Key considerations for a secure and effective MSSP partnership

January 2024 Information Security


Martin Luphai.

he global managed security services provider (MSSP) market was valued at more than $31 billion in 2023 and is anticipated to reach an impressive $64,73 million by 2026. However, despite its solid performance and proven capabilities, the MSSP model can fail. It can become the victim of its own hype, but it has the potential to revolutionise how an organisation approaches, manages and spends on security. The solution is to ensure that an MSSP is the best fit for the company, not just a solution slotted into a problem.

The answer is to ensure that the scope of service fits the MSSP bill. If an organisation already has an existing IT workforce and resources within the company, an MSSP approach may not be the ideal fit, unless the goal is to bolster existing security services and visibility. However, if an organisation does not have a cybersecurity programme or enough IT staff to ensure robust security, then an MSSP is the right step forward.

Deciding the fit lies in the hands of the organisation. If you are confident your staff can handle the work, then an MSSP can guide the direction of your investments and security management, helping you refine your approaches. If not, an MSSP can guide you in the right direction and take on the overall refinement and configuration of the business security ecosystem to ensure it is aligned with best practices and the highest possible standards.

Of course, determining whether or not an MSSP is the right route also comes down to capabilities. Will managing the volume of products be possible for the existing IT workforce? Are they on top of their attack surface area? What are the current security outcomes? If these remain uncertain or the business is falling behind, then finding an MSSP will fit the business and its needs.

That said, the real journey begins once the business has engaged an MSSP. The scope of responsibilities is twofold – how the organisation approaches and manages security from within, and the deliverables promised by the MSSP itself. If there is not a trusted partnership, there is a very real risk of failure. The reality is that security is a shared responsibility. The organisation has to manage its data, the platform, the applications, identities and access management, while the MSSP is responsible for encryption, network and traffic protection, operating systems, networking and firewalls. These responsibilities can shift from one side to the other, depending on the organisation's resources. For example, identity and access management can move from a business responsibility to that of the MSSP.

Taking this relationship further, it is also important to measure the effectiveness of your MSSP consistently. You can use benchmarking tools to assess your MSSP's performance, including competencies, credentials, service offerings, and demonstrable inheritable controls. The latter are key as they demonstrate how competent or safe you are when engaging with your MSSP, and the level of control your provider will have over your production environment. You need to avoid being locked in with a proprietary MSSP and ensure that they have the relevant experience for your particular niche, sector and business. For example, if you are looking at endpoint protection, then you want an MSSP that has many years of experience in this space and the relevance of the experience.

Finally, it is important to ensure that your MSSP prioritises compliance. Where are they storing the data? What are the controls when accessing the data? It is absolutely essential your MSSP aligns with regulations such as GDPR and PoPIA, so you are not held liable for compliance complexities. In the partnership between yourself and your MSSP, you need to both traverse the regulatory landscape with complete visibility and a shared focus on remaining compliant across all touchpoints.

These are just some of the key steps to ensuring that your move towards an MSSP is one guided by shared goals, visibility, proven expertise, relevant capabilities and a realistic view of service delivery. They also ensure that if you opt into an MSSP relationship, it delivers success, not disappointment.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Making a mesh for security
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Credential-based attacks have reached epidemic levels. For African CISOs in particular, the message is clear: identity is now the perimeter, and defences must reflect that reality with coherence and context.

Read more...
What’s in store for PAM and IAM?
Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Leostream predicts changes in Identity and Access Management (IAM) and Privileged Access Management (PAM) in the coming year, driven by evolving cybersecurity realities, hybridisation, AI, and more.

Read more...
The challenges of cybersecurity in access control
Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
SMART Security Solutions summarises the key points dealing with modern cyber risks facing access control systems, from Mercury Security’s white paper “Meeting the Challenges of Cybersecurity in Access Control: A Future-Ready Approach.”

Read more...
Securing your access hardware and software
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing RBH Access Technologies Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Securing access control technology is critical for physical and digital security. Every interaction between readers, controllers, and host systems creates a potential attack point for those with nefarious intent.

Read more...
From friction to trust
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management Financial (Industry)
Historically, fraud prevention has been viewed as a trade-off between robust security and a seamless customer journey, with security often prevailing. However, this can impair business functionality or complicate the customer journey with multiple logins and authentication steps.

Read more...
Phishing and social engineering are the most significant risks
News & Events Information Security
ESET Research found that phishing accounted for 45,7% of all detected cyberthreats in South Africa, with higher-quality deepfakes, signs of AI-generated phishing websites, and short-lived advertising campaigns designed to evade detection.

Read more...
Zero Trust access control
Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions CASA Software NEC XON Editor's Choice Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Zero Trust Architecture enforces the rule of ‘never trust, always verify’. It changes an organisation’s security posture by assuming that threats exist both inside and outside the perimeter, and it applies to information and physical security.

Read more...
OT calculator to align cyber investments with business goals
Industrial (Industry) Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
The OT Calculator has been developed specifically for industrial organisations to assess the potential costs of insufficient operational technology (OT) security. By offering detailed financial forecasts, the calculator empowers senior management to make well-informed decisions.

Read more...
Protecting high-value data from AI
CASA Software Infrastructure Information Security Products & Solutions
As artificial intelligence accelerates the speed and sophistication of cyberattacks, protecting high-value data, such as financial records, legal files, patient data, intellectual property, and compliance records, has never been more urgent.

Read more...
Integrated security key to protecting cloud applications
Infrastructure Information Security
Cloud-native applications have transformed the way businesses operate, enabling faster innovation, greater agility, and enhanced scalability. Yet this evolution brings an equally complex security landscape.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.