Monopoly: AI edition

1 August 2020 Security Services & Risk Management

Due to the inherent nature of artificial intelligence (AI), AI-powered industries naturally tend towards monopolisation. This is because once the software and algorithms have been developed, AI uses data to continue to learn and find solutions to problems without (or with minimal) human intervention, and it does so with increased accuracy and efficacy compared to humans. This makes it more difficult for competitors to catch up.

When the first company completes the development of its AI and starts to sell it worldwide before its competitors do, the clock starts ticking and the lapse of time before the next AI emerges on the market determines the competitive scene.

While major technology companies are already using AI technology, its application in traditional industries, such as the healthcare and automotive sectors, is just beginning. For example, in the healthcare industry, AI can already be used to diagnose patients via photographs and can predict whether a patient is at an increased risk for suicide purely from the application of standardised tests. However, more research and development is needed before hospitals and clinics begin using this technology on their patients en masse.

The application of AI in traditional industries such as the healthcare and automotive sectors requires regulation in terms of competition and antitrust law. There is scope for antitrust regulators to step in and regulate economies that contribute to global competition, without stifling innovation and wealth creation. How they will effectively achieve this, however, is still unclear.

Abuse of dominance laws

Abuse of dominance laws could potentially protect consumers from harmful monopolies. In South Africa. Such laws prevent companies that have market power of 35% or more from charging excessive prices, refusing access to competitors and customers to essential facilities or scarce products and generally engaging in ‘exclusionary’ acts. The South African Competition Commission has already spent time and resources in understanding digital markets in this respect.

Abuse of dominance laws may also help in closing the data gap in the development of AI. By making the data used by the first AI in a particular market available to subsequent AIs in that same market, when new AIs enter a market, they would theoretically already be on the same level as the original AI. In other words, all AI services in the same industry will enter the market, already having the same knowledge as the other AIs available for sale. In the context of the healthcare industry, allowing access to the data analysed from the patients that the first AI has diagnosed would place subsequent similar AIs on the same level playing field.

However, the option of data sharing does come with its own problems, as the privacy of consumers must also be considered when allowing competitors to access consumer data. For AI to succeed, consumers would need to trust that the data collected via the use of a particular service will not be shared or traced back to them.

Ensuring competition

Recent amendments to the Competition Act 89 of 1998 in South Africa could signal a further starting point in regulating AI. Since the amendments, companies accused of charging excessive prices bear the burden of proving that the prices charged for goods or services are reasonable. Consumers who make use of AI services will thus be protected, as the price charged for services using AI will need to be reasonable, as with every other service. However, this could have the unintended consequence of making it difficult for competitors to enter the market as, if the best (or only) AI in a specific industry is priced reasonably, this is most likely the AI that consumers will use, and there may not be a reason or need for any other AI services in that market.

The list of problems and potential solutions are clearly numerous and varied, however, we will not have all the answers until AI is well established in everyday life and becomes increasingly regulated as a result. Even then, amendments to existing antitrust legislation will need to be made quickly and carefully to ensure that AI services can succeed in a competitive economy, without destroying competitive dynamics.




Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page



Further reading:

The security debt hidden in residential estates
Security Services & Risk Management Integrated Solutions Residential Estate (Industry)
Many residential estates undermine their own security not through a lack of technology, but through hidden weaknesses in gate design, fragmented systems, recurring software dependence, weak operational ownership, and insufficient estate management input.

Read more...
Verification is reshaping South Africa’s labour market
Security Services & Risk Management Asset Management Commercial (Industry)
Hiring faster, trusting less: in a labour market defined by both constraint and potential, the ability to hire with confidence may well become one of the most important competitive advantages.

Read more...
Africa’s opportunity to shape the future of human-centred AI
AI & Data Analytics Security Services & Risk Management
Across the Global South, countries are not yet locked into decades of legacy AI systems, energy-intensive infrastructure, or governance frameworks designed for a different technological era. That creates something rare in technology development: a cleaner slate.

Read more...
AURA appoints Taryn Winer as global head of people
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management
Following its €13,5 million Series B funding round last year and accelerating international expansion, particularly across the United States, AURA has appointed Taryn Winer as global head of people.

Read more...
95% do not have full trust in cybersecurity vendors
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Trust in cybersecurity vendors is fragile, difficult to measure, and increasingly shaping risk posture at both operational and board levels. Lack of verifiable transparency undermines cybersecurity decision-making, according to Sophos-backed research.

Read more...
Enhancing control room operations
iFacts Security Services & Risk Management Surveillance
As South Africa faces complex and more advanced security challenges, the demand for advanced surveillance solutions, including CCTV and security control rooms, continues to surge, but what about the people in front of the screens?

Read more...
Understanding the Shared Responsibility Model
Infrastructure Security Services & Risk Management
While the cloud can certainly be a growth enabler in many ways, it can also introduce new security risks. Companies want to have a clear understanding of where their security duties end and where their cloud service provider’s begin.

Read more...
“This Is Theft!” SASA slams Mafoko Security
News & Events Security Services & Risk Management Associations
The Security Association of South Africa (SASA) has issued a stark warning that the long-running Mafoko Security Patrols scandal is no longer an isolated case of employer misconduct, but evidence of a systemic failure in South Africa’s regulatory and governance structures.

Read more...
Making a mesh for security
Information Security Security Services & Risk Management
Credential-based attacks have reached epidemic levels. For African CISOs in particular, the message is clear: identity is now the perimeter, and defences must reflect that reality with coherence and context.

Read more...
Privacy by design or by accident
Security Services & Risk Management Infrastructure
Africa’s data future depends on getting it right at the start. If privacy controls do not withstand real-world conditions, such as unstable power, fragile last-mile connectivity, shared devices, and decentralised branch environments, then privacy exists only on paper.

Read more...










While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. | All Rights Reserved.