Follow us on:
Follow us on Facebook  Share via Twitter  Share via LinkedIn
 

Search...
Hi-Tech Security Solutions Business Directory


What you need to know about the Duqu threat
November 2011, Security Services & Risk Management, Information Security

According to researchers at Symantec Security Response, this new malicious program has been developed to steal the kind of information needed to mount another Stuxnet-like attack. Here are the latest details.

On 19 October 19, Symantec released its analysis of a new threat, called Duqu, that appears to be the precursor to a future, Stuxnet-like attack. Parts of Duqu are nearly identical to the Stuxnet worm, but its sole purpose is to gather intelligence that could be used to give attackers the insight they need to mount future attacks. Duqu is not widespread, but it is highly targeted at suppliers to industrial facilities.

In at least one targeted organisation, Symantec has confirmed that the installer file was a Microsoft Word document, which exploited a previously unknown kernel vulnerability that allows code execution. When the document was opened, malicious code executed and installed the main Duqu binaries. Microsoft is aware of the vulnerability, and is working on issuing a patch and an advisory.

Duqu was recovered from a limited group of organisations based in Europe and first analysed by the Laboratory of Cryptography and System Security in Budapest.

How it works

Where Stuxnet was designed to reprogram industrial control systems (hardware used to manage industrial environments such as power plants and oil refineries), attackers have used Duqu to install keystroke loggers to gather information from the infected computers.

Although Duqu uses some of the same source code as Stuxnet, its payload is not destructive. It is primarily a remote access Trojan that does not self-replicate in order to spread itself, which means it is not a worm. Two variants of the threat were initially recovered, although Symantec has since discovered additional variants.

Duqu consists of an installer, a driver file, a main DLL, and a configuration file. Like Stuxnet, Duqu masks itself as legitimate code using a driver file signed with a valid digital certificate. The certificate, which belongs to a company headquartered in Taipei, was revoked on 14 October.

Attacks using Duqu and its variants may have been going on since last December based on a review of file-compilation times, according to Symantec.

Duqu uses HTTP and HTTPS to communicate with two known command-and-control (C&C) servers that are both now inactive. Attackers were able to download additional executables through the C&C servers, including an infostealer that can perform actions such as enumerating the network, recording keystrokes and gathering system information. The information is logged to a lightly encrypted and compressed local file, which is then exported.

The threat uses a custom C&C protocol, primarily downloading or uploading what appear to be JPG files. However, in addition to transferring JPG files, other data is encrypted and sent out. Duqu is configured to run for 30 or 36 days, at which point it will automatically remove itself from a system.

So far, Duqu infections have been confirmed in at least six organisations in eight countries (France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, the Ukraine, India, Iran, Sudan, and Vietnam).

Protect your private keys

The investigation by Symantec researchers concluded that some of the files associated with Duqu were signed with a private key stolen from an organisation, whose systems appear to have been compromised. The private key was associated with the code-signing certificate issued to that customer.

While it is not known how this particular key was compromised, Symantec offers the following recommendations to better protect private keys:

Separate test signing and release signing. It is a best practice to set up a parallel code-signing infrastructure using test certificates generated by an internal test root certificate authority. This ensures that business-critical private certificates used to sign officially released software are not stored on insecure build systems used for routine R&D software development tasks, reducing the likelihood that they will be compromised.

Cryptographic hardware modules. Keys stored in software on general-purpose computers are susceptible to compromise. It is more secure, and a best practice, to store keys in secure, tamper-proof, cryptographic hardware devices.

Physical security. There is no security without physical security. If it is possible for an outsider, or a malicious insider, to gain access to code-signing keys, then all cryptography measures are for naught. Cameras, guards, fingerprint scanners, and additional measures are all appropriate to protect critical assets and should be taken seriously.

Stuxnet opened the door to malware having profound political and social ramifications. While there is still much to be learned from the complexity of this threat, Stuxnet has already changed the way researchers approach malware and view the security threat landscape. The story continues now with Duqu, a new threat whose goal is to gather the intelligence that attackers need to mount a future, Stuxnet-like attack.

For a comprehensive technical analysis of this latest threat, download the Symantec Security Response White Paper: W32.Duqu: The precursor to the next Stuxnet


  Share via Twitter   Share via LinkedIn      

Further reading:

  • Innovative security solutions
    October 2014, G4S Cash Solutions SA, Security Services & Risk Management
    As a trusted partner with established networks and strong relationships with central banks, G4S brings expertise in cash management, logistics, intelligent systems and the latest technology to the banking sector and financial institutions.
  • Improve guard management with data
    October 2014, Betatrac Telematic Solutions, Security Services & Risk Management
    BetaTrac is about to change the face of guarding by assisting service providers and clients by providing accurate reporting and real-time tracking, as well as improved fleet management services through the intelligent use of technology and data.
  • New patrol management system
    October 2014, Security Services & Risk Management
    OnGuard releases third generation of its guard monitoring and management system that includes new features, some of which are unique to the OnGuard system.
  • Technology will not resolve POPI problems
    October 2014, Security Services & Risk Management
    The Protection of Personal Information Act (POPI) is often mistakenly compared to Acts such as Consumer Protection, and subsequently not taken very seriously.
  • New vehicle recognition solution
    October 2014, Security Services & Risk Management
    Vehicles have many parameters which can identify them and enforcement agencies need to build a full and complete picture, with licence plates being one of the major parameters.
  • Turning big data into actionable intelligence
    October 2014, Security Services & Risk Management
    Crest Advisory, launched in 2011 in the UK, delivers intelligence that allows its customers to deliver better services with measurable results.
  • Checking your FM provider
    October 2014, Johnson Controls, Security Services & Risk Management
    Facilities Management (FM) outsource service providers work on the premises of their clients. If they do not adhere to health and safety legislation and the requirements specific to their client’s operations, ...
  • Renting for excellent service
    October 2014, Security Services & Risk Management
    Cut out the massive capital required for a new perimeter security project by ­renting the entire solution for a monthly fee, which includes maintenance for the duration of the contract.
  • Local profile: Zonke Monitoring Systems
    September 2014, Security Services & Risk Management
    Hi-Tech Security Solutions finds out more about Zonke Monitoring Systems (ZMS), its line of business and impact in the gambling industry in South Africa and the African continent.
  • New patrol management system
    September 2014, Security Services & Risk Management
    OnGuard releases the third generation of its guard monitoring and management system that includes new features, some of which are unique to the OnGuard system.
  • HVAC performance degrading?
    September 2014, Johnson Controls, Security Services & Risk Management
    Regular maintenance can ensure that HVAC equipment remains efficient, but it could also cut energy costs. Part failure can seriously impact the performance of equipment, so it makes good sense to keep an eye on key components that have the greatest energy impacts.
  • Healthcare security without the complexity
    August 2014, HID Global, Healthcare (Industry), Security Services & Risk Management
    [Hospital and healthcare security is critical at the door, for protecting patient data, and in the cloud.

 
 
         
Contact:
Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd
1st Floor, Stabilitas House
265 Kent Ave, Randburg, 2194
South Africa
Publications by Technews
Dataweek Electronics & Communications Technology
Electronic Buyers Guide (EBG)

Hi-Tech Security Solutions
Hi-Tech Security Business Directory (HSBD)

Motion Control in Southern Africa
Motion Control Buyers’ Guide (MCBG)

South African Instrumentation & Control
South African Instrumentation & Control Buyers’ Guide (IBG)
Other
Terms & conditions of use, including privacy policy
PAIA Manual
         
    Mobile | Classic

Copyright © Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved.