Mitigating the risk of zero-day attacks against Microsoft 365

Issue 6 2022 Information Security

Microsoft 365 servers contain extremely sensitive information and most organisations simply cannot do without it for an extended period of time. Zero-day attacks – those attacks that take advantage of a vulnerability in software or firmware, and found by cybercriminals before a vendor can issue a fix – are one of the cybercriminal’s greatest advantages.


John Mc Loughlin.

Often providing privileged access, zero-day attacks become the means for a single cybercriminal group to potentially gain access to literally tens or hundreds of thousands of organisations in every geography, industry vertical, size and country. There are even posts on the dark web by cybercriminal gangs offering as much as $3 million for a zero-day remote code execution exploit.

According to a recent analysis, there were 80 zero-day vulnerabilities exploited in 2021, a 166% increase from 2020, with Microsoft, Apple and Google products most frequently targeted.

There was a zero-day attack on Microsoft Exchange in early 2021 that originated from a Chinese cyber espionage group dubbed Hafnium and, in total, exploited four vulnerabilities to exfiltrate mailbox contents, gain admin control over compromised servers and install malicious software.

While Microsoft provides a layer of security around its services, as well as copious amounts of QA to ensure its products are secure from the start, the Hafnium attack is a reminder that no vendor is impervious to very intelligent hackers who spend all their time trying to find a proverbial Achilles’ heel in a vendor’s code.

And should a zero-day attack occur, initial mitigations and updates are generally not immediately available, leaving organisations that are attack targets largely helpless to defend themselves during the time between an attack’s discovery and mitigation.

But what happens if the target is Microsoft 365, specifically Exchange Online, as email continues to be the number one initial attack vector? What can you do both proactively and reactively to mitigate the risk of a zero-day attack against it?

According to Mimecast, there are five key risk mitigation steps organisations can take to protect their operational investment in Microsoft 365. Considering that more than 90% of all cyberattacks start with an email, it is crucial to look at this aspect in more detail.

Secure email services

While we’re talking about protecting against zero-day attacks, no rule says a threat actor can’t also attempt to take advantage of email to spread malware within an organisation. And since this is one of those steps you can more easily address, it makes sense that you need to have a layer of protection that resides logically where an email enters your organisation.

What’s needed is a defence-in-depth approach, using third-party solutions, that augments any built-in security on Microsoft’s part. Microsoft 365 E3 licences do include Microsoft Defender and Exchange Online Protection to protect against email-based attacks, with E5 licences including the addition of Microsoft Defender for Identity and Endpoint. E3 customers have only the essential levels of protection, while E5 customers have advanced levels of protection and detection of email-borne attacks.

But even so, there are additional layers of your defence-in-depth strategy to harden the email perimeter that can be taken to make it increasingly difficult for cyberattackers to navigate. The goal is to stop any zero-day attacks that first need to establish a foothold via phishing.

Domain protection

Several technologies exist today to ensure the validity and integrity of emails received. Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance (DMARC) defines a policy around what should be done with an email where the sending domain appears to be impersonated.

The Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is used within DNS to identify the host names and IP addresses of valid email senders for a given domain. Putting these in place helps eliminate the possibility of successful domain impersonation on the part of the cyberattacker.

Credential harvesting detection

Sending domains can be validated to ensure phishing emails aren’t impersonating a trusted brand, while links and redirects can be intelligently followed to see if they take potential victims to a spoofed login page for Office 365, Outlook and other Microsoft 365 cloud services. Phishing kits used to quickly prop up an entire fake website front-end for harvesting can also be detected.

Use of artificial intelligence

The use of AI focusing on the relationships and connections between senders and recipients, including the strength or proximity of the relationships, can help identify anomalous emails that may be malicious.

Shared threat intelligence

A strong defence rests in it being based on shared threat intelligence to ensure the most up-to-date data to increase detections and reduce risk. In addition, the intelligence gathered through protecting the email perimeter should be shared back to your SIEM (security information and event management) platform to aid in providing a comprehensive view of what’s happening on your network.

Virtual sandboxing

The opening of an email can be simulated within a virtual environment where attachments can be detonated to see whether they perform a malicious action.

URL protection

Links can be scanned in real time and blocked from being clicked on if deemed malicious.

Email security for Microsoft 365

Uninterrupted business continuity is critical in keeping email flowing during planned and unplanned outages with a mailbox continuity solution that provides guaranteed access to live and historic email and attachments from Outlook and Windows, the web and mobile applications – from anywhere, on any device.

Solutions like Mimecast offer comprehensive email security and resilience solutions. AI-powered detection blocks all email-based threats, while easy-to-deploy, easy-to-manage complementary solutions reduce risk, cost and complexity. As a certified Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), J2 Software also provides end-to-end support to improve its clients’ cyber resilience and provides a solid framework for beneficial cyber insurance policies.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

95% do not have full trust in cybersecurity vendors
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Trust in cybersecurity vendors is fragile, difficult to measure, and increasingly shaping risk posture at both operational and board levels. Lack of verifiable transparency undermines cybersecurity decision-making, according to Sophos-backed research.

Read more...
Africa’s largest Zero Trust platform
NEC XON Information Security Commercial (Industry)
Africa has reached a significant cybersecurity milestone with the successful deployment of the continent’s largest Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access and Prisma Access Browser Zero Trust environment, supporting secure remote access for more than 40 000 users for a large enterprise in Africa.

Read more...
Supply chain attacks top threat over 12 months
Information Security
Supply chain attacks have become the most prevalent cyberthreat confronting businesses over the past year, according to a new Kaspersky global study, with nearly one-third of companies worldwide experiencing a supply chain threat in the past year.

Read more...
From vibe hacking to flat-pack malware
Information Security AI & Data Analytics
HP issued its latest Threat Insights Report, with strong indications that attackers are using AI to scale and accelerate campaigns, and that many are prioritising cost, effort, and efficiency over quality.

Read more...
NEC XON secures mobile provider’s hybrid identities
NEC XON Access Control & Identity Management Information Security Commercial (Industry)
For a leading South African telecommunications operator, identity protection has become a strategic priority as identity-centric attacks proliferate across the industry. The company faced mounting pressure to secure both human and non-human identities across complex hybrid environments.

Read more...
Microsoft 365 security is a ticking time bomb
Information Security
Across boardrooms and IT departments, a dangerous assumption persists that because data is stored in Microsoft 365 and Azure, it is automatically secure. This belief is fundamentally flawed and fosters a false sense of protection.

Read more...
Rise in malicious insider threat reports
News & Events Information Security
Mimecast Study finds 46% of SA organisations report a rise in malicious insider threat reports over the past year: reveals disconnect between security awareness and technical controls as AI-powered attacks accelerate.

Read more...
New campaign exploiting Google Tasks notifications
News & Events Information Security
New phishing scheme abuses legitimate Google Tasks notifications to trick corporate users into revealing corporate login credentials, which can then be used to gain unauthorised access to company systems, steal data, or launch further attacks.

Read more...
Making a mesh for security
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Credential-based attacks have reached epidemic levels. For African CISOs in particular, the message is clear: identity is now the perimeter, and defences must reflect that reality with coherence and context.

Read more...
What’s in store for PAM and IAM?
Access Control & Identity Management Information Security
Leostream predicts changes in Identity and Access Management (IAM) and Privileged Access Management (PAM) in the coming year, driven by evolving cybersecurity realities, hybridisation, AI, and more.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.