PoPIA: How the ‘Operator’ must use personal information

Issue 2 2021 Security Services & Risk Management

As the Protection of Personal Information Act (PoPIA) is only three months away from being enforced, organisations and responsible parties have had to gain an in-depth understanding of the rules and regulations that must be adhered to. While much focus has been placed on the roles and responsibilities that must be fulfilled to meet the standards of PoPIA, the role of the Operator must also be highlighted.

“The Operator plays a vital function and as such it is crucial that his/her duties and responsibilities are adequately understood. The Responsible Party is charged with ensuring that the personal information obtained is protected, but it is the Operator who actually uses the data provided,” explains Carrie Peter, solution owner at Impression Signatures.


Carrie Peter.

The Operator can be a person, a system, or a third-party service provider that works in conjunction with the Responsible Party but is not necessarily under the authority of the Responsible Party. The Operator’s primary responsibility is to process the information obtained from the data subject for its intended purpose, i.e., making sure that the information is being utilised for the purpose for which consent was given. If the Operator is a third-party provider and not causally linked to the organisation, consent will need to be obtained from the data subject for the Operator to process the personal information.

“Consent is of the highest importance within PoPIA. The data subject must be informed and give consent for the purpose and use of the personal information, as well as each individual organisation or entity that will have access to this information to fulfil the required purpose,” continues Peter.

Due to the Operator not being under the direct authority of the Responsible Party, the Responsible Party will require evidence and assurance from the Operator that all necessary standards and regulations are being adhered to. This is because, although the Operator is not under the Responsible Party’s authority, the Responsible Party is still accountable for what the Operator does with the personal information at hand.

This is an important point to highlight because it means that responsible parties must be sure of the Operators with which they work. It is imperative that the Operators are vetted and can prove their compliance to the required standards as outlined by PoPIA and included in a contract that will be signed between the Operator and the Responsible Party.

“The Operator may not utilise the data for any purpose other than the original and explicitly stated purpose under which it was obtained. The Operator may also not utilise any information without the permission and knowledge of the Responsible Party. The Operator is responsible for immediate notification to the Responsible Party if it is believed that the data was accessed by an unauthorised individual and/or entity,” she adds.

The Operator will have to ensure, and be able to prove, that the data obtained was utilised for its intended purpose; that the processing of the information was done under the instruction and authorisation of the Responsible Party; that safeguards were put into place to ensure that the data is protected while being processed; that the highest level of ethical and confidential rules and regulations were adhered to in the processing of the information; and that corrective measures were implemented in instances where a breach of data has occurred.

“The Operator has a very delicate job. If you think of the Responsible Party as a hospital theatre, the Operator is the surgeon. The Operator is not only responsible for processing the information for its intended purpose (although this is the primary function), but the Operator must also ensure that this processing is done with the highest level of confidentiality,” concludes Peter.

While Responsible Parties are charged with the duty of ensuring that the data is protected, Operators carry a similar responsibility within their processing procedures. These two roles, although often performed by separate entities, are part of the same whole. It is a partnership through which all rules and regulations as outlined by PoPIA must be complied with.

As part of Impression Signature’s PoPIA Campaign, smaller businesses shouldn’t be precluded from being able to comply with the Act simply because they don’t have large budgets. To this end, the Impression Campaign offers free guidance, simplifying the roles and responsibilities to empower all companies to comply.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

Detect procurement fraud before losses escalate
Security Services & Risk Management News & Events Financial (Industry) Editor's Choice
Organisations need to move procurement fraud prevention closer to the point where suspicious activity occurs, rather than relying primarily on investigations after money has already been lost, according to SAS and FACTS Consulting.

Read more...
R45 billion private security sector’s growing liability gap
Security Services & Risk Management
Constitutional Court and appellate decisions shine a spotlight on the potentially massive civil liability that security companies could face for operational failures and, in certain circumstances, the conduct of employees – exposure often not covered by public liability insurance.

Read more...
AI fraud is outrunning banking defences
Security Services & Risk Management Financial (Industry)
South Africans are increasingly being targeted by AI-generated fraudsters who sound just like bank employees. However, many local banks are still struggling with legacy tech, slow change processes, and limited data visibility.

Read more...
AI assistants learn bad workplace habits
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
An employee under pressure at a logistics firm finds a productivity-boosting shortcut. Instead of manually parsing a 40-page supplier contract, they paste the confidential PDF into a public generative AI tool for a quick summary.

Read more...
Mining's critical controls are not the problem; execution is
Security Services & Risk Management Mining (Industry)
As Parliament considers amendments intended to strengthen managerial responsibility, employer accountability, enforcement and penalties under the Mine Health and Safety Act, Alvarez & Marsal warns that tougher rules must be matched by stronger execution at the rockface.

Read more...
Shadow AI: The next evolution of Shadow IT
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
Today, as AI gains traction in all aspects of life and business, African organisations face a new challenge, known as ‘Shadow AI’, where employees at all levels make use of AI without considering the potential impact.

Read more...
Free live travel risk map covering multiple countries
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Most widely cited travel risk maps are published once a year as static documents, but risk conditions do not follow a publishing calendar. The Sicuro map draws on official travel advisories from the ...

Read more...
Unrest readiness is built between crises, not during them
Technews Publishing Security Services & Risk Management
The 30 June marches passed largely peacefully, and that outcome was no accident. It was the result of preparation, and a level of cooperation between police, private security, communities and business that this country has not always managed.

Read more...
The line between locking residents out and restricting their access
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Residential Estate (Industry)
A June 2026 High Court judgment has clarified one of the most contested issues in modern estate governance: when an HOA's digital access restrictions amount to unlawful self-help or spoliation, and when they do not.

Read more...
Modernise field communications with Push-to-Talk over Cellular
Products & Solutions Security Services & Risk Management
Sentiv is bringing Hytera’s Push-to-Talk over Cellular (PTToC) portfolio to organisations that need a more structured and controlled way to coordinate field teams, without extending a full private radio model to every team, site, or function.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.