exist both inside and outside the perimeter, and it applies to information and physical security.

Read more...
OT calculator to align cyber investments with business goals
Industrial (Industry) Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
The OT Calculator has been developed specifically for industrial organisations to assess the potential costs of insufficient operational technology (OT) security. By offering detailed financial forecasts, the calculator empowers senior management to make well-informed decisions.

Read more...
Protecting high-value data from AI
CASA Software Infrastructure Information Security Products & Solutions
As artificial intelligence accelerates the speed and sophistication of cyberattacks, protecting high-value data, such as financial records, legal files, patient data, intellectual property, and compliance records, has never been more urgent.

Read more...
Integrated security key to protecting cloud applications
Infrastructure Information Security
Cloud-native applications have transformed the way businesses operate, enabling faster innovation, greater agility, and enhanced scalability. Yet this evolution brings an equally complex security landscape.

Read more...
Factories, grids, and finance: Critical infrastructure cyber lessons of 2025
Asset Management Information Security Industrial (Industry)
Africa has seen an accelerated, large-scale digitisation of our overall industrial base, and this rapid convergence of IT and OT is happening on a foundation that, in essence, was not designed to be cybersecure.

Read more...
Axis signs CISA Secure by Design pledge
Axis Communications SA News & Events Surveillance Information Security
Axis Communications has signed the United States Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Secure by Design pledge, signalling the company’s commitment to upholding and transparently communicating the cybersecurity posture of its products.

Read more...
Eight African cybersecurity trends for 2026
Information Security
Check Point Software Technologies has released eight critical trends shaping Africa’s digital turning point in 2026, noting that their implementation will require the government, the private sector, and key civic institutions to cooperate.

Read more...
The year of the agent
Information Security AI & Data Analytics
The dominant attack patterns in Q4 2025 included system-prompt extraction attempts, subtle content-safety bypasses, and exploratory probing. Indirect attacks required fewer attempts than direct injections, making untrusted external sources a primary risk vector heading into 2026.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.