The crucial double check

Issue 8 2021 Security Services & Risk Management

Cybersecurity has quickly become the world’s fastest growing form of criminal activity and is showing no sign of slowing down with the number of attacks on businesses continuing to increase. Covid-19 has acted as a catalyst for this, with hackers taking advantage of remote workers during challenging times.

Despite innovations and sophistication in hacking methods, one of the main means of data loss is insiders, including employees making mistakes. Humans make errors – stressed, distracted employees will make even more mistakes. And with sensitive information on the line, such as regulatory compliance to safeguarding intellectual property (IP), companies are increasingly concerned about the risk of inadvertent data loss. But how can this threat be mitigated?

Andrea Babbs, UK general manager, VIPRE SafeSend, emphasises the importance of implementing a crucial double check to improve email security culture.

Human error

Business reliance on email is creating a very significant cybersecurity risk and not simply due to the increasing volume and sophistication of phishing and ransomware attacks. Given the sheer volume of emails sent and received a day (over 300 billion every day in 2020), mistakes are inevitable. Employees are trusted with company-sensitive information and assets and many are permitted to make financial transactions – often without requiring additional approval. Furthermore, with strict data protection requirements in place, not only GDPR, but also industry specific regulations, organisations clearly require robust processes to mitigate the risk of inadvertent data loss.

According to reports, 34% of all breaches are caused by insider fault, yet many employees are unaware of their responsibility when it comes to data protection. Should confidential corporate information fall into the wrong hands, the consequences could be devastating, including financial penalties, loss of trust and competitors gaining an advantage. BitMEX, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency trading platforms accidentally leaked thousands of private customer email addresses when they sent out a mass mailshot without using the BCC function.

But how could this mistake be stopped? What employees need is a way to better manage their email functions, with an opportunity for potential mistakes to be flagged before an individual hits send, for example showing who is in the to, cc and bcc fields.

Additional layers

Few organisations have a clear strategy for helping their employees understand how a simple error can put the company at significant risk; even fewer have a strategy for mitigating that risk and protecting their staff from becoming an insider threat. But more importantly, what they may not be aware of is that there is a solution available that can add a layer of employee security awareness.

Businesses can help employees avoid simple mistakes, such as misaddressed emails, by providing a simple safety check, which alerts users to confirm both the identity of the addressee(s) and if relevant, any attachments. The solution can be configured to work on a department or user basis, for example, a business may not want HR to be able to mistakenly send sensitive personal information to anyone internally and therefore require a confirmation for all emails.

In addition to confirming email addresses and attachment(s), the technology can also check for keywords within the email content using data loss prevention (DLP) rules and each business can set its own requirements and parameters determined by corporate security protocols. Any emails, including attachments containing these keywords, will be flagged, requiring an extra process of validity before they are sent without impeding working practices and providing users with a chance to double check whether the data should be shared with the recipient(s).

The essential ‘pause’ moment

Deploying an essential tool that prompts for a second check and warns when a mistake is about to be made helps organisations mitigate the risk of accidental error and the potentially devastating consequences that might have on the business. Accidentally cc-ing a customer, rather than the similarly named colleague, will be avoided because the customer’s domain will not be on the allow list and therefore automatically highlighted. This is more crucial than ever before with employees dispersed across a range of locations as part of hybrid working. Such tools can support mixed operating system environments and DLP add-ons can be given to certain departments and groups who handle very sensitive information such as employee or legal data.

This type of tool is key for companies and reinforces a security culture, building on education and training, with a valuable solution that helps users avoid the common email mistakes that are inevitable when people are distracted, tired or stressed. It provides an essential ‘pause’ moment, enabling individuals to feel confident that emails have been sent to the right people and with the right attachments.

In addition to checking the validity of outbound and inbound email addresses and attachments, it can also support in minimising the risk of staff falling foul of a phishing attack. For example, an email that purports to come from inside the company, but actually has a cleverly disguised similar domain name, such as receiving an email from V1PRE, as opposed to VIPRE. The technology will automatically flag that email when the user replies showing that it is not from an allowed domain, enabling the user to cancel send and avoid falling for the phishing attack.

Conclusion

Email is arguably the key productivity tool in most working environments today, placing much of the responsibility for secure use of that tool on employees. But supporting staff with an extra prompt for them to double check they aren’t mistakenly sharing confidential data helps to raise awareness, understanding and provides that essential security lock-step – before it’s too late. The premise is not to add time or delay in the day-to-day management of email; it is about fostering an attitude of awareness and care in an area where a mistake is easily made 

No organisation is immune to human error, but by having a clear strategy in place to address the issue of misaddressed emails and data loss through emails, as well as mitigating the associated risks helps businesses to remain compliant and secure. It’s all about increasing awareness and improving email culture where mistakes can so easily be made, while reinforcing compliance credentials.

Find out more at https://global.vipre.com




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

957 women killed in three months
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Despite years of summits, task teams and public commitments, South Africa’s femicide rate remains around five times higher than the global average, and too few are using the legal lifelines available.

Read more...
The security debt hidden in residential estates
Security Services & Risk Management Integrated Solutions Residential Estate (Industry)
Many residential estates undermine their own security not through a lack of technology, but through hidden weaknesses in gate design, fragmented systems, recurring software dependence, weak operational ownership, and insufficient estate management input.

Read more...
Verification is reshaping South Africa’s labour market
Security Services & Risk Management Asset Management Commercial (Industry)
Hiring faster, trusting less: in a labour market defined by both constraint and potential, the ability to hire with confidence may well become one of the most important competitive advantages.

Read more...
Africa’s opportunity to shape the future of human-centred AI
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
Across the Global South, countries are not yet locked into decades of legacy AI systems, energy-intensive infrastructure, or governance frameworks designed for a different technological era. That creates something rare in technology development: a cleaner slate.

Read more...
AURA appoints Taryn Winer as global head of people
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Following its €13,5 million Series B funding round last year and accelerating international expansion, particularly across the United States, AURA has appointed Taryn Winer as global head of people.

Read more...
95% do not have full trust in cybersecurity vendors
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Trust in cybersecurity vendors is fragile, difficult to measure, and increasingly shaping risk posture at both operational and board levels. Lack of verifiable transparency undermines cybersecurity decision-making, according to Sophos-backed research.

Read more...
Enhancing control room operations
iFacts Security Services & Risk Management Surveillance
As South Africa faces complex and more advanced security challenges, the demand for advanced surveillance solutions, including CCTV and security control rooms, continues to surge, but what about the people in front of the screens?

Read more...
Understanding the Shared Responsibility Model
Infrastructure Security Services & Risk Management
While the cloud can certainly be a growth enabler in many ways, it can also introduce new security risks. Companies want to have a clear understanding of where their security duties end and where their cloud service provider’s begin.

Read more...
“This Is Theft!” SASA slams Mafoko Security
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Associations
The Security Association of South Africa (SASA) has issued a stark warning that the long-running Mafoko Security Patrols scandal is no longer an isolated case of employer misconduct, but evidence of a systemic failure in South Africa’s regulatory and governance structures.

Read more...
Making a mesh for security
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Credential-based attacks have reached epidemic levels. For African CISOs in particular, the message is clear: identity is now the perimeter, and defences must reflect that reality with coherence and context.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.