The growing costs of cybercrime

Issue 5 2022 Information Security, Security Services & Risk Management


Simeon Tassev.

Modern enterprises face an onslaught of cyberattacks from many quarters and must not only be prepared to contend with the direct costs of potential breaches, but also with spiralling indirect costs, such as compliance fines and reputational damage. As the threat landscape continues to evolve, so do the frequency and sophistication of attacks, with companies facing anything from denial-of-service attacks and phishing attempts to payment card skimming, identity theft and account takeover threats.

At the same time, ransomware attacks have gained prominence over the last few years, forcing companies to continually test their data protection plans to understand the risks associated with having sensitive data released to the public.

In its State of Ransomware 2021 report, released earlier this year, Sophos revealed that 24% of South African companies had experienced a ransomware attack in the past 12 months. It also found that the average cost to recover data stolen in industrial ransomware attacks in South Africa was $447 097 (R6,8 million). Perhaps equally startling are the figures released by the South African Banking Risk Information Centre (SABRIC), which show that South Africa loses $157 million (R2,4 billion) a year to cyberattacks.

Cost of non-compliance

Aside from these costs, companies must also be cognisant of the costs associated with compliance fines, should they be found to not be compliant with legislation such as the Protection of Personal Information (PoPI) ACT when a cyber breach event occurs.

On a positive note, significant progress and investment have been made by government to secure the country’s growing digital economy and to fight the ever-evolving cyber threats that come with it.

As such, we have seen a fair amount of cyber legislation that has recently been put in place in South Africa. We now have our own cyber law, which is extremely important, as in the past we could not prosecute many of the cybercrimes that were committed against South African entities. This was because no physical crime was perpetrated, and our previous legislation was based on geographical borders – so crimes had to be carried out within the borders of the country. Now, the cyber world is global and reaches beyond borders.

In South Africa, data breaches are a daily occurrence and not something that happens once or twice a year. In past years, we have seen high-profile breaches as such at Experian, Postbank, TransUnion and Sixt Car Rental, to name but a few.

Not a once-off cost

Yet, not many companies understand that the cost of these breaches is not a once-off and some of these incidents, especially in the case of a listed company, can have an impact for many years to come. In addition to the direct costs, companies must consider the loss of customer trust and goodwill, which could lead to a loss of future sales and cost the company exponentially more than the breach itself in the years to come.

No company wants to find itself in this position, which is why there is a lot of technology available that can be harnessed to prevent cyber breaches. Typically, there are also various levels of governance and standards frameworks, as well as compliance and maturity models, that companies can adopt to protect themselves from cyber criminals.

However, the most important questions is: where should companies start? The first step is for companies to understand their own environment and what is relevant to them. Essentially, it is all about acceptable risks. From a pure risk methodology perspective, there are always three ways to deal with risk. One is to accept the risk; another is to mitigate it and the last is to transfer it.

These types of assessments can show companies what their levels of readiness are and provides a baseline that can be monitored and measured against. Not only will this give organisations a view of what policies and systems they have in place, it will also enable them to see what measures still need to be put in place.

What’s most important is to then find a way to prioritise all of this, in terms of what is relevant to the specific organisation and what is acceptable in terms of risk. Unfortunately, there is no one size fits all, but the right partner can guide them and provide the necessary skills and expertise to protect their business.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

The line between locking residents out and restricting their access
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Residential Estate (Industry)
A June 2026 High Court judgment has clarified one of the most contested issues in modern estate governance: when an HOA's digital access restrictions amount to unlawful self-help or spoliation, and when they do not.

Read more...
Compressing cyberattack timelines and targeting ungoverned AI identities
Information Security News & Events
Sophos AI Security 2026 report finds attackers are moving beyond experimentation and operationalising AI for attacks using identity as the primary initial access vector, rather than inventing new attack types.

Read more...
Modernise field communications with Push-to-Talk over Cellular
Products & Solutions Security Services & Risk Management
Sentiv is bringing Hytera’s Push-to-Talk over Cellular (PTToC) portfolio to organisations that need a more structured and controlled way to coordinate field teams, without extending a full private radio model to every team, site, or function.

Read more...
Zero-touch automation certificate life cycle management loop
Products & Solutions Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
ManageEngine completes the certificate life cycle management loop with CA-agnostic, zero-touch automation. New post-deployment automation in Key Manager Plus removes the last manual step in certificate renewal as lifespans gradually shrink to 47 days

Read more...
Fire safety in South Africa
Technoswitch Fire Detection & Suppression Technews Publishing SMART Security Solutions Fire & Safety Security Services & Risk Management Editor's Choice
Fire safety is sometimes ignored, sometimes relegated to whatever is cheapest, and sometimes treated with the seriousness it deserves, given that it focuses on protecting life and assets. SMART Security Solutions asked Brett Birch, MD of Technoswitch, for some insights into the realities of fire safety in South Africa.

Read more...
Sophos launches AI-native cybersecurity defence system
News & Events Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Built for a threat landscape reshaped by AI, Sophos Fusion unites security operations, endpoint, network security, identity, email, and cloud into one defence system that prevents, detects, investigates, and responds at AI speed.

Read more...
Stop supplier fraud at the moment of payment
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Cape Town-built platform bridges the gap between onboarding and transaction by securing identity inside the live channels where companies exchange invoices and banking details.

Read more...
Ungoverned AI agents and deepfakes pose critical threats
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Global study reveals 64% of South African organisations already deploy autonomous AI agents with little to no governance, while 63% of employees admit they are unlikely to be able to spot attacks such as deepfakes

Read more...
A risk-based approach to fire safety
Fire & Safety Security Services & Risk Management Industrial (Industry) Agriculture (Industry)
A report by fire engineering consultancy ASP Fire is challenging blanket assumptions around combustible-core sandwich panels, arguing instead for a rational, risk-based approach that balances fire safety requirements with commercial realities in sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing and industrial processing.

Read more...
Preventing and suppressing lithium fires
SMART Security Solutions Technews Publishing Editor's Choice Fire & Safety Security Services & Risk Management Smart Home Automation
SMART Security Solutions asked Clyde Becker, director of Pyro Brand, for some insight into the mechanics of lithium-ion battery fire risks, especially thermal runaway, and to define a comprehensive, layered approach to fire detection and suppression.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.