PoPIA: How the ‘Operator’ must use personal information

Issue 2 2021 Security Services & Risk Management

As the Protection of Personal Information Act (PoPIA) is only three months away from being enforced, organisations and responsible parties have had to gain an in-depth understanding of the rules and regulations that must be adhered to. While much focus has been placed on the roles and responsibilities that must be fulfilled to meet the standards of PoPIA, the role of the Operator must also be highlighted.

“The Operator plays a vital function and as such it is crucial that his/her duties and responsibilities are adequately understood. The Responsible Party is charged with ensuring that the personal information obtained is protected, but it is the Operator who actually uses the data provided,” explains Carrie Peter, solution owner at Impression Signatures.


Carrie Peter.

The Operator can be a person, a system, or a third-party service provider that works in conjunction with the Responsible Party but is not necessarily under the authority of the Responsible Party. The Operator’s primary responsibility is to process the information obtained from the data subject for its intended purpose, i.e., making sure that the information is being utilised for the purpose for which consent was given. If the Operator is a third-party provider and not causally linked to the organisation, consent will need to be obtained from the data subject for the Operator to process the personal information.

“Consent is of the highest importance within PoPIA. The data subject must be informed and give consent for the purpose and use of the personal information, as well as each individual organisation or entity that will have access to this information to fulfil the required purpose,” continues Peter.

Due to the Operator not being under the direct authority of the Responsible Party, the Responsible Party will require evidence and assurance from the Operator that all necessary standards and regulations are being adhered to. This is because, although the Operator is not under the Responsible Party’s authority, the Responsible Party is still accountable for what the Operator does with the personal information at hand.

This is an important point to highlight because it means that responsible parties must be sure of the Operators with which they work. It is imperative that the Operators are vetted and can prove their compliance to the required standards as outlined by PoPIA and included in a contract that will be signed between the Operator and the Responsible Party.

“The Operator may not utilise the data for any purpose other than the original and explicitly stated purpose under which it was obtained. The Operator may also not utilise any information without the permission and knowledge of the Responsible Party. The Operator is responsible for immediate notification to the Responsible Party if it is believed that the data was accessed by an unauthorised individual and/or entity,” she adds.

The Operator will have to ensure, and be able to prove, that the data obtained was utilised for its intended purpose; that the processing of the information was done under the instruction and authorisation of the Responsible Party; that safeguards were put into place to ensure that the data is protected while being processed; that the highest level of ethical and confidential rules and regulations were adhered to in the processing of the information; and that corrective measures were implemented in instances where a breach of data has occurred.

“The Operator has a very delicate job. If you think of the Responsible Party as a hospital theatre, the Operator is the surgeon. The Operator is not only responsible for processing the information for its intended purpose (although this is the primary function), but the Operator must also ensure that this processing is done with the highest level of confidentiality,” concludes Peter.

While Responsible Parties are charged with the duty of ensuring that the data is protected, Operators carry a similar responsibility within their processing procedures. These two roles, although often performed by separate entities, are part of the same whole. It is a partnership through which all rules and regulations as outlined by PoPIA must be complied with.

As part of Impression Signature’s PoPIA Campaign, smaller businesses shouldn’t be precluded from being able to comply with the Act simply because they don’t have large budgets. To this end, the Impression Campaign offers free guidance, simplifying the roles and responsibilities to empower all companies to comply.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

“This Is Theft!” SASA slams Mafoko Security
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Associations
The Security Association of South Africa (SASA) has issued a stark warning that the long-running Mafoko Security Patrols scandal is no longer an isolated case of employer misconduct, but evidence of a systemic failure in South Africa’s regulatory and governance structures.

Read more...
Making a mesh for security
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Credential-based attacks have reached epidemic levels. For African CISOs in particular, the message is clear: identity is now the perimeter, and defences must reflect that reality with coherence and context.

Read more...
Privacy by design or by accident
Security Services & Risk Management Infrastructure
Africa’s data future depends on getting it right at the start. If privacy controls do not withstand real-world conditions, such as unstable power, fragile last-mile connectivity, shared devices, and decentralised branch environments, then privacy exists only on paper.

Read more...
From friction to trust
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management Financial (Industry)
Historically, fraud prevention has been viewed as a trade-off between robust security and a seamless customer journey, with security often prevailing. However, this can impair business functionality or complicate the customer journey with multiple logins and authentication steps.

Read more...
Security ready to move out of the basement
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
Panaseer believes that in 2026, a board member at a major corporation will lose their job amid rising breaches and legal scrutiny, as organisations recognise that cyber risk is a business risk that CISOs cannot shoulder alone.

Read more...
Cyber remains top business risk, but AI fastest riser at #2
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
The Allianz Risk Barometer 2026 ranks cybersecurity, especially ransomware attacks, as the #1 risk, while AI is the biggest riser and jumps from #10 to #2, highlighting the emerging risks for companies in almost all industry sectors.

Read more...
OT calculator to align cyber investments with business goals
Industrial (Industry) Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
The OT Calculator has been developed specifically for industrial organisations to assess the potential costs of insufficient operational technology (OT) security. By offering detailed financial forecasts, the calculator empowers senior management to make well-informed decisions.

Read more...
From digital transformation to digital sovereignty
Security Services & Risk Management IoT & Automation
As cyberthreats grow, data regulations tighten, and AI becomes central to economic competitiveness, countries are recognising the need to control and protect their own digital assets.

Read more...
The age of Lean 4.0: Orchestrating intelligence and efficiency
Security Services & Risk Management
The convergence of Lean principles and AI (what we now call Lean 4.0) is no longer a theoretical exercise; it is the defining operational paradigm for survival and growth in a complex, data-intensive economy.

Read more...
Risks of open-source intelligence escalating in crime
Security Services & Risk Management Residential Estate (Industry) Smart Home Automation
CMS estimates that open-source intelligence has played a role in 20 - 30% of robberies over the past 12 months. In cybercrime, global research consistently shows that many offences rely on some form of open-source data exploitation.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.