Mitigating the risk of zero-day attacks against Microsoft 365

Issue 6 2022 Information Security

Microsoft 365 servers contain extremely sensitive information and most organisations simply cannot do without it for an extended period of time. Zero-day attacks – those attacks that take advantage of a vulnerability in software or firmware, and found by cybercriminals before a vendor can issue a fix – are one of the cybercriminal’s greatest advantages.


John Mc Loughlin.

Often providing privileged access, zero-day attacks become the means for a single cybercriminal group to potentially gain access to literally tens or hundreds of thousands of organisations in every geography, industry vertical, size and country. There are even posts on the dark web by cybercriminal gangs offering as much as $3 million for a zero-day remote code execution exploit.

According to a recent analysis, there were 80 zero-day vulnerabilities exploited in 2021, a 166% increase from 2020, with Microsoft, Apple and Google products most frequently targeted.

There was a zero-day attack on Microsoft Exchange in early 2021 that originated from a Chinese cyber espionage group dubbed Hafnium and, in total, exploited four vulnerabilities to exfiltrate mailbox contents, gain admin control over compromised servers and install malicious software.

While Microsoft provides a layer of security around its services, as well as copious amounts of QA to ensure its products are secure from the start, the Hafnium attack is a reminder that no vendor is impervious to very intelligent hackers who spend all their time trying to find a proverbial Achilles’ heel in a vendor’s code.

And should a zero-day attack occur, initial mitigations and updates are generally not immediately available, leaving organisations that are attack targets largely helpless to defend themselves during the time between an attack’s discovery and mitigation.

But what happens if the target is Microsoft 365, specifically Exchange Online, as email continues to be the number one initial attack vector? What can you do both proactively and reactively to mitigate the risk of a zero-day attack against it?

According to Mimecast, there are five key risk mitigation steps organisations can take to protect their operational investment in Microsoft 365. Considering that more than 90% of all cyberattacks start with an email, it is crucial to look at this aspect in more detail.

Secure email services

While we’re talking about protecting against zero-day attacks, no rule says a threat actor can’t also attempt to take advantage of email to spread malware within an organisation. And since this is one of those steps you can more easily address, it makes sense that you need to have a layer of protection that resides logically where an email enters your organisation.

What’s needed is a defence-in-depth approach, using third-party solutions, that augments any built-in security on Microsoft’s part. Microsoft 365 E3 licences do include Microsoft Defender and Exchange Online Protection to protect against email-based attacks, with E5 licences including the addition of Microsoft Defender for Identity and Endpoint. E3 customers have only the essential levels of protection, while E5 customers have advanced levels of protection and detection of email-borne attacks.

But even so, there are additional layers of your defence-in-depth strategy to harden the email perimeter that can be taken to make it increasingly difficult for cyberattackers to navigate. The goal is to stop any zero-day attacks that first need to establish a foothold via phishing.

Domain protection

Several technologies exist today to ensure the validity and integrity of emails received. Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance (DMARC) defines a policy around what should be done with an email where the sending domain appears to be impersonated.

The Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is used within DNS to identify the host names and IP addresses of valid email senders for a given domain. Putting these in place helps eliminate the possibility of successful domain impersonation on the part of the cyberattacker.

Credential harvesting detection

Sending domains can be validated to ensure phishing emails aren’t impersonating a trusted brand, while links and redirects can be intelligently followed to see if they take potential victims to a spoofed login page for Office 365, Outlook and other Microsoft 365 cloud services. Phishing kits used to quickly prop up an entire fake website front-end for harvesting can also be detected.

Use of artificial intelligence

The use of AI focusing on the relationships and connections between senders and recipients, including the strength or proximity of the relationships, can help identify anomalous emails that may be malicious.

Shared threat intelligence

A strong defence rests in it being based on shared threat intelligence to ensure the most up-to-date data to increase detections and reduce risk. In addition, the intelligence gathered through protecting the email perimeter should be shared back to your SIEM (security information and event management) platform to aid in providing a comprehensive view of what’s happening on your network.

Virtual sandboxing

The opening of an email can be simulated within a virtual environment where attachments can be detonated to see whether they perform a malicious action.

URL protection

Links can be scanned in real time and blocked from being clicked on if deemed malicious.

Email security for Microsoft 365

Uninterrupted business continuity is critical in keeping email flowing during planned and unplanned outages with a mailbox continuity solution that provides guaranteed access to live and historic email and attachments from Outlook and Windows, the web and mobile applications – from anywhere, on any device.

Solutions like Mimecast offer comprehensive email security and resilience solutions. AI-powered detection blocks all email-based threats, while easy-to-deploy, easy-to-manage complementary solutions reduce risk, cost and complexity. As a certified Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), J2 Software also provides end-to-end support to improve its clients’ cyber resilience and provides a solid framework for beneficial cyber insurance policies.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Highest increase in global cyberattacks in two years
Information Security News & Events
Check Point Global Research released new data on Q2 2024 cyber-attack trends, noting a 30% global increase in Q2 2024, with Africa experiencing the highest average weekly per organisation.

Read more...
What does Agentic AI mean for cybersecurity?
Information Security AI & Data Analytics
AI agents will change how we work by scheduling meetings on our behalf and even managing supply chain items. However, without adequate protection, they become soft targets for criminals.

Read more...
Phishing attacks through SVG image files
Kaspersky News & Events Information Security
Kaspersky has detected a new trend: attackers are distributing phishing emails to individual and corporate users with attachments in SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) files, a format commonly used for storing images.

Read more...
Crypto in SA: between progress and precaution
Information Security
“As cryptocurrency gains momentum and legitimacy, it’s becoming increasingly important for people to pay attention to financial security”, says Richard Frost, head of technology and innovation at Armata Cyber Security.

Read more...
Cyber recovery requires a different approach to disaster recovery
Information Security
Disaster recovery is about getting operations back on track after unexpected disruptions; cyber recovery, however, is about calculated actions by bad actors aiming to disrupt your business, steal sensitive data, or hold your system hostage.

Read more...
MDR users claim 97,5% less
Sophos Information Security
The average cyber insurance claim following a significant cyberattack is just $75 000 for MDR users, compared with $3 million for endpoint-only users, according to a new independent study.

Read more...
The impact of GenAI on cybersecurity
Sophos News & Events Information Security
Sophos survey finds that 89% of IT leaders worry GenAI flaws could negatively impact their organisation’s cybersecurity strategies, with 87% of respondents stating they were concerned about a resulting lack of cybersecurity accountability.

Read more...
Efficient, future-proof estate security and management
Technews Publishing ElementC Solutions Duxbury Networking Fang Fences & Guards Secutel Technologies OneSpace Technologies DeepAlert SMART Security Solutions Editor's Choice Information Security Security Services & Risk Management Residential Estate (Industry) AI & Data Analytics IoT & Automation
In February this year, SMART Security Solutions travelled to Cape Town to experience the unbelievable experience of a city where potholes are fixed, and traffic lights work; and to host the Cape Town SMART Estate Security Conference 2025.

Read more...
Kaspersky KATA 7.0 for targeted attack protection
Information Security Products & Solutions
] Kaspersky has announced a major update to its Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack (KATA) including enhanced network detection and response (NDR) capabilities with deeper network visibility, internal threats detection and other critical security features.

Read more...
The role of advanced technologies in ransomware recovery
Information Security
As businesses increasingly adopt cloud technologies, the complexities of maintaining resilience and ensuring rapid recovery from such incidents become even more pronounced. The integration of advanced technologies is essential to navigate these challenges effectively.

Read more...